10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Avaliação de resultados em rinoplastia de redução Translated title: Results evaluation in reduction rhinoplasty

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          INTRODUÇÃO: A avaliação do resultado final após rinoplastia é um tema pouco estudado pela visão do paciente. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a satisfação dos pacientes submetidos à rinoplastia de redução, a partir do questionário Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE). MÉTODO: Estudo longitudinal, tipo coorte retrospectivo, da satisfação pré-operatória e pós-operatória. A amostra foi composta por 28 pacientes submetidos à rinoplastia que responderam ao questionário ROE. Foram obtidas três variáveis: nota da satisfação que o paciente tinha com sua imagem antes da cirurgia; nota da satisfação com a atual aparência; e a diferença das médias das notas da satisfação entre pós e pré-operatório. RESULTADOS: A nota pós-operatória foi superior a pré-operatória em todos os pacientes. Foi observada diferença entre as médias das notas do pós e pré-operatório de 48,3 (p<0,0001). No pré-operatório foi observado que 100% dos pacientes apresentaram satisfação <50. No pós-operatório foi observado que 92,9% migraram da classe <50 para as classes: 50 a <75 considerado bom (25%); >75 considerado excelente resultado (67,9%). CONCLUSÃO: O questionário ROE é uma ferramenta útil em demonstrar a satisfação do paciente submetido à rinoplastia de redução. Cerca de 92% dos pacientes submetidos à rinoplastia de redução consideram bom ou excelente resultado no pós-operatório.

          Translated abstract

          INTRODUCTION: Final results evaluation after rhinoplasty is a not a topic widely studied from the patient's viewpoint. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the satisfaction of the patients submitted to reduction rhinoplasty, from the questionnaire Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE). METHOD: Longitudinal study, retrospective cut type, of the preoperative and postoperative satisfaction. The sample was composed by 28 patients who were submitted to rhinoplasty and answered the ROE questionnaire. Three variables were obtained: satisfaction note that the patient had with his/her image before the surgery; note of satisfaction with the current appearance; the difference of the average satisfaction notes between postoperative and preoperative approaches. RESULTS: The postoperative note was higher than the preoperative in all patients. We noticed a difference between the average of the postoperative and preoperative of 48.3 (p<0.0001). In the preoperative approach we noticed that 100% of the patients had satisfaction of <50. In the postoperative there was a 92.9% migration from classification <50 to classes: 50 to <75 considered to be good (25%); >75 considered to be an excellent outcome (67.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The ROE questionnaire is a helpful tool to show the satisfaction of the patient submitted to reduction rhinoplasty. About 92% of the patients submitted to reduction rhinoplasty consider the postoperative result to be good or excellent.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature.

          Outcomes research examines the end results of medical interventions, taking into account patients' experiences, preferences, and values. The purpose of assessing outcomes is to provide evidence on which to base clinical decisions. The assessment of outcomes in aesthetic surgery is especially pertinent because patient satisfaction is the predominant factor in determining success. In cosmetic surgery, various scales have been used to assess outcomes. Unfortunately, none of these methods has achieved widespread use. The adoption of broadly accepted, relevant scales to measure outcomes would be advantageous, because this would allow the comparison of techniques, quantification of positive effects, and identification of patients unlikely to benefit from surgery. The purpose of this study was to critically review the present literature to identify the appropriate instruments to assess outcomes in aesthetic surgery. After a comprehensive review of aesthetic surgery outcome instruments, the authors identified body-image and quality-of-life measures to be of the greatest value in determining aesthetic surgery outcomes. These conclusions were based on a critical evaluation of the feasibility, validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of these measures. The Multidimensional Body-States Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ), a psychological assessment of body image, was selected as a potential candidate for further study. Two additional body-image assessment instruments, the Facial Appearance Sorting Test (FAST) and the Breast Chest Ratings Scale (BCRS), may be useful in the assessment of rhinoplasty and breast surgery, respectively. The Derriford Scale (DAS59), an instrument that assesses appearance-related quality of life, was also selected. In addition, the authors recommend the use of a generic, utility-based quality-of-life instrument, such as the Health Utilities Index (HUI) or the EuroQol (EQ-5D).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions.

            R Alsarraf (2024)
            Outcomes research is a fast-growing field of study that focuses on patient-related aspects of medical or surgical outcomes such as satisfaction and quality of life. In the realm of facial plastic surgery, many outcomes are subjective evaluations based on the patient and physician's judgment as to the surgical result, but little has been done to quantify these qualitative results in an objective manner. This paper discusses the basis for outcomes research and suggests its application to the field of facial plastic surgery. Four new facial plastic outcomes instruments have been developed and are provided for the potential use in measuring the quality of life results of rhytidectomy, rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, and skin rejuvenation procedures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Rinoplastia – Estética-Funcional-Reconstrutora.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                aio
                Arquivos Internacionais de Otorrinolaringologia
                Arquivos Int. Otorrinolaringol.
                Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (São Paulo )
                1809-4856
                March 2011
                : 15
                : 1
                : 79-83
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São Paulo Brazil
                [2 ] Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São Paulo Brazil
                Article
                S1809-48722011000100012
                10.1590/S1809-48722011000100012
                18443b56-3f48-40ca-a089-7afe9e9bae4a

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1809-4872&lng=en
                Categories
                OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY

                Otolaryngology
                quality of life,results evaluation,rhinoplasty,patient satisfaction,qualidade de vida,avaliação de resultados,rinoplastia,satisfação do paciente

                Comments

                Comment on this article