20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sexual Health questions included in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study: an international methodological pilot investigation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This paper describes the methodological developments of the sexual health items included in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study since their mandatory inclusion in the study in 2002. The current methodological, ethical and pedagogical challenges in measuring young people’s sexual health behaviours are discussed along with the issues associated with the sexual health items introduced to the HBSC study in 2002. The development and piloting of new cross-national items for use in the 2013/14 HBSC data collection are presented and discussed.

          Methods

          An international pilot study was undertaken to determine the impact of these proposed changes. Questionnaires and classroom discussion groups were conducted in five pilot countries in 2012/2013 (France, Hungary, Ireland, Portugal and Romania) with a total of 612 school-aged children (age M = 15.55 years, SD = 0.95).

          Results

          The majority of participants in each country provided positive feedback about the appropriateness of the questions. Some small cross-national differences were found in the self-reported quantitative data relating to the appropriateness of the questions (χ 2 = 22.831, df = 9, p = .007, V = .117). Qualitative feedback suggests that for the vast majority of students the phrasing and age-targeting of the questions were considered appropriate. With the exception of a small number of respondents who commented on the clarity and/or personal nature of the content, no specific issues with the questions were identified.

          Conclusions

          These findings provide guidance on the answerability (including the extent of missing and inconsistent data), understandability, acceptability (including in different cultures) and relevance of questions to potential participants. The findings from the pilot study suggest that in general, the questions are understandable, acceptable, and of a high priority to the target population, and that the simplification has significantly reduced the proportion of missing data. The new developments thus enhance the capacity of the questions to measure cross-nationally, sensitive aspects of young people’s sexual behaviour. These questions were included in the 2013/2014 round of the HBSC survey and will continue to be used to monitor trends in adolescent sexual health and behaviours, and to inform and influence health services and health education policy and practice at local, national and international levels.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research.

          K Fenton (2001)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children: WHO Collaborative Cross-National (HBSC) study: origins, concept, history and development 1982-2008.

            This paper traces the history of the HBSC study from its origins in the early 1980's to the present day describing how it was first conceptualised scientifically and how this influenced issues of study design. The challenges of managing a cross-national study are explained as are changes and adaptations over time with growth of the study from 3 to over forty country members. The key partnership with the World Health Organisation and its benefits are presented. With developments in scientific management and theoretical perspectives, HBSC has made a substantial contribution to the area of youth health. The last decade has seen increased dissemination to policy makers and evidence that scientific information arising from the study has influenced strategic policy development and practical health improvement programmes. This paper considers some of the key success factors and challenges for the study as it attempts to maximise its scientific output and channels the research findings into health improvement for young people. Future challenges for the study are also considered.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire.

              To assess the test-retest reliability of the 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) questionnaire. A sample of 4,619 male and female high school students from white, black, Hispanic, and other racial/ethnic groups completed the YRBS questionnaire on two occasions approximately two weeks apart. The questionnaire assesses a broad range of health risk behaviors. This study used a protocol that maintained anonymity yet allowed matching of Time-1 and Time-2 responses. The authors computed a kappa statistic for the 72 items measuring health risk behaviors, and compared group prevalence estimates at the two testing occasions. Kappas ranged from 23.6% to 90.5%, with a mean of 60.7% and a median of 60.0%. Kappas did not differ by gender, grade, or race/ethnicity of the respondent. About one in five items (22.2%) had significantly different prevalence estimates at Time 1 vs. Time 2. Ten items, or 13.9%, had both kappas below 61% and significantly different Time-1 and Time-2 prevalence estimates. Overall, students appeared to report health risk behaviors reliably over time, but several items need to be examined further to determine whether they should be revised or deleted in future versions of the YRBS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Youngh6@cardiff.ac.uk
                kolto.andras@ppk.elte.hu
                reispmarta@gmail.com
                elizabeth.saewyc@ubc.ca
                nathalie.moreau@ulb.ac.be
                l.burke2@nuigalway.ie
                apc8@st-andrews.ac.uk
                beat_windlin@bluewin.ch
                Saoirse.nicgabhainn@nuigalway.ie
                emmanuelle.godeau@ac-toulouse.fr
                Journal
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Medical Research Methodology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2288
                5 December 2016
                5 December 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 169
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
                [2 ]National Institute of Health Promotion, Budapest, Hungary
                [3 ]Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Psychology, Budapest, Hungary
                [4 ]Aventura Social - Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, [University of Lisbon], Lisbon, Portugal
                [5 ]ISAMB/Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa [Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon], Lisbon, Portugal
                [6 ]FCT - Fundação para a Tecnologia e Ciência [Foundation for Science and Technology] (SFRH/BPD/110905/2015), Lisbon, Portugal
                [7 ]University of British Columbia, School of Nursing, Vancouver, Canada
                [8 ]Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Service d’Information Promotion Education Santé (SIPES), School of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
                [9 ]Health Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
                [10 ]Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, UK
                [11 ]Addiction Switzerland, Research Department, Lausanne, Switzerland
                [12 ]Service Médical du Rectorat de l’académie de Toulouse, UMR 1027 Inserm, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0664-4002
                Article
                270
                10.1186/s12874-016-0270-8
                5139025
                27919233
                1886f1cb-f48c-4252-b2c7-53d8f858dbde
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 11 February 2016
                : 23 November 2016
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Medicine
                adolescent sexual health,adolescent sexual behaviour,self-completion,questionnaire design inconsistencies,missing data

                Comments

                Comment on this article