61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Preventing Suicide in Rural Communities During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

      article-commentary

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Individuals in rural communities are at increased risk for suicide. 1 , 2 While the impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) continues to unfold, 3 it is likely that suicide risk factors among individuals residing in rural areas will be exacerbated and suicide rates may subsequently increase. 4 Awareness of these factors is essential to ensure that appropriate steps are taken to prevent suicide in rural communities, both during and in the aftermath of this pandemic. In this commentary, we delineate key considerations for doing so, with potential solutions summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Challenges and Potential Strategies for Mitigating Suicide Risk in Rural Communities During the COVID‐19 Pandemic Challenge Potential Solutions Exacerbation of interpersonal risk factors for suicide due to physical distancing requirements and psychosocial stressors during COVID‐19 (eg, social isolation, loneliness, lack of connection, perceived burdensomeness, interpersonal violence) Maintain social connectedness through virtual and phone communications or while outdoors (eg, in nature) Engage in meaningful, value‐driven activities that promote “pulling together” as communities (eg, remote volunteering, helping more vulnerable community members) Ensure that COVID‐19 survivors are not stigmatized or discriminated against Disseminate information regarding free web‐based applications to cope with interpersonal stress (eg, AIMS for Anger Management, Mood Coach, Parenting2Go, Stair Coach a ) Messaging about interpersonal violence resources within rural communities and nationally (eg, National Domestic Violence Hotline, National Sexual Assault Telephone Hotline, Childhelp National Child Abuse Hotline) and actions (eg, safety planning) Disseminate resources and support to facilitate parental coping and appropriate disciplinary strategies during periods of stress Increase interpersonal violence screening by healthcare providers Increased access to firearms when acute suicide risk may be elevated Education regarding safe firearm storage practices and potential risks for new firearm owners Public health messaging that communicates the risks of firearm access when suicide risk is elevated, as well as the benefits of safe firearm storage (eg, locked, unloaded) Increase options for temporarily reducing firearm access for individuals at elevated risk for suicide (eg, adding and communicating options for safe temporary storage in rural communities) Ensure that healthcare providers are assessing firearm access among individuals at increased risk for suicide Increase access to free firearm locks and safes Onset or exacerbation of mental health symptoms due to COVID‐19 related concerns and distancing, while access to mental healthcare may be decreased Destigmatization of mental health care (eg, public health messaging about the importance) Public health messaging regarding how to obtain mental health care (eg, telehealth) and crisis support (eg, national and local crisis lines) Virtual or telehealth individual or group sessions Disseminate free web‐based applications to facilitate psychoeducation and treatment (eg, Life Armor), symptom management (eg, PTSD Coach, CBT‐i Coach a ), stress reduction and coping (eg, Mindfulness Coach, Breathe2Relax, Moving Forward), and suicide prevention (eg, Virtual Hope Box, Safety Plan Mobile App). a Intended to be used in conjunction with professional treatment. CBT‐I, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency. Interpersonal Factors First and foremost, interpersonal factors are well‐established risk factors for suicide, including social isolation, 5 , 6 loneliness, 6 lack of belonging, 7 and perceived burdensomeness. 7 , 8 Residents of rural communities are more likely to experience social isolation, relative to those living in urban communities. 9 As rural areas tend to be less densely populated, social support can be more difficult to obtain during acute suicidal crises. These interpersonal risk factors for suicide are likely to be exacerbated amidst the current pandemic, especially among vulnerable populations (eg, those who are elderly or immunosuppressed), who may experience greater physical isolation due to concerns about infection. 10 , 11 Life‐saving physical distancing i policies aimed at “flattening the curve” 12 may also inadvertently exacerbate social isolation, thwarted belongingness, and perceived burdensomness. 13 , 14 For example, quarantine, mandatory teleworking requirements, and community‐based closures may prompt social isolation, as well as decreased belongingness and increased burdensomness. 13 , 14 In addition, major stressors, such as housing instability, 15 unemployment, 16 and health‐related concerns 17 characteristic of this pandemic may increase perceived burdensomeness and risk for suicide. 18 , 19 Another key interpersonal risk factor that also may be exacerbated during the COVID‐19 pandemic is interpersonal violence (ie, physical or sexual violence, such as childhood abuse or intimate partner violence), 20 , 21 which is associated with increased risk for suicide. 22 This is particularly concerning for those living in rural communities, where intimate partner violence tends to be more severe, chronic, and is associated with worse health and psychosocial outcomes, 23 compared to urban settings. Unfortunately, resources for addressing interpersonal violence in rural communities are more limited, with more barriers to help‐seeking (eg, confidentiality concerns, local politics, distance), greater areas of need for specific services, 24 and cultural norms that can deter disclosure and help‐seeking. 23 Thus, it will be critical to address these interpersonal risk factors for suicide in rural communities during and following the COVID‐19 pandemic. Finding alternate ways to decrease social isolation and maintain connectedness and belongingness while adhering to physical distancing is paramount. Although telephone and virtual communication can be used to maintain social connectedness, many individuals in rural communities lack reliable access to high‐speed Internet. 25 Consequently, accomplishing and maintaining social interaction in rural communities may require nuanced and creative solutions. One potential strategy involves engaging in social interactions outdoors while adhering to physical distancing guidelines, which may be more feasible in rural areas since they often maintain open space. In addition to potentially increasing social connectedness, being outdoors also may help to bolster mood 26 and promote mental health. 27 , 28 Rural communities could also set up means of identifying individuals who are vulnerable or struggling to ensure that they feel connected and cared for. Helping individuals to derive a sense of purpose is also critical to offsetting the perceived burdensomeness that can accompany major financial stressors and health concerns. 17 , 29 , 30 “Pulling together” by collectively engaging into meaningful, value‐driven activity during crises can attenuate the impact of perceived burdensomeness, while concurrently increasing belongingness. 31 It can also promote resilience, 32 and individual and collective sense of control. 30 Moreover, as individuals experience a greater sense of purpose, meaning, and connectedness, they are more likely to experience decreased risk for suicidal ideation and suicidal self‐directed violence. 32 , 33 , 34 Thus, providing rural communities with the resources to come together to increase sense of purpose, while simultaneously protecting the most vulnerable community members from infection, is integral. One option for beginning to address this is for rural communities to create opportunities for remote volunteering (eg, fundraising or providing supplies for individuals who are unable to leave their homes) through local organizations or grassroots efforts. Of note, it may be particularly important for communities to come up with specific solutions themselves, both to increase efficacy in doing so as well as to increase feasibility and sustainability of different community‐based efforts. To address interpersonal violence, rural communities can disseminate information regarding interpersonal violence resources, such as toll‐free hotlines, chat lines, and community‐based clinics and services. Rural providers can also increase efforts to screen their patients for interpersonal violence and ensure that those with histories of interpersonal violence have safety plans available. Beginning a conversation about interpersonal violence as a community also may be key to decreasing stigma and increasing the likelihood that rural community members who experience interpersonal violence will seek help for these experiences, whether formally or through other community supports (eg, family, friends). Access to Firearms Another key risk factor for suicide that may be exacerbated during the COVID‐19 pandemic involves access to firearms, 35 , 36 the leading means of suicide in rural communities. 37 Individuals in rural communities are more likely to own firearms, including multiple firearms. 38 Recent media reports have described individuals acquiring firearms and ammunition as a result of fears regarding COVID‐19. 39 Thus, previous firearm owners may have obtained additional firearms and ammunition, while the number of firearm owners overall has likely increased. This is particularly concerning given the stressful nature of the current pandemic, including exacerbation of key risk factors and potential decrease in protective factors. Thus, another key consideration for preventing suicide in rural communities during the COVID‐19 pandemic entails increasing safe firearm‐related behaviors. This would align with national suicide prevention recommendations more broadly, which include reducing access to lethal means, such as firearms, for populations at increased suicide risk or during periods of elevated risk for suicide. 40 , 41 Moreover, this is a critical time to ensure that knowledge regarding the risk associated with firearm access is disseminated to rural communities. It may be particularly important to implement public health messaging that communicates the benefits associated with safe firearm storage (eg, locked, unloaded), 42 as well as options for temporarily reducing firearm access for individuals at elevated risk for suicide. 43 , 44 Mental Health and Access to Care Finally, mental health symptoms and diagnoses are well‐established risk factors for suicide, 45 and there is the potential for onset or exacerbation of mental health symptoms during the COVID‐19 pandemic—whether due to fear and anxiety regarding infection, or the prolonged physical distancing, disruptions, and uncertainty created by this unprecedented and potentially lethal pandemic. 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 This may disproportionately affect individuals in rural communities, who already experience increased stigma regarding mental health, suicide, and help‐seeking. 50 , 51 , 52 Furthermore, due to existing shortages of mental health providers in rural communities, many individuals in rural areas rely upon primary care providers to provide mental health screening, resources, and treatment. 53 , 54 , 55 However, concerns about infection and triaging the most medically severe patients during the COVID‐19 outbreak may further strain primary care providers’ ability to provide such services. Ensuring that individuals in rural communities have access to mental health care during and following the COVID‐19 pandemic will be a challenge. Addressing this may include increasing dissemination of public health messaging regarding avenues for obtaining mental health care (eg, telehealth) and crisis support (eg, national and local crisis lines) in rural communities, as well as continued destigmatization of mental health care. Family and friends can encourage one another to seek treatment if experiencing emotional distress and can share their own experiences with seeking help. Increasing dissemination of free web‐based applications may also help to facilitate coping for a broad range of concerns. In addition, this is likely a particularly important time for rural health care providers to screen for mental health symptoms (eg, depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, substance use). For rural patients most at risk, ensuring continued access to mental health care (eg, telehealth) will be key. In sum, individuals in rural communities may be disproportionately impacted by the COVID‐19 pandemic. 56 Many of these risk factors for suicide can interact with one another to further compound risk. Nonetheless, many of these solutions also may be synergistic in potentially mitigating these risks. Ensuring that rural communities are adequately equipped to prevent suicide while managing the spread and impact of COVID‐19 is critical.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China

          Highlights • Methods of guiding students to effectively and appropriately regulate their emotions during public health emergencies and avoid losses caused by crisis events have become an urgent problem for colleges and universities. Therefore, we investigated and analyzed the mental health status of college students during the epidemic for the following purposes. (1) To evaluate the mental situation of college students during the epidemic; (2) to provide a theoretical basis for psychological interventions with college students; and (3) to provide a basis for the promulgation of national and governmental policies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed

            The 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia, believed to have originated in a wet market in Wuhan, Hubei province, China at the end of 2019, has gained intense attention nationwide and globally. To lower the risk of further disease transmission, the authority in Wuhan suspended public transport indefinitely from Jan 23, 2020; similar measures were adopted soon in many other cities in China. As of Jan 25, 2020, 30 Chinese provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions covering over 1·3 billion people have initiated first-level responses to major public health emergencies. A range of measures has been urgently adopted,1, 2 such as early identification and isolation of suspected and diagnosed cases, contact tracing and monitoring, collection of clinical data and biological samples from patients, dissemination of regional and national diagnostic criteria and expert treatment consensus, establishment of isolation units and hospitals, and prompt provision of medical supplies and external expert teams to Hubei province. The emergence of the 2019-nCoV pneumonia has parallels with the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which was caused by another coronavirus that killed 349 of 5327 patients with confirmed infection in China. 3 Although the diseases have different clinical presentations,1, 4 the infectious cause, epidemiological features, fast transmission pattern, and insufficient preparedness of health authorities to address the outbreaks are similar. So far, mental health care for the patients and health professionals directly affected by the 2019-nCoV epidemic has been under-addressed, although the National Health Commission of China released the notification of basic principles for emergency psychological crisis interventions for the 2019-nCoV pneumonia on Jan 26, 2020. 5 This notification contained a reference to mental health problems and interventions that occurred during the 2003 SARS outbreak, and mentioned that mental health care should be provided for patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonitis, close contacts, suspected cases who are isolated at home, patients in fever clinics, families and friends of affected people, health professionals caring for infected patients, and the public who are in need. To date, epidemiological data on the mental health problems and psychiatric morbidity of those suspected or diagnosed with the 2019-nCoV and their treating health professionals have not been available; therefore how best to respond to challenges during the outbreak is unknown. The observations of mental health consequences and measures taken during the 2003 SARS outbreak could help inform health authorities and the public to provide mental health interventions to those who are in need. Patients with confirmed or suspected 2019-nCoV may experience fear of the consequences of infection with a potentially fatal new virus, and those in quarantine might experience boredom, loneliness, and anger. Furthermore, symptoms of the infection, such as fever, hypoxia, and cough, as well as adverse effects of treatment, such as insomnia caused by corticosteroids, could lead to worsening anxiety and mental distress. 2019-nCoV has been repeatedly described as a killer virus, for example on WeChat, which has perpetuated the sense of danger and uncertainty among health workers and the public. In the early phase of the SARS outbreak, a range of psychiatric morbidities, including persistent depression, anxiety, panic attacks, psychomotor excitement, psychotic symptoms, delirium, and even suicidality, were reported.6, 7 Mandatory contact tracing and 14 days quarantine, which form part of the public health responses to the 2019-nCoV pneumonia outbreak, could increase patients' anxiety and guilt about the effects of contagion, quarantine, and stigma on their families and friends. Health professionals, especially those working in hospitals caring for people with confirmed or suspected 2019-nCoV pneumonia, are vulnerable to both high risk of infection and mental health problems. They may also experience fear of contagion and spreading the virus to their families, friends, or colleagues. Health workers in a Beijing hospital who were quarantined, worked in high-risk clinical settings such as SARS units, or had family or friends who were infected with SARS, had substantially more post-traumatic stress symptoms than those without these experiences. 8 Health professionals who worked in SARS units and hospitals during the SARS outbreak also reported depression, anxiety, fear, and frustration.6, 9 Despite the common mental health problems and disorders found among patients and health workers in such settings, most health professionals working in isolation units and hospitals do not receive any training in providing mental health care. Timely mental health care needs to be developed urgently. Some methods used in the SARS outbreak could be helpful for the response to the 2019-nCoV outbreak. First, multidisciplinary mental health teams established by health authorities at regional and national levels (including psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, clinical psychologists, and other mental health workers) should deliver mental health support to patients and health workers. Specialised psychiatric treatments and appropriate mental health services and facilities should be provided for patients with comorbid mental disorders. Second, clear communication with regular and accurate updates about the 2019-nCoV outbreak should be provided to both health workers and patients in order to address their sense of uncertainty and fear. Treatment plans, progress reports, and health status updates should be given to both patients and their families. Third, secure services should be set up to provide psychological counselling using electronic devices and applications (such as smartphones and WeChat) for affected patients, as well as their families and members of the public. Using safe communication channels between patients and families, such as smartphone communication and WeChat, should be encouraged to decrease isolation. Fourth, suspected and diagnosed patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia as well as health professionals working in hospitals caring for infected patients should receive regular clinical screening for depression, anxiety, and suicidality by mental health workers. Timely psychiatric treatments should be provided for those presenting with more severe mental health problems. For most patients and health workers, emotional and behavioural responses are part of an adaptive response to extraordinary stress, and psychotherapy techniques such as those based on the stress-adaptation model might be helpful.7, 10 If psychotropic medications are used, such as those prescribed by psychiatrists for severe psychiatric comorbidities, 6 basic pharmacological treatment principles of ensuring minimum harm should be followed to reduce harmful effects of any interactions with 2019-nCoV and its treatments. In any biological disaster, themes of fear, uncertainty, and stigmatisation are common and may act as barriers to appropriate medical and mental health interventions. Based on experience from past serious novel pneumonia outbreaks globally and the psychosocial impact of viral epidemics, the development and implementation of mental health assessment, support, treatment, and services are crucial and pressing goals for the health response to the 2019-nCoV outbreak. © 2020 VW Pics/Science Photo Library 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              The impact of epidemic outbreak: the case of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and suicide among older adults in Hong Kong.

              Previous studies revealed that there was a significant increase in suicide deaths among those aged 65 and over in 2003. The peak coincided with the majority of SARS cases being reported in April 2003.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lindsey.monteith@va.gov
                Journal
                J Rural Health
                J Rural Health
                10.1111/(ISSN)1748-0361
                JRH
                The Journal of Rural Health
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0890-765X
                1748-0361
                30 May 2020
                : 10.1111/jrh.12448
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Veterans Affairs Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention Aurora Colorado
                [ 2 ] Department of Psychiatry University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado
                [ 3 ] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado
                [ 4 ] Department of Neurology University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado
                [ 5 ] Department of Psychiatry Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]For further information, contact: Lindsey L. Monteith, PhD, Department of Veterans Affairs, Rocky Mountain MIRECC, 1700 North Wheeling, Aurora, CO 80045; e‐mail lindsey.monteith@ 123456va.gov .

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-5280
                Article
                JRH12448
                10.1111/jrh.12448
                7262063
                32282968
                1914e7de-46fd-4f96-bb97-4e59a0ed8c49
                © 2020 National Rural Health Association

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Pages: 6, Words: 3384
                Categories
                Commentary
                Commentary
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.3 mode:remove_FC converted:01.06.2020

                covid‐19,mental health,psychology,social determinants of health,utilization of health services

                Comments

                Comment on this article