12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nursing students’ experiences of a pedagogical transition from campus learning to distance learning using digital tools

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The use of distance education using digital tools in higher education has increased over the last decade, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study aimed to describe and evaluate nursing students’ experiences of the pedagogical transition from traditional campus based learning to distance learning using digital tools.

          Methods

          The nursing course Symptom and signs of illness underwent a transition from campus based education to distance learning using digital tools because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This pedagogical transition in teaching was evaluated using both quantitative and qualitative data analysis. Focus group interviews ( n = 9) were analysed using qualitative content analysis to explore students’ experiences of the pedagogical transition and to construct a web-based questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised 14 items, including two open-ended questions. The questionnaire was delivered to all course participants and responses were obtained from 96 of 132 students (73%). Questionnaire data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comments from the open-ended questions were used as quotes to highlight the quantitative data.

          Results

          The analysis of the focus group interviews extracted three main dimensions: didactic aspects of digital teaching, study environment, and students’ own resources. Social interaction was an overall theme included in all three dimensions. Data from the questionnaire showed that a majority of students preferred campus based education and experienced deterioration in all investigated dimensions after the pedagogical transition. However, approximately one-third of the students appeared to prefer distance learning using digital tools.

          Conclusions

          The main finding was that the pedagogical transition to distance education reduced the possibility for students’ social interactions in their learning process. This negatively affected several aspects of their experience of distance learning using digital tools, such as reduced motivation. However, the heterogeneity in the responses suggested that a blended learning approach may offer pedagogical benefits while maintaining an advantageous level of social interaction.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-021-00542-1.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.

          Qualitative content analysis as described in published literature shows conflicting opinions and unsolved issues regarding meaning and use of concepts, procedures and interpretation. This paper provides an overview of important concepts (manifest and latent content, unit of analysis, meaning unit, condensation, abstraction, content area, code, category and theme) related to qualitative content analysis; illustrates the use of concepts related to the research procedure; and proposes measures to achieve trustworthiness (credibility, dependability and transferability) throughout the steps of the research procedure. Interpretation in qualitative content analysis is discussed in light of Watzlawick et al.'s [Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London] theory of communication.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education.

              To determine whether the use of an online or blended learning paradigm has the potential to enhance the teaching of clinical skills in undergraduate nursing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ulrica.langegard@gu.se
                kiana.kiani@gu.se
                susanne.nielsen@gu.se
                per-arne.svensson@gu.se
                Journal
                BMC Nurs
                BMC Nurs
                BMC Nursing
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6955
                19 January 2021
                19 January 2021
                2021
                : 20
                : 23
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.8761.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, ; Arvid Wallgrens backe, Box 457, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
                [2 ]GRID grid.8761.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, , Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, ; Gothenburg, Sweden
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-579X
                Article
                542
                10.1186/s12912-021-00542-1
                7814979
                33468132
                18aea162-9b31-43a0-b3be-ab7c5f14ab34
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 21 July 2020
                : 6 January 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Gothenburg
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Nursing
                teaching [mesh],education, professional [mesh],distance learning, digital tools, quantitative method, qualitative method, social interaction [mesh],blended learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article