2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Distinctive effects of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in regulating neural stem cell fate are mediated via endocannabinoid signalling pathways.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Emerging evidence suggests a complex interplay between the endocannabinoid system, omega-3 fatty acids and the immune system in the promotion of brain self-repair. However, it is unknown if all omega-3 fatty acids elicit similar effects on adult neurogenesis and if such effects are mediated or regulated by interactions with the endocannabinoid system. This study investigated the effects of DHA and EPA on neural stem cell (NSC) fate and the role of the endocannabinoid signalling pathways in these effects. EPA, but not DHA, significantly increased proliferation of NSCs compared to controls, an effect associated with enhanced levels of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG) and p-p38 MAPK, effects attenuated by pre-treatment with CB1 (AM251) or CB2 (AM630) receptor antagonists. Furthermore, in NSCs derived from IL-1β deficient mice, EPA significantly decreased proliferation and p-p38 MAPK levels compared to controls, suggesting a key role for IL-1β signalling in the effects observed. Although DHA similarly increased 2-AG levels in wild-type NSCs, there was no concomitant increase in proliferation or p-p38 MAPK activity. In addition, in NSCs from IL-1β deficient mice, DHA significantly increased proliferation without effects on p-P38 MAPK, suggesting effects of DHA are mediated via alternative signalling pathways. These results provide crucial new insights into the divergent effects of EPA and DHA in regulating NSC proliferation and the pathways involved, and highlight the therapeutic potential of their interplay with endocannabinoid signalling in brain repair.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Neuropharmacology
          Neuropharmacology
          Elsevier BV
          1873-7064
          0028-3908
          Aug 2016
          : 107
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, Whitelands College, London, UK; Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK. Electronic address: sdyall@bournemouth.ac.uk.
          [2 ] Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, Whitelands College, London, UK.
          [3 ] Physiology, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland; Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland; NCBES Centre for Pain Research and Neuroscience Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
          [4 ] Physiology, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland; NCBES Centre for Pain Research and Neuroscience Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
          Article
          S0028-3908(16)30127-7
          10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.03.055
          27044662
          18a1a526-4dba-46a8-83b7-359dfa177bf2
          History

          Eicosapentaenoic acid,Endocannabinoids,Neurogenesis,CB1 cannabinoid receptor,CB2 cannabinoid receptor,Docosahexaenoic acid

          Comments

          Comment on this article