This study sought to assess the clinical utility of interpreting emergency echocardiograms
after regular working hours through a telemedicine connection to on-call cardiologists.
Physician interpretation of emergency echocardiograms is often delayed during weekends,
evenings or night hours. This delay places undue responsibility on less qualified
personnel to interpret echocardiograms of vital importance.
Digital quad-screen cine-loop format was transmitted over standard telephone lines.
Clinical data and conventional and telemedicine interpretations were collected prospectively
for 187 emergent or semiemergent tele-echocardiograms after regular working hours.
Indications for the echocardiogram included assessment of left ventricular function,
ischemia, pericardial effusion, valvular disease, heart donor status and arrhythmia.
Three off-site echocardiographers received the standard echocardiogram and spectral,
gray-scale and color flow Doppler images in cineloop format using a laptop computer.
Laptop interpretation showed 19 technically limited studied, 153 abnormal studies
and 54% with wall motion abnormalities. Overall mean agreement rate between telemedicine
laptop interpretation and conventional workstation interpretation performed in blinded
manner for serious disorders with classic echocardiographic findings (pulmonary hypertension,
left ventricular thrombus, aortic dissection, severe valvular insufficiency and large
pericardial effusion) was 99.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96% to 99%). For serious
wall motion abnormalities, the agreement rate was 96.3% (95% CI 92% to 99%). The following
mean times elapsed after completion of the echocardiogram: to laptop fax report, 2.14
(range 10 min to 8 h); to dictation of videotape, 11.74 h (p < 0.001); to transcription
of videotape diction, 56.6 h (p < 0.0001).
After-hours emergency echocardiography telemedicine using a laptop computer is more
rapid than scheduled conventional interpretation from a videotape workstation, yet
diagnostic accuracy is comparable.