10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of reproductive factors on stage, grade and hormone receptor status in early-onset breast cancer

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 1
      Breast Cancer Research
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Women younger than 35 years who are diagnosed with breast cancer tend to have more advanced stage tumors and poorer prognoses than do older women. Pregnancy is associated with elevated exposure to estrogen, which may influence the progression of breast cancer in young women. The objective of the present study was to examine the relationship between reproductive events and tumor stage, grade, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status, and survival in women diagnosed with early-onset breast cancer.

          Methods

          In a population-based, case–case study of 254 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at age under 35 years, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression with tumor characteristics as dependent variables and adjusting for age and education. Survival analyses also examined the relationship between reproductive events and overall survival.

          Results

          Compared with nulliparous women, women with three or more childbirths were more likely to be diagnosed with nonlocalized tumors (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.3–7.7), and early age (<20 years) at first full-term pregnancy was also associated with a diagnosis of breast cancer that was nonlocalized (OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.2–7.4) and of higher grade (OR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.0–9.9). The hazard ratio for death among women with two or more full-term pregnancies, as compared with those with one full-term pregnancy or none, was 2.1 (95% CI = 1.0–4.5), adjusting for stage. Among parous women, those who lactated were at decreased risk for both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negative tumors (OR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.1–0.5, and OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2–0.8, respectively).

          Conclusion

          The results of the present study suggest that pregnancy and lactation may influence tumor presentation and survival in women with early-onset breast cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transient increase in the risk of breast cancer after giving birth.

          The effect of pregnancy on the risk of breast cancer is not clear. We tested the hypothesis that the risk of breast cancer increases transiently after pregnancy but then falls to a level below that of age-matched nulliparous women. We conducted a case-control study of a nationwide cohort in Sweden, using a computerized record linkage between the Cancer Registry and the Fertility Registry. The study subjects were women born from 1925 through 1960 who were resident citizens of Sweden at the time of the 1960 census. A total of 12,666 patients with breast cancer were compared with 62,121 age-matched control subjects. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for the development of breast cancer at different ages, according to maternal age at first delivery (in uniparous as compared with nulliparous women) and age at second delivery (in biparous as compared with uniparous women). Uniparous women were at higher risk of breast cancer than nulliparous women for up to 15 years after childbirth and at lower risk thereafter. The excess risk was most pronounced among women who were older at the time of their first delivery (odds ratio 5 years after delivery among women 35 years old at first delivery, 1.26; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.44). Women who had two pregnancies had a less striking increase in risk. Pregnancy has a dual effect on the risk of breast cancer: it transiently increases the risk after childbirth but reduces the risk in later years. In women with two pregnancies, the short-term adverse effect is masked by the long-term protection imparted by the first pregnancy. A plausible biologic interpretation is that pregnancy increases the short-term risk of breast cancer by stimulating the growth of cells that have undergone the early stages of malignant transformation but that it confers long-term protection by inducing the differentiation of normal mammary stem cells that have the potential for neoplastic change.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Younger women with breast carcinoma have a poorer prognosis than older women.

            It is controversial whether breast cancer in young women is more aggressive than in older women. This study was initiated to determine age-associated outcome of women with breast carcinoma. Patients with breast carcinoma, who were identified in a statewide tumor registry, were divided into age groups based on 10-year intervals (ages 40 and younger, 41 to 50, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80, and older than 80 years). Age at diagnosis, American Joint Committee on Cancer classification, 5-year disease free (5DFS) and cancer specific (5CSS) survival estimates using Kaplan-Meier analysis were determined. Between 1985 and 1992, 3722 women were diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma. Approximately 5.6% (210) of the women were 40 years old or younger. The youngest age group had the worst 5CSS of 69.7%, followed by the oldest age group (> 80, 5CSS = 71.45%). The age groups 41 to 50, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and 71 to 80 years had 5CSS of 80.30%, 78.45%, 82.06%, and 84.27%, respectively. The oldest age group (> 80) had the worst 5DFS (39.88%) followed by the youngest age group (< or = 40, 5DFS = 60.79%). The age groups 41 to 50, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and 71 to 80 years had 5DFSs of 73.22%, 66.87%, 71.53%, and 63.11%, respectively. Analyzed by stage, young (< or = 40 years) women had a worse 5CSS when compared with the other age groups, except for those with Stage I disease. Our results indicate that women 40 years of age and younger have a worse 5CSS than their older counterparts. This difference in survival is not solely a reflection of more advanced disease but may reflect differences in tumor biology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hormone-related factors and risk of breast cancer in relation to estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status.

              Risk factors were examined for subgroups of breast cancer characterized by estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. Data from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, a population-based, North Carolina case-control study of 862 breast cancer cases aged 20-74 years diagnosed during 1993-1996 and 790 controls frequency matched on race and age, were obtained by personal interview. ER and PR status was retrieved from medical records (80%) or was determined in the authors' laboratory (11%) but was missing for 9% of cases. The receptor status distribution was as follows: 53% ER+PR+, 11% ER+PR-, 8% ER-PR+, and 28% ER-PR-. Several hormone-related factors were associated with stronger increased risks for ER+PR+ than for ER-PR- breast cancer: the elevated odds ratios were strongest for ER+PR+ breast cancer among postmenopausal women who had an early age at menarche (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0, 2.4), nulliparity/late age at first full-term pregnancy (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 0.9, 3.2 and OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.0, 2.7, respectively), or a high body mass index (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.9, 3.0) and among pre-/perimenopausal women who had a high waist-hip ratio (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.1). In contrast, family history of breast or ovarian cancer and medical radiation exposure to the chest produced higher odds ratios for ER-PR- than for ER+PR+ breast cancer, especially among pre-/perimenopausal women.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Breast Cancer Res
                Breast Cancer Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1465-5411
                1465-542X
                2005
                16 May 2005
                : 7
                : 4
                : R541-R554
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
                Article
                bcr1198
                10.1186/bcr1198
                1175072
                15987461
                1828570d-cd19-4e00-b9aa-e198b196ab81
                Copyright © 2005 Largent et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 January 2005
                : 25 February 2005
                : 5 April 2005
                : 21 April 2005
                Categories
                Research Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article