31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Andrographis paniculata in the symptomatic treatment of uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infection: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

      , , , ,
      Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To assess the efficacy of Andrographis paniculata in the symptomatic treatment of uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infection. Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Mean difference in the reduction in symptom severity scores between treatment and control groups was calculated to obtain an overall estimate of effect. Four studies met our inclusion criteria and were reviewed. A total of 433 patients reported in three trials were included in the statistical analysis. Andrographis paniculata fixed combination with Acanthopanax senticosus was more effective than placebo. The mean difference was 2.13 points (95% CI 1.00-3.26 points, P=0.0002) on the symptom severity score. The difference in effects between A. paniculata and placebo was 10.85 points (95% CI 10.36-11.34 points, P<0.0001) in favour of A. paniculata. Current evidence suggests that A. paniculata extract alone or in combination with A. senticosus extract may be more effective than placebo and may be an appropriate alternative treatment of uncomplicated acute upper respiratory tract infection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Meta-analysis in clinical trials

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

              Meta-analysis provides a systematic and quantitative approach to the summary of results from randomized studies. Whilst many authors have published actual meta-analyses concerning specific therapeutic questions, less has been published about comprehensive methodology. This article presents a general parametric approach, which utilizes efficient score statistics and Fisher's information, and relates this to different methods suggested by previous authors. Normally distributed, binary, ordinal and survival data are considered. Both the fixed effects and random effects model for treatments are described.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
                J Clin Pharm Ther
                Wiley
                0269-4727
                1365-2710
                February 2004
                February 2004
                : 29
                : 1
                : 37-45
                Article
                10.1046/j.1365-2710.2003.00534.x
                14748896
                1911e603-a96c-4964-8733-e1ddf43dd1fb
                © 2004

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article