14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Laying the foundations of evolutionary and systematic studies in crickets (Insecta, Orthoptera): a multilocus phylogenetic analysis.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Orthoptera have been used for decades for numerous evolutionary questions but several of its constituent groups, notably crickets, still suffer from a lack of a robust phylogenetic hypothesis. We propose the first phylogenetic hypothesis for the evolution of crickets sensu lato, based on analysis of 205 species, representing 88% of the subfamilies and 71% tribes currently listed in the database Orthoptera Species File (OSF). We reconstructed parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenies using fragments of 18S, 28SA, 28SD, H3, 12S, 16S, and cytb (~3600 bp). Our results support the monophyly of the cricket clade, and its subdivision into two clades: mole crickets and ant-loving crickets on the one hand, and all the other crickets on the other (i.e. crickets sensu stricto). Crickets sensu stricto form seven monophyletic clades, which support part of the OSF families, "subfamily groups", or subfamilies: the mole crickets (OSF Gryllotalpidae), the scaly crickets (OSF Mogoplistidae), and the true crickets (OSF Gryllidae) are recovered as monophyletic. Among the 22 sampled subfamilies, only six are monophyletic: Gryllotalpinae, Trigonidiinae, Pteroplistinae, Euscyrtinae, Oecanthinae, and Phaloriinae. Most of the 37 tribes sampled are para- or polyphyletic. We propose the best-supported clades as backbones for future definitions of familial groups, validating some taxonomic hypotheses proposed in the past. These clades fit variously with the morphological characters used today to identify crickets. Our study emphasizes the utility of a classificatory system that accommodates diagnostic characters and monophyletic units of evolution. Moreover, the phylogenetic hypotheses proposed by the present study open new perspectives for further evolutionary research, especially on acoustic communication and biogeography.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Cladistics
          Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society
          Wiley
          1096-0031
          0748-3007
          Feb 2016
          : 32
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB - UMR 7205 CNRS, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, CP 50, 45, rue Buffon, Paris, 75005, France.
          [2 ] INCI, UPR3212 CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, 21, rue René Descartes, Strasbourg, F-67084, France.
          [3 ] Service de Systématique Moléculaire, UMS2700 MNHN-CNRS, Département Systématique et Evolution, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris Cedex 05, France.
          Article
          10.1111/cla.12114
          34732023
          18e0b839-2cec-4fd8-965e-1c5397789142
          © The Willi Hennig Society 2015.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article