4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The science guiding design and evaluation of restoration interventions in tropical landscapes is dominated by ecological processes and outcomes and lacks indicators and methods that integrate human wellbeing into the restoration process. We apply a new systems approach framework for tree restoration in forest-agricultural landscapes to show how this shortcoming can be addressed. Demonstrating ‘proof of concept’, we tested statistical models underlying the framework pathways with data collected from a case study in Tanzania. Local community perceptions of nature's values were not affected by levels of self-reported wildlife-induced crop damage. But mapped predictions from the systems approach under a tree restoration scenario suggested differential outcomes for biodiversity indicators and altered spatial patterns of crop damage risk, expected to jeopardize human wellbeing. The predictions map anticipated trade-offs in costs and benefits of restoration scenarios, which we have started to explore with stakeholders to identify restoration opportunities that consider local knowledge, value systems and human wellbeing. We suggest that the framework be applied to other landscapes to identify commonalities and differences in forest landscape restoration outcomes under varying governance and land use systems. This should form a foundation for evidence-based implementation of the global drive for forest landscape restoration, at local scales.

          This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Natural climate solutions

          Significance Most nations recently agreed to hold global average temperature rise to well below 2 °C. We examine how much climate mitigation nature can contribute to this goal with a comprehensive analysis of “natural climate solutions” (NCS): 20 conservation, restoration, and/or improved land management actions that increase carbon storage and/or avoid greenhouse gas emissions across global forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands. We show that NCS can provide over one-third of the cost-effective climate mitigation needed between now and 2030 to stabilize warming to below 2 °C. Alongside aggressive fossil fuel emissions reductions, NCS offer a powerful set of options for nations to deliver on the Paris Climate Agreement while improving soil productivity, cleaning our air and water, and maintaining biodiversity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The global tree restoration potential

            The restoration of trees remains among the most effective strategies for climate change mitigation. We mapped the global potential tree coverage to show that 4.4 billion hectares of canopy cover could exist under the current climate. Excluding existing trees and agricultural and urban areas, we found that there is room for an extra 0.9 billion hectares of canopy cover, which could store 205 gigatonnes of carbon in areas that would naturally support woodlands and forests. This highlights global tree restoration as our most effective climate change solution to date. However, climate change will alter this potential tree coverage. We estimate that if we cannot deviate from the current trajectory, the global potential canopy cover may shrink by ~223 million hectares by 2050, with the vast majority of losses occurring in the tropics. Our results highlight the opportunity of climate change mitigation through global tree restoration but also the urgent need for action.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              EltonTraits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world's birds and mammals

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                RSTB
                royptb
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                January 2, 2023
                November 14, 2022
                November 14, 2022
                : 378
                : 1867 , Theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’ compiled and edited by Andrew R. Marshall, Lindsay F. Banin, Marion Pfeifer, Catherine E. Waite, Sarobidy Rakotonarivo, Susan Chomba and Robin L. Chazdon
                : 20210111
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Modelling, Evidence and Policy RG, SNES, Newcastle University, , Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
                [ 2 ]School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds , Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, , York YO10 5NG, UK
                [ 4 ] Forest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, , Sunshine Coast, QLD 4556, Australia
                [ 5 ] Department of Ecosystem and Conservation, Sokoine University of Agriculture, , PO Box 3010, Morogoro, Tanzania
                [ 6 ] Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, , Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
                [ 7 ] Southern Tanzania Elephant Program, , PO Box 2494, Iringa, Tanzania
                [ 8 ] Entomology, National Museums Kenya, , PO Box 40658-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
                [ 9 ] IUCN Centre for Economy and Finance, , Washington DC, USA
                [ 10 ] Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, , Pretoria 0028, South Africa
                [ 11 ] M.A.P Scientific Services, , Pretoria 0145, South Africa
                [ 12 ] College of Science and Engineering, University of Edinburgh, , Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
                Author notes
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-3141
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3261-7326
                Article
                rstb20210111
                10.1098/rstb.2021.0111
                9661959
                36373913
                18e5cf42-eaec-499d-accd-93c2eb4e4ab0
                © 2022 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : July 25, 2021
                : November 11, 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268;
                Award ID: BB/S014586/1
                Categories
                1001
                60
                207
                69
                Part II: Restoration Planning and Evaluation
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                January 2, 2023

                Philosophy of science
                ecosystem services,ecosystem disservices,predictive modelling,systems modelling,forest landscape restoration,coupled human and natural systems

                Comments

                Comment on this article