5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      African American Living Donors’ Attitudes About APOL1 Genetic Testing: A Mixed Methods Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale & Objective:

          African American (AA) live kidney donors (‘donors’) have a greater risk of kidney failure than do European American donors. Apolipoprotein L1 gene ( APOL1) variants in AAs may be associated with this disparity.

          Study Design:

          Cross-sectional, mixed-methods design.

          Setting & Participants:

          AA donors at one transplant center.

          Analytic Approach:

          Semi-structured interviews assessed attitudes about APOL1 genetic testing, willingness to undergo APOL1 testing, hypothetical decisions about donating with two APOL1 variants, and demographics. Surveys assessed perceptions of ethnic identity and genetics knowledge. Interview transcriptions were analyzed using thematic analysis. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

          Results:

          Twenty-three donors participated in semi-structured interviews. Most (96%) reported that transplant centers should routinely offer APOL1 genetic testing to all AA potential donors. Most (87%) would have been willing to undergo APOL1 testing before donating. Although study participants noted that APOL1 testing may deter AA potential donors from donating, most (61%) would have donated even if they had two high risk APOL1 variants. Several themes emerged. Study participants believed that APOL1 testing would have provided information helpful to donors’ ability to make informed donation decisions. Participants expressed concern about APOL1 variants placing donors at harm for kidney failure and, therefore, valued taking preventive health measures. Participants believed that potential donors would experience psychological distress from learning they have two gene variants and could harm their recipients. Participants were apprehensive about insurance coverage and costs of APOL1 testing and feared that APOL1 genetic test results could discriminate against AAs.

          Limitations:

          Findings may not be generalizable to AA potential donors.

          Conclusions:

          Findings suggest that AA donors support APOL1 genetic testing, yet fear that APOL1 variants and genetic testing could adversely affect donors’ health and ethnic identity. Transplant centers using APOL1 genetic testing should address AA donors’ concerns about APOL1 genetic testing to optimize future donors’ informed consent practices.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: Professor
          Role: Associate Professor
          Role: Associate Professor
          Role: Professor
          Journal
          8110075
          423
          Am J Kidney Dis
          Am. J. Kidney Dis.
          American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation
          0272-6386
          1523-6838
          24 August 2018
          22 October 2018
          December 2018
          01 December 2019
          : 72
          : 6
          : 819-833
          Affiliations
          Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Center for Healthcare Studies, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
          Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
          Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
          Center for Genetic Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
          Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
          Department of Biomedical Ethics and Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
          Author notes

          Authors’ Contributions: research idea and study design: EJG, JF, CW, RS; data acquisition: EJG, DA; data analysis/interpretation: EJG, DA, IB, RS, JF, CW; statistical analysis: EJG; supervision/mentorship: EJG. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting or revision and accepts accountability for the overall work by ensuring that questions pertaining to the accuracy or integrity of any portion of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

          Corresponding Author: Elisa J. Gordon, PhD, MPH, Professor, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Department of Medical Education, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair, 20 th FL, Chicago, IL 60611-5099, Tel: 312-503-5563, Fax: 312-503-4401, e-gordon@ 123456northwestern.edu
          Article
          PMC6252162 PMC6252162 6252162 nihpa1504910
          10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.017
          6252162
          30360961
          19e264c9-d7c1-489a-a9a6-d60f7beaffad
          History
          Categories
          Article

          kidney transplantation,sociocultural,living donation,African American,ethics,ethnicity,informed consent,health disparities,genetic testing,apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1),medical decision making,cultural identity,qualitative research

          Comments

          Comment on this article