3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Korean primary health care program for people with disabilities: do they really want home-based primary care?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite many studies on home-based primary care (HBPC)-related benefits and challenges, little is known about the perspectives of potential target groups of the care and their intention or preference for using it. This study aimed to explore the demand for HBPC from the perspective of people with disabilities (PWDs) and caregivers and identify relevant determinants for that demand.

          Methods

          Data from the population-based survey conducted in the Gyeonggi Regional Health & Medical Center for People with Disabilities in South Korea were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify relevant determinants for the demand on HBPC.

          Results

          Overall, 22% of respondents required HBPC, and 34.7% of persons aged ≥ 65 years demanded it. Older adults with disability, homebound status, and a need for assistance with daily living activities were associated with a demand for HBPC. Though having severe disability, only 19.49% of self-reported respondents demanded for HBPC, while 39.57% of proxy-reported respondents demanded for HBPC. Among self-reported group, only marital status was a predictor associated with a demand for HBPC. In contrast, among proxy-reported groups, PWDs with external physical disabilities, or with unmet medical needs due to availability barriers reported a higher demand for HBPC.

          Conclusions

          The demand for HBPC does not derive from the medical demands of the users themselves, but rather the care deficit by difficulty in getting out of the house or in outpatient care. Beyond an alternative to office-based care, HBPC needs to be considered to solve the care deficit and as well as to deal with PWDs’ medical problems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic review of outcomes from home-based primary care programs for homebound older adults.

          To describe the effect of home-based primary care for homebound older adults on individual, caregiver, and systems outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Better access, quality, and cost for clinically complex veterans with home-based primary care.

            In successfully reducing healthcare expenditures, patient goals must be met and savings differentiated from cost shifting. Although the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) program for chronically ill individuals has resulted in cost reduction for the VA, it is unknown whether cost reduction results from restricting services or shifting costs to Medicare and whether HBPC meets patient goals. Cost projection using a hierarchical condition category (HCC) model adapted to the VA was used to determine VA plus Medicare projected costs for 9,425 newly enrolled HBPC recipients. Projected annual costs were compared with observed annualized costs before and during HBPC. To assess patient perspectives of care, 31 veterans and caregivers were interviewed from three representative programs. During HBPC, Medicare costs were 10.8% lower than projected, VA plus Medicare costs were 11.7% lower than projected, and combined hospitalizations were 25.5% lower than during the period without HBPC. Patients reported high satisfaction with HBPC team access, education, and continuity of care, which they felt contributed to fewer exacerbations, emergency visits, and hospitalizations. HBPC improves access while reducing hospitalizations and total cost. Medicare is currently testing the HBPC approach through the Independence at Home demonstration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effectiveness of team-managed home-based primary care: a randomized multicenter trial.

              Although home-based health care has grown over the past decade, its effectiveness remains controversial. A prior trial of Veterans Affairs (VA) Team-Managed Home-Based Primary Care (TM/HBPC) found favorable outcomes, but the replicability of the model and generalizability of the findings are unknown. To assess the impact of TM/HBPC on functional status, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), satisfaction with care, and cost of care. Multisite randomized controlled trial conducted from October 1994 to September 1998 in 16 VA medical centers with HBPC programs. A total of 1966 patients with a mean age of 70 years who had 2 or more activities of daily living impairments or a terminal illness, congestive heart failure (CHF), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Intervention Home-based primary care (n=981), including a primary care manager, 24-hour contact for patients, prior approval of hospital readmissions, and HBPC team participation in discharge planning, vs customary VA and private sector care (n=985). Patient functional status, patient and caregiver HR-QoL and satisfaction, caregiver burden, hospital readmissions, and costs over 12 months. Functional status as assessed by the Barthel Index did not differ for terminal (P=.40) or nonterminal (those with severe disability or who had CHF or COPD) (P=.17) patients by treatment group. Significant improvements were seen in terminal TM/HBPC patients in HR-QoL scales of emotional role function, social function, bodily pain, mental health, vitality, and general health. Team-Managed HBPC nonterminal patients had significant increases of 5 to 10 points in 5 of 6 satisfaction with care scales. The caregivers of terminal patients in the TM/HBPC group improved significantly in HR-QoL measures except for vitality and general health. Caregivers of nonterminal patients improved significantly in QoL measures and reported reduced caregiver burden (P=.008). Team-Managed HBPC patients with severe disability experienced a 22% relative decrease (0.7 readmissions/patient for TM/HBPC group vs 0.9 readmissions/patient for control group) in hospital readmissions (P=.03) at 6 months that was not sustained at 12 months. Total mean per person costs were 6.8% higher in the TM/HBPC group at 6 months ($19190 vs $17971) and 12.1% higher at 12 months ($31401 vs $28008). The TM/HBPC intervention improved most HR-QoL measures among terminally ill patients and satisfaction among non-terminally ill patients. It improved caregiver HR-QoL, satisfaction with care, and caregiver burden and reduced hospital readmissions at 6 months, but it did not substitute for other forms of care. The higher costs of TM/HBPC should be weighed against these benefits.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sjang@cau.ac.kr
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                11 October 2023
                11 October 2023
                2023
                : 23
                : 1086
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, ( https://ror.org/01r024a98) 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06974 South Korea
                [2 ]Department of Gyeonggi Regional Health & Medical Center for Persons with Disabilities, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, ( https://ror.org/00cb3km46) Seongnam, Gyeonggi Korea
                [3 ]GRID grid.412480.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0647 3378, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, , Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, ; Seongnam, Gyeonggi Korea
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-8713
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-0344
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-945X
                Article
                10102
                10.1186/s12913-023-10102-9
                10568830
                37821901
                19749c3a-5a6f-424e-b710-70ae6a5b3645
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 20 May 2023
                : 2 October 2023
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Health & Social care
                home-based primary care,disabilities,healthcare access,health services for people with disabilities,service demand

                Comments

                Comment on this article