48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex Differences in Colorectal Cancer Survival: Population-Based Analysis of 164,996 Colorectal Cancer Patients in Germany

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is considerably higher in men compared to women; however, there is inconclusive evidence of sex differences in CRC prognosis. We aimed to assess and explain sex differences in 5-year relative survival using standard and model-based period analysis among 164,996 patients diagnosed with CRC from 1997 to 2006 and reported to 11 German cancer registries covering a population of 33 million inhabitants. Age-adjusted 5-year relative survival was higher in women (64.5% vs. 61.9%, P<0.0001). A substantial survival advantage of women was confirmed in multivariate analysis after adjusting for CRC stage and subsite in subjects under 65 years of age (relative excess risk, RER 0.86, 95% CI 0.82–0.90), but not in older subjects (RER 1.01, 95% CI 0.98–1.04); this pattern was similar in the 1st and in the 2nd to 5th year after diagnosis. The survival advantage of women varied by CRC stage and age and was most pronounced for localized disease (RERs 0.59–0.88 in various age subgroups) and in patients under 45 years of age (RERs 0.59, 0.72 and 0.76 in patients with localized, regional or advanced disease, respectively). On the contrary, sex differences in survival did not vary by location of CRC. In conclusion, our large population-based study confirmed a survival advantage of female compared to male CRC patients, most notably in young and middle aged patients and patients with localized disease. The effect of sex hormones, either endogenous or through hormonal replacement therapy, might be the most plausible explanation for the observed patterns.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Is there a difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colon cancers?

          The incidence of right-sided colon cancers has been increasing in recent years. It is unclear whether patient prognosis varies by tumor location. In this study, we have compared the survival of right-and left-sided colon cancers in a longitudinal population-based database. A retrospective survival analysis was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database between 1988 and 2003 on subjects who underwent surgical resection for the a primary diagnosis of pathologically confirmed invasive colon adenocarcinoma. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess long-term survival outcomes comparing right-sided (cecum to transverse colon, excluding appendix) versus left-sided (splenic flexure to sigmoid, excluding rectum) colon cancers. A total of 77,978 subjects were identified with adenocarcinoma of the colon. Overall median survival was 83 months. Median survival for right-sided cancers was 78 vs. 89 months for left-sided cancers (P < .001). By Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, controlling for statistically significant confounders, including age, sex, race, marital status, tumor stage, tumor size, histologic grade, number of lymph nodes examined, and year of diagnosis, right-sided colon cancers were associated with a 5% increased mortality risk compared with left-sided colon cancers (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.07). These findings were consistent across subsets of subjects. On the basis of analysis of information from the SEER database, we found that right-sided colon cancers have a worse prognosis than left-sided colon cancers. The reason for this remains unclear but may be due to biological and/or environmental factors and may have particular bearing, given the rising incidence of right-sided colon cancers.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Estrogen plus progestin and colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women.

            Although the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial of estrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women identified more overall health risks than benefits among women in the hormone group, the use of estrogen plus progestin was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of colorectal cancer. We analyzed features of the colorectal cancers that developed and their relation to the characteristics of the participants. In the WHI trial, 16,608 postmenopausal women who were 50 to 79 years of age and had an intact uterus were randomly assigned to a combination of conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg per day) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg per day) or placebo. The main outcome measures were the incidence, stages, and types of colorectal cancer, as determined by blinded central adjudication. There were 43 invasive colorectal cancers in the hormone group and 72 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.81; P=0.003). The invasive colorectal cancers in the hormone group were similar in histologic features and grade to those in the placebo group but with a greater number of positive lymph nodes (mean +/-SD, 3.2+/-4.1 vs. 0.8+/-1.7; P=0.002) and were more advanced (regional or metastatic disease, 76.2 percent vs. 48.5 percent; P=0.004). In exploratory analyses, women in the hormone group with antecedent vaginal bleeding had colorectal cancers with a greater number of positive nodes than women in the hormone group who did not have vaginal bleeding (3.8+/-4.3 vs. 0.7+/-1.5 nodes, P=0.006). Relatively short-term use of estrogen plus progestin was associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer. However, colorectal cancers in women who took estrogen plus progestin were diagnosed at a more advanced stage than those in women who took placebo. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Postmenopausal hormone therapy and the risk of colorectal cancer: a review and meta-analysis.

              Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Accumulating evidence indicates that postmenopausal hormone therapy may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer in women. Through MEDLINE computer searches (January 1966 to September 1998) and a review of references, we identified English-language articles with quantitative data on the relation of postmenopausal hormone therapy to colorectal cancer. We reviewed the studies and made summary estimates of relative risks (RR) by weighting the results of each study in proportion to its precision, using a general variance-based, fixed-effects model. In our meta-analysis of 18 epidemiologic studies of postmenopausal hormone therapy and colorectal cancer, we found a 20% reduction [RR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74 to 0.86] in risk of colon cancer and a 19% decrease (RR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92) in the risk of rectal cancer for postmenopausal women who had ever taken hormone therapy compared with women who never used hormones. Much of the apparent reduction in colorectal cancer was limited to current hormone users (RR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.74). Observational studies suggest a reduced risk of colorectal cancer among women taking postmenopausal hormones. There is biologic evidence to support this association.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                5 July 2013
                : 8
                : 7
                : e68077
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
                [2 ]Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
                [3 ]Cancer Registry of Rhineland-Palatinate, Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
                [4 ]Saarland Cancer Registry, Saarbrücken, Germany
                [5 ]Cancer Registry of Schleswig-Holstein, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
                [6 ]Hamburg Cancer Registry, Ministry for Health and Consumer Protection, Hamburg, Germany
                [7 ]Cancer Registry of Bremen, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
                Sapporo Medical University, Japan
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: HB OM AG LJ. Analyzed the data: OM AG LJ HB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KE BH AK AN AE GEKIDCSWG. Wrote the paper: OM HB LJ AG.

                Membership of the GEKID Cancer Survival Working Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-01910
                10.1371/journal.pone.0068077
                3702575
                23861851
                189d309d-3556-45b8-a9f1-c4a9f253275e
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 14 January 2013
                : 26 May 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                This work was supported by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, www.krebshilfe.de, grant number 108257) and Masaryk University ( www.muni.cz, grant number MUNI/A/0828/2011). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Population Biology
                Epidemiology
                Medicine
                Clinical Research Design
                Retrospective Studies
                Epidemiology
                Cancer Epidemiology
                Oncology
                Cancer Risk Factors
                Hormonal Causes of Cancer
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Gastrointestinal Tumors
                Colon Adenocarcinoma
                Rectal Cancer

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log