2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intensive Hemodiafiltration Successfully Removes Ganciclovir Overdose and Largely Exceeds Reported Elimination During Hemodialysis—A Case Report and Review of the Literature

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We present the case of a kidney transplant patient (Cockroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance 14 ml/min) who was inadvertently eight-fold overdosed with a single dose of 500 mg intravenous ganciclovir. To prevent the immunosuppressed patient from being exposed to severe risks of prolonged ganciclovir overdosing, including potentially fatal bone marrow suppression and severe neurotoxicity, the patient was treated with hemodiafiltration (HDF) to enhance drug elimination. Since the product label reports a 50% decrease of ganciclovir plasma concentrations after intermittent hemodialysis (HD), two HDF sessions were considered necessary to achieve a ≥75% elimination of the drug by precaution, despite targeted intense HDF prescription. Ganciclovir plasma concentration data were obtained during both HDF sessions and were analyzed retrospectively. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that prescribed HDF successfully decreased drug plasma concentrations by ≥90%. This ganciclovir reduction ratio matched the urea reduction ratio achieved (≥92%). Model-based assessment of ganciclovir dialysis clearance (estimated to be 445 ml/min), accounting for its two-compartmental kinetics, was higher than urea dialysis clearance (estimated to be 310 ml/min). This suggests potential relevant accumulation of ganciclovir into blood cells, at least in this patient after overdosing. The amount (fraction) of drug removed by 1 st HDF was estimated to 269 mg (93% of total amount of 288 mg eliminated during the 1 st HDF session; estimated amount in the body prior to 1 st HDF: 380 mg). A literature review was performed to summarize and systematically compare available information on ganciclovir elimination during intermittent renal replacement therapy. In conclusion, the high ganciclovir HDF clearance measured in our patient largely exceeded previously reported elimination during HD, meaning that HDF prescription was highly efficient in the present case, and that a second HDF session might not have been necessary. This finding may be considered to guide renal replacement therapy in the scope of drug overdosing. It may also be evaluated for ganciclovir dose adjustment in patients on chronic HD or HDF with high small solute clearance, since a strong correlation between ganciclovir and urea elimination efficiency was observed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir and ganciclovir in renal impairment.

          Valganciclovir is the oral prodrug of ganciclovir. The pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir in patients with renal impairment is not known. Furthermore, it is not known whether there are any pharmacokinetic differences between patients who are positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) and healthy subjects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Population pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir after intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir administration in solid organ transplant patients infected with cytomegalovirus.

            A population pharmacokinetics analysis was performed after intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir in solid organ transplant patients with cytomegalovirus. Patients received ganciclovir at 5 mg/kg of body weight (5 days) and then 900 mg of valganciclovir (16 days), both twice daily with dose adjustment for renal function. A total of 382 serum concentrations from days 5 and 15 were analyzed with NONMEM VI. Renal function given by creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) was the most influential covariate in CL. The final pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: ganciclovir clearance (CL) was 7.49.(CL(CR)/57) liter/h (57 was the mean population value of CL(CR)); the central and peripheral distribution volumes were 31.9 liters and 32.0 liters, respectively; intercompartmental clearance was 10.2 liter/h; the first-order absorption rate constant was 0.895 h(-1); bioavailability was 0.825; and lag time was 0.382 h. The CL(CR) was the best predictor of CL, making dose adjustment by this covariate important to achieve the most efficacious ganciclovir exposure.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Guidelines for Reporting Case Studies on Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisonings: Methodology

              A literature review performed by the EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup highlighted deficiencies in the existing literature, especially the reporting of case studies. Although general reporting guidelines exist for case studies, there are none in the specific field of extracorporeal treatments in toxicology. Our goal was to construct and propose a checklist that systematically outlines the minimum essential items to be reported in a case study of poisoned patients undergoing extracorporeal treatments. Through a modified two-round Delphi technique, panelists (mostly chosen from the EXTRIP workgroup) were asked to vote on the pertinence of a set of items to identify those considered minimally essential for reporting complete and accurate case reports. Furthermore, independent raters validated the clarity of each selected items between each round of voting. All case reports containing data on extracorporeal treatments in poisoning published in Medline in 2011 were reviewed during the external validation rounds. Twenty-one panelists (20 from the EXTRIP workgroup and an invited expert on pharmacology reporting guidelines) participated in the modified Delphi technique. This group included journal editors and experts in nephrology, clinical toxicology, critical care medicine, emergency medicine, and clinical pharmacology. Three independent raters participated in the validation rounds. Panelists voted on a total of 144 items in the first round and 137 items in the second round, with response rates of 96.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Twenty case reports were evaluated at each validation round and the independent raters' response rate was 99.6% and 98.8% per validation round. The final checklist consists of 114 items considered essential for case study reporting. This methodology of alternate voting and external validation rounds was useful in developing the first reporting guideline for case studies in the field of extracorporeal treatments in poisoning. We believe that this guideline will improve the completeness and transparency of published case reports and that the systematic aggregation of information from case reports may provide early signals of effectiveness and/or harm, thereby improving healthcare decision-making.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                12 June 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 882
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University of Basel Children’s Hospital , Basel, Switzerland
                [2] 2Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Basel , Basel, Switzerland
                [3] 3National Poisons Information Centre, Tox Info Suisse, Associated Institute of the University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [4] 4Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Zürich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [5] 5Department of Internal Medicine, Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna , Lucerne, Switzerland
                [6] 6Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel , Basel, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Roberto Paganelli, University of Studies G. d’Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, Italy

                Reviewed by: Anders Åsberg, University of Oslo, Norway; Bernard J. M. Canaud, Université de Montpellier, France

                *Correspondence: Verena Gotta, verena.gotta@ 123456ukbb.ch

                This article was submitted to Translational Pharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                10.3389/fphar.2020.00882
                7303306
                19d1047a-0708-49ba-ba89-6c31da450767
                Copyright © 2020 Gotta, Leuppi-Taegtmeyer, Gessler, Pfister, Müller and Jehle

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 March 2020
                : 28 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 14, References: 29, Pages: 8, Words: 4656
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Case Report

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                ganciclovir,valganciclovir,hemodialysis,hemodiafiltration,overdose,toxicity,blood-to-plasma concentration ratio

                Comments

                Comment on this article