14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contributions to the functional morphology of caudate skulls: kinetic and akinetic forms

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A strongly ossified and rigid skull roof, which prevents parietal kinesis, has been reported for the adults of all amphibian clades. Our μ-CT investigations revealed that the Buresch’s newt ( Triturus ivanbureschi) possess a peculiar cranial construction. In addition to the typical amphibian pleurokinetic articulation between skull roof and palatoquadrate associated structures, we found flexible connections between nasals and frontals (prokinesis), vomer and parasphenoid (palatokinesis), and between frontals and parietals (mesokinesis). This is the first description of mesokinesis in urodelans. The construction of the skull in the Buresch’s newts also indicates the presence of an articulation between parietals and the exocipitals, discussed as a possible kind of metakinesis. The specific combination of pleuro-, pro-, meso-, palato-, and metakinetic skull articulations indicate to a new kind of kinetic systems unknown for urodelans to this date. We discuss the possible neotenic origin of the skull kinesis and pose the hypothesis that the kinesis in T. ivanbureschi increases the efficiency of fast jaw closure. For that, we compared the construction of the skull in T. ivanbureschi to the akinetic skull of the Common fire salamander Salamandra salamandra. We hypothesize that the design of the skull in the purely terrestrial living salamander shows a similar degree of intracranial mobility. However, this mobility is permitted by elasticity of some bones and not by true articulation between them. We comment on the possible relation between the skull construction and the form of prey shaking mechanism that the species apply to immobilize their victims.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Phylogeny and biogeography of the family Salamandridae (Amphibia: Caudata) inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes.

          Phylogenetic relationships of members of the salamander family Salamandridae were examined using complete mitochondrial genomes collected from 42 species representing all 20 salamandrid genera and five outgroup taxa. Weighted maximum parsimony, partitioned maximum likelihood, and partitioned Bayesian approaches all produce an identical, well-resolved phylogeny; most branches are strongly supported with greater than 90% bootstrap values and 1.0 Bayesian posterior probabilities. Our results support recent taxonomic changes in finding the traditional genera Mertensiella, Euproctus, and Triturus to be non-monophyletic species assemblages. We successfully resolved the current polytomy at the base of the salamandrid tree: the Italian newt genus Salamandrina is sister to all remaining salamandrids. Beyond Salamandrina, a clade comprising all remaining newts is separated from a clade containing the true salamanders. Among these newts, the branching orders of well-supported clades are: primitive newts (Echinotriton, Pleurodeles, and Tylototriton), New World newts (Notophthalmus-Taricha), Corsica-Sardinia newts (Euproctus), and modern European newts (Calotriton, Lissotriton, Mesotriton, Neurergus, Ommatotriton, and Triturus) plus modern Asian newts (Cynops, Pachytriton, and Paramesotriton).Two alternative sets of calibration points and two Bayesian dating methods (BEAST and MultiDivTime) were used to estimate timescales for salamandrid evolution. The estimation difference by dating methods is slight and we propose two sets of timescales based on different calibration choices. The two timescales suggest that the initial diversification of extant salamandrids took place in Europe about 97 or 69Ma. North American salamandrids were derived from their European ancestors by dispersal through North Atlantic Land Bridges in the Late Cretaceous ( approximately 69Ma) or Middle Eocene ( approximately 43Ma). Ancestors of Asian salamandrids most probably dispersed to the eastern Asia from Europe, after withdrawal of the Turgai Sea ( approximately 29Ma).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A functional consideration of cranial kinesis in lizards.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              Aquatic Feeding in Salamanders

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Francisco, USA )
                2167-8359
                20 September 2016
                2016
                : 4
                : e2392
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Natural Science, Shumen University , Shumen, Bulgaria
                [2 ]Department of Integrative Zoology, Vienna University , Vienna, Austria
                [3 ]VetCore Facility for Research, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien , Vienna, Austria
                [4 ]Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences , Sofia, Bulgaria
                [5 ]Section Vertebrates, National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences , Sofia, Bulgaria
                [6 ]Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment (HEP), Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany
                [7 ]Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany
                [8 ]Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institute für Evolutions- and Biodiversitätsforschung, Humboldt Universität Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                Article
                2392
                10.7717/peerj.2392
                5036112
                27688958
                1905a7b7-2ce8-4412-b6d4-d7c61ae56a8f
                © 2016 Natchev et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 24 May 2016
                : 1 August 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: Biology Department at Shumen University
                Award ID: RD-08-66/02.02.2016
                The study was partly supported by the Project number: RD-08-66/02.02.2016 of the Biology Department at Shumen University. We acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen. We thank the “Fund for Support of the issue of publication in journals with Impact Factor (IF) and Impact Rang (SJR)” at Konstantin Preslavsky University Shumen. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Animal Behavior
                Biodiversity
                Bioengineering
                Taxonomy
                Zoology

                feeding,skull kinesis,μct scanning,urodela,habitat shift,prey shaking

                Comments

                Comment on this article