21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review on the role of biosecurity to prevent or control colibacillosis in broiler production

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This systematic review aimed at investigating the role that biosecurity can have in preventing or controlling colibacillosis in broiler production. Primary studies with natural or experimental exposure to avian pathogenic Escherichia coli, evaluating any biosecurity measure to prevent or control colibacillosis in broiler chickens with at least one of the following outcomes: feed conversion ratio ( FCR), condemnations at slaughter, and mortality due to colibacillosis, were included. A systematic search was carried out in 4 databases according to the Cochrane handbook and reported following the PRISMA 2020 directions. Studies (n = 3,886) were screened in a 2-phase process and data matching the inclusion criteria were extracted. Risk of bias assessment was performed. Four studies reporting biosecurity measures to prevent or control colibacillosis in broiler production were included. In all studies, only disinfection during either the pre-hatching period (n = 3) or the post-hatching period (n = 1) was evaluated as biosecurity measure in broiler production, as well as its effect on FCR (n = 2) and mortality (n = 4) due to colibacillosis. No studies with effects on condemnations at slaughter were found. Due to the heterogeneity of studies in regard to interventions and outcomes, meta-analysis was not carried out. The limited findings of this systematic review do not provide a comprehensive evidence to statistically evaluate the efficacy of biosecurity to prevent or control colibacillosis in broiler production. The scarcity of evidence found suggests that further and deeper investigations on the topic are needed, considering the variety of interventions related to biosecurity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Avian Colibacillosis and Salmonellosis: A Closer Look at Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Control and Public Health Concerns

            Avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis are considered to be the major bacterial diseases in the poultry industry world-wide. Colibacillosis and salmonellosis are the most common avian diseases that are communicable to humans. This article provides the vital information on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, control and public health concerns of avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis. A better understanding of the information addressed in this review article will assist the poultry researchers and the poultry industry in continuing to make progress in reducing and eliminating avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis from the poultry flocks, thereby reducing potential hazards to the public health posed by these bacterial diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Avian colibacillosis: still many black holes.

              Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) strains cause severe respiratory and systemic diseases, threatening food security and avian welfare worldwide. Intensification of poultry production and the quick expansion of free-range production systems will increase the incidence of colibacillosis through greater exposure of birds to pathogens and stress. Therapy is mainly based on antibiotherapy and current vaccines have poor efficacy. Serotyping remains the most frequently used diagnostic method, only allowing the identification of a limited number of APEC strains. Several studies have demonstrated that the most common virulence factors studied in APEC are all rarely present in the same isolate, showing that APEC strains constitute a heterogeneous group. Different isolates may harbor different associations of virulence factors, each one able to induce colibacillosis. Despite its economical relevance, pathogenesis of colibacillosis is poorly understood. Our knowledge on the host response to APEC is based on very descriptive studies, mostly restricted to bacteriological and histopathological analysis of infected organs such as lungs. Furthermore, only a small number of APEC isolates have been used in experimental studies. In the present review, we discuss current knowledge on APEC diversity and virulence, including host response to infection and the associated inflammatory response with a focus on pulmonary colibacillosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Poult Sci
                Poult Sci
                Poultry Science
                Elsevier
                0032-5791
                1525-3171
                06 June 2024
                August 2024
                06 June 2024
                : 103
                : 8
                : 103955
                Affiliations
                [* ]Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Legnaro, Italy
                []Department of Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Ngaoundéré, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon
                []Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
                [§ ]Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Merelbeke, Belgium
                [# ]Dairy Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization “DIMITRA”, Ioannina, Greece
                [|| ]Clinic for Poultry and Fish Medicine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary, Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                []Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary, Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
                Author notes
                [2 ]Corresponding author: alessandra.piccirillo@ 123456unipd.it
                [1]

                These authors contributed equally.

                Article
                S0032-5791(24)00534-0 103955
                10.1016/j.psj.2024.103955
                11255943
                38917608
                1935118a-47f6-4f00-959c-3006125cee0f
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 December 2023
                : 3 June 2024
                Categories
                MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION

                biosecurity,broiler,colibacillosis,control,prevention
                biosecurity, broiler, colibacillosis, control, prevention

                Comments

                Comment on this article