3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hearing loss in inner ear and systemic autoimmune disease: A systematic review of post‐cochlear implantation outcomes

      review-article
      , MBChB 1 , , BSc, BMBS 2 , , MSc, FRCS(ORL‐HNS) 3 , 4 , , MSc, FRCS, FRCSC 4 , 5 , , , MSc, FRCS(ORL‐HNS) 3
      Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
      John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
      autoimmune inner ear disease, Cochlear implants, sensorineural hearing loss, systematic review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To assess outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with hearing loss secondary to primary or secondary autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED).

          Methods

          A systematic review and narrative synthesis was completed according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits were placed on year of publication or language.

          Results

          A total of 551 studies were identified, of which 29 were included after removal of duplicates, and screening the title, abstract, and full text. All except one study were OCEBM grade IV. 114 of 115 patients displayed improvement in hearing following cochlear implantation. With implant use, roughly a third of these patients had hearing that improved over time, a third improved and plateaued, and a third remained stable. There was no additional risk of perioperative complications found in AIED patients compared what is generally accepted in general cochlear implantation, although two episodes of device failure after 6 months were noted, and four patients with secondary AIED displayed poor initial audiological outcomes.

          Conclusion

          CI in both primary and secondary AIED provides marked improvement in hearing. Early CI may be a valid management option, provide long‐lasting hearing in patients and reduce the side effects of long‐term systemic immunosuppressants. However, patients should be counseled residual hearing may be lost if there is cochlear ossification or fibrosis which may make implant insertion more traumatic.

          Level of Evidence

          NA.

          Abstract

          Autoimmune inner ear disease is characterised by bilateral, assymetrical, progressive (or fluctuating) hearing loss that develops over weeks to months and is steroid responsive. Cochlear implantation has been suggested as a useful intervention in this group when medical management fails, however there is limited data in the literature. This review aims to systematically review all available evidence of post‐cochlear implantation hearing outcomes in patients with autoimmune inner ear disease to assess its benefit.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Autoimmune Sensorineural Hearing Loss

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cochlear implantation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            Sensorineural hearing loss is the third leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Cochlear implants may provide a viable alternative to hearing aids for this type of hearing loss. The Coverage and Analysis Group at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was interested in an evaluation of recently published literature on this topic. In addition, this meta-analysis is to our knowledge the first to evaluate quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in adults with cochlear implants.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The importance of electrode location in cochlear implantation

              Objectives As indications for cochlear implantation have expanded to include patients with more residual hearing, increasing emphasis has been placed on minimally traumatic electrode insertion. Histopathologic evaluation remains the gold standard for evaluation of cochlear trauma, but advances in imaging techniques have allowed clinicians to determine scalar electrode location in vivo. This review will examine the relationship between scalar location of electrode arrays and audiologic outcomes. In addition, the impact that surgical approach, electrode design, and insertion depth have on scalar location will be evaluated. Data Sources: PubMed literature review Review Methods: A review of the current literature was conducted to analyze the relationship between scalar location of cochlear implant electrode arrays and speech perception outcomes. Further, data were reviewed to determine the impact that surgical variables have on scalar electrode location. Results Electrode insertions into the scala tympani are associated with superior speech perception and higher rates of hearing preservation. Lateral wall electrodes, and round window/extended round window approaches appear to maximize the likelihood of a scala tympani insertion. It does not appear that deeper insertions are associated with higher rates of scalar translocation. Conclusion Superior audiologic outcomes are observed for electrode arrays inserted entirely within the scala tympani. The majority of clinical data demonstrate that lateral wall design and a round window approach increase the likelihood of a scala tympani insertion. Level of Evidence N/A.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mlb59@cam.ac.uk
                Journal
                Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol
                Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2378-8038
                LIO2
                Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                2378-8038
                04 May 2021
                June 2021
                : 6
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/lio2.v6.3 )
                : 469-487
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] South Warwickshire Foundation Trust Warwick UK
                [ 2 ] University Hospitals of North Midlands Stoke‐on Trent UK
                [ 3 ] University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
                [ 4 ] University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
                [ 5 ] Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Manohar Bance, University of Cambridge/Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

                Email: mlb59@ 123456cam.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8806-8066
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2993-9495
                Article
                LIO2563
                10.1002/lio2.563
                8223457
                34195369
                18dfeffb-bdd9-4c46-8a66-607d057dd7ec
                © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 15 March 2021
                : 06 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Pages: 19, Words: 10297
                Categories
                Review
                Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:24.06.2021

                autoimmune inner ear disease,cochlear implants,sensorineural hearing loss,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article