46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Toxicity Data Landscape for Environmental Chemicals

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Thousands of chemicals are in common use, but only a portion of them have undergone significant toxicologic evaluation, leading to the need to prioritize the remainder for targeted testing. To address this issue, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other organizations are developing chemical screening and prioritization programs. As part of these efforts, it is important to catalog, from widely dispersed sources, the toxicology information that is available. The main objective of this analysis is to define a list of environmental chemicals that are candidates for the U.S. EPA screening and prioritization process, and to catalog the available toxicology information.

          Data sources

          We are developing ACToR (Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource), which combines information for hundreds of thousands of chemicals from > 200 public sources, including the U.S. EPA, National Institutes of Health, Food and Drug Administration, corresponding agencies in Canada, Europe, and Japan, and academic sources.

          Data extraction

          ACToR contains chemical structure information; physical–chemical properties; in vitro assay data; tabular in vivo data; summary toxicology calls (e.g., a statement that a chemical is considered to be a human carcinogen); and links to online toxicology summaries. Here, we use data from ACToR to assess the toxicity data landscape for environmental chemicals.

          Data synthesis

          We show results for a set of 9,912 environmental chemicals being considered for analysis as part of the U.S. EPA ToxCast screening and prioritization program. These include high-and medium-production-volume chemicals, pesticide active and inert ingredients, and drinking water contaminants.

          Conclusions

          Approximately two-thirds of these chemicals have at least limited toxicity summaries available. About one-quarter have been assessed in at least one highly curated toxicology evaluation database such as the U.S. EPA Toxicology Reference Database, U.S. EPA Integrated Risk Information System, and the National Toxicology Program.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Safe handling of nanotechnology.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Caco-2 cell monolayer: usefulness and limitations.

            The Caco-2 monolayer has been used extensively for the high-throughput screening of drug permeability and identification of substrates, inhibitors, and inducers of intestinal transporters, especially P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Traditionally, the Caco-2 monolayer is viewed as a single barrier rather than a polarized cell monolayer consisting of metabolic enzymes that are sandwiched between two membrane barriers with distinctly different transporters. This review addressed the usefulness and limitations of the Caco-2 cell monolayer in drug discovery and mechanistic studies. This mini-review covered applications of the Caco-2 monolayer, clarified misconceptions, and critically addressed issues on data interpretation. The catenary model extends the usefulness of Caco-2 monolayer and provides proper mechanistic insight and data interpretation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Are there other persistent organic pollutants? A challenge for environmental chemists.

              The past 5 years have seen some major successes in terms of global measurement and regulation of persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PB&T) chemicals and persistent organic pollutants (POPs). The Stockholm Convention, a global agreement on POPs, came into force in 2004. There has been a major expansion of measurements and risk assessments of new chemical contaminants in the global environment, particularly brominated diphenyl ethers and perfluorinated alkyl acids. However, the list of chemicals measured represents only a small fraction of the approximately 30,000 chemicals widely used in commerce (>1 t/y). The vast majority of existing and new chemical substances in commerce are not monitored in environmental media. Assessment and screening of thousands of existing chemicals in commerce in the United States, Europe, and Canada have yielded lists of potentially persistent and bioaccumulative chemicals. Here we review recent screening and categorization studies of chemicals in commerce and address the question of whether there is now sufficient information to permit a broader array of chemicals to be determined in environmental matrices. For example, Environment Canada's recent categorization of the Domestic (existing) Substances list, using a wide array of quantitative structure activity relationships for PB&T characteristics, has identified about 5.5% of 11,317 substances as meeting P & B criteria. Using data from the Environment Canada categorization, we have listed, for discussion purposes, 30 chemicals with high predicted bioconcentration and low rate of biodegradation and 28 with long range atmospheric transport potential based on predicted atmospheric oxidation half-lives >2 days and log air-water partition coefficients > or =5 and < or =1. These chemicals are a diverse group including halogenated organics, cyclic siloxanes, and substituted aromatics. Some of these chemicals and their transformation products may be candidates for future environmental monitoring. However, to improve these predictions data on emissions from end use are needed to refine environmental fate predictions, and analytical methods may need to be developed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Health Perspect
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
                0091-6765
                1552-9924
                May 2009
                22 December 2008
                : 117
                : 5
                : 685-695
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA;
                [2 ]Office of Pesticide Programs, Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Arlington, Virginia, USA;
                [3 ]Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics and
                [4 ]Office of Science Coordination and Policy, Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA;
                [5 ]Office of Water, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA;
                [6 ]Great Lakes National Program Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago, Illinois, USA
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to R. Judson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Dr. (B205-01), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 USA. Telephone: (919) 541-3085. Fax: (919) 541-1194. E-mail: judson.richard@ 123456epa.gov

                The authors declare they have no competing financial interests.

                Article
                ehp-117-685
                10.1289/ehp.0800168
                2685828
                19479008
                17ef825c-6366-4338-ba16-19f13a676891
                This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI.
                History
                : 8 September 2008
                : 22 December 2008
                Categories
                Review

                Public health
                database,developmental,reproductive,carcinogenicity,hpv,pesticide,hazard,mpv,toxicity,actor
                Public health
                database, developmental, reproductive, carcinogenicity, hpv, pesticide, hazard, mpv, toxicity, actor

                Comments

                Comment on this article