4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The effects of acute and preventive migraine therapies in a mouse model of chronic migraine

      , , , ,
      Cephalalgia
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9357170e147">Background</h5> <p id="P1">The development of novel migraine therapies has been slow, in part because of the small number of clinically relevant animal models. We have recently developed a new mouse model of chronic migraine using chronic intermittent nitroglycerin, a known human migraine trigger. The objective of this study was to validate this model by testing known and potential migraine-preventive treatments. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9357170e152">Methods</h5> <p id="P2">Migraine therapies were administered to male and female mice for 11 days. On day 3, mice were tested with nitroglycerin every second day for nine days. Basal and nitroglycerin-evoked mechanical hypersensitivity was evaluated using von Frey filaments. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9357170e157">Results</h5> <p id="P3">Chronic intermittent nitroglycerin produced acute hyperalgesia with each administration, and progressive and sustained basal hypersensitivity. The established preventive migraine therapy propranolol effectively blocked the development of acute and chronic nitroglycerin-induced hyperalgesia, while valproate had no effect. Potential migraine-preventive therapies were also tested: Amiloride inhibited nitroglycerin-induced acute and chronic hyperalgesia; while memantine was ineffective. We also tested the acute migraine therapy sumatriptan, which did not alter nitroglycerin-induced hyperalgesia, but instead resulted in acute and chronic hyperalgesia similar to that observed following nitroglycerin administration. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9357170e162">Conclusions</h5> <p id="P4">This study establishes the chronic nitroglycerin model as an additional screening tool to test novel migraine-preventive therapies. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide.

          This study, which is a part of the initiative 'Lifting The Burden: The Global Campaign to Reduce the Burden of Headache Worldwide', assesses and presents all existing evidence of the world prevalence and burden of headache disorders. Population-based studies applying International Headache Society criteria for migraine and tension-type headache, and also studies on headache in general and 'chronic daily headache', have been included. Globally, the percentages of the adult population with an active headache disorder are 46% for headache in general, 11% for migraine, 42% for tension-type headache and 3% for chronic daily headache. Our calculations indicate that the disability attributable to tension-type headache is larger worldwide than that due to migraine. On the World Health Organization's ranking of causes of disability, this would bring headache disorders into the 10 most disabling conditions for the two genders, and into the five most disabling for women.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chronic migraine in the population: burden, diagnosis, and satisfaction with treatment.

            To evaluate the disability profile and patterns of treatment and health care use for chronic migraine (CM) in the general population, in contrast to episodic migraine. We identified 24,000 headache sufferers, drawn from more than 165,000 individuals representative of the US population. This sample has been followed up with annual surveys using validated questionnaires for the diagnosis of episodic migraine and CM. As a part of the survey, subjects were asked to report the specific medications currently used for their most severe headaches, as well as level of satisfaction with treatment. Our sample consisted of 520 individuals with CM and 9,424 with episodic migraine. Over a 3-month period, more than half of the individuals with CM missed at least 5 days of household work, compared with 24.3% of those with episodic migraine (p < 0.001). Reduced productivity in household work for at least 5 days over 3 months was reported by 58.1% and 18.2% (p < 0.001); at least 5 days of missed family activities was reported by 36.9% and 9.5% (p < 0.001). The majority of the CM sufferers (87.6%) had previously sought care to discuss their headaches with a health professional. Migraine-specific acute treatments were used by 31.6% of respondents with CM and 24.8% with episodic migraine. Around 48% of the individuals with CM were satisfied with their acute therapies. Just 33.3% of those with CM were currently using preventive medications. Chronic migraine (CM) is more disabling than episodic migraine in the population. Although most individuals with CM sought medical care for this disorder, the majority did not receive specific acute or preventive medications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cortical spreading depression and migraine.

              Cortical spreading depression (CSD), a slowly propagated wave of depolarization followed by suppression of brain activity, is a remarkably complex event that involves dramatic changes in neural and vascular function. Since its original description in the 1940s, CSD has been hypothesized to be the underlying mechanism of the migraine aura. Substantial evidence from animal models provides indirect support for this hypothesis, and studies showing that CSD is common in humans with brain injury clearly demonstrate that the phenomenon can occur in the human brain. Considerable uncertainty about the role of CSD in migraine remains, however, and key questions about how this event is initiated, how it spreads, and how it might cause migraine symptoms remain unanswered. This Review summarizes current concepts of CSD and its potential roles in migraine, and addresses ongoing studies aimed at a clearer understanding of this fundamental brain phenomenon.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cephalalgia
                Cephalalgia
                SAGE Publications
                0333-1024
                1468-2982
                July 11 2016
                July 19 2016
                : 36
                : 11
                : 1048-1056
                Article
                10.1177/0333102415623070
                5557701
                26682574
                1994ab08-7054-4a2b-a905-f585392d3077
                © 2016

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article