4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Technology Experience of Solid Organ Transplant Patients and Their Overall Willingness to Use Interactive Health Technology : Interactive Health Technology in Transplantation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d5693748e151">The use of interactive health technology (IHT) is a promising pathway to tackle self-management problems experienced by many chronically ill patients, including solid organ transplant (Tx) patients. Yet, to ensure that the IHT is accepted and used, a human-centered design process is needed, actively involving end users in all steps of the development process. A first critical, predevelopment step involves understanding end users' characteristics. This study therefore aims to (a) select an IHT platform to deliver a self-management support intervention most closely related to Tx patients' current use of information and communication technologies (ICTs), (b) understand Tx patients' overall willingness to use IHT for self-management support, and investigate associations with relevant technology acceptance variables, and (c) explore Tx patients' views on potential IHT features. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Self-management interventions for chronic illness.

          An increasing number of interventions have been developed for patients to better manage their chronic illnesses. They are characterised by substantial responsibility taken by patients, and are commonly referred to as self-management interventions. We examine the background, content, and efficacy of such interventions for type 2 diabetes, arthritis, and asthma. Although the content and intensity of the programmes were affected by the objectives of management of the illness, the interventions differed substantially even within the three illnesses. When comparing across conditions, it is important to recognise the different objectives of the interventions and the complexity of the issues that they are attempting to tackle. For both diabetes and asthma, the objectives are concerned with the underlying control of the condition with clear strategies to achieve the desired outcome. By contrast, strategies to deal with symptoms of pain and the consequences of disability in arthritis can be more complex. The interventions that were efficacious provide some guidance as to the components needed in future programmes to achieve the best results. But to ensure that these results endure over time remains an important issue for self-management interventions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology.

            A systematic literature review was performed to identify variables promoting consumer health information technology (CHIT) acceptance among patients. The electronic bibliographic databases Web of Science, Business Source Elite, CINAHL, Communication and Mass Media Complete, MEDLINE, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo were searched. A cited reference search of articles meeting the inclusion criteria was also conducted to reduce misses. Fifty-two articles met the selection criteria. Among them, 94 different variables were tested for associations with acceptance. Most of those tested (71%) were patient factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, health- and treatment-related variables, and prior experience or exposure to computer/health technology. Only ten variables were related to human-technology interaction; 16 were organizational factors; and one was related to the environment. In total, 62 (66%) were found to predict acceptance in at least one study. Existing literature focused largely on patient-related factors. No studies examined the impact of social and task factors on acceptance, and few tested the effects of organizational or environmental factors on acceptance. Future research guided by technology acceptance theories should fill those gaps to improve our understanding of patient CHIT acceptance, which in turn could lead to better CHIT design and implementation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirtieth Adult Lung and Heart-Lung Transplant Report--2013; focus theme: age.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Nursing Scholarship
                Journal of Nursing Scholarship
                Wiley
                15276546
                March 2018
                March 2018
                November 28 2017
                : 50
                : 2
                : 151-162
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery; Department of Public Health and Primary Care; KU Leuven; Leuven Belgium
                [2 ]Meaningful Interactions Lab (Mintlab); imec, KU Leuven; Leuven Belgium
                [3 ]ITech; UC Leuven-Limburg; Leuven Belgium
                [4 ]School of Nursing; Department of Acute and Tertiary Care; University of Pittsburgh; Pittsburgh USA
                [5 ]Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and; Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health University of Basel; Basel Switzerland
                [6 ]Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health; University of Basel; Basel Switzerland
                Article
                10.1111/jnu.12362
                29193654
                190d7ebb-e799-487a-80f5-9b849ee29460
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,194

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors565