10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A comparison of genetic variants between proficient low- and high-risk sport participants.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Athletes participating in high-risk sports consistently report higher scores on sensation-seeking measures than do low-risk athletes or non-athletic controls. To determine whether genetic variants commonly associated with sensation seeking were over-represented in such athletes, proficient practitioners of high-risk (n = 141) and low-risk sports (n = 132) were compared for scores on sensation seeking and then genotyped at 33 polymorphic loci in 14 candidate genes. As expected, athletes participating in high-risk sports score higher on sensation seeking than did low-risk sport athletes (P < .01). Genotypes were associated with high-risk sport participation for two genes (stathmin, (P = .004) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (P = .03)) as well as when demographically matched subsets of the sport cohorts were compared (P < .05); however, in all cases, associations did not survive correction for multiple testing.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Sports Sci
          Journal of sports sciences
          Informa UK Limited
          1466-447X
          0264-0414
          2015
          : 33
          : 18
          Affiliations
          [1 ] a School of Kinesiology , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada.
          Article
          10.1080/02640414.2015.1020841
          25751253
          17e828d8-0848-484b-b5bb-06d811532411
          History

          BDNF,genetics,reward,risk-taking sport,sensation seeking,stathmin

          Comments

          Comment on this article