11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Computational instantaneous wave‐free ratio (IFR) for patient‐specific coronary artery stenoses using 1D network models

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this work, we estimate the diagnostic threshold of the instantaneous wave‐free ratio (iFR) through the use of a one‐dimensional haemodynamic framework. To this end, we first compared the computed fractional flow reserve (cFFR) predicted from a 1D computational framework with invasive clinical measurements. The framework shows excellent promise and utilises minimal patient data from a cohort of 52 patients with a total of 66 stenoses. The diagnostic accuracy of the cFFR model was 75.76 %, with a sensitivity of 71.43 %, a specificity of 77.78 %, a positive predictive value of 60 %, and a negative predictive value of 85.37 %. The validated model was then used to estimate the diagnostic threshold of iFR. The model determined a quadratic relationship between cFFR and the ciFR. The iFR diagnostic threshold was determined to be 0.8910 from a receiver operating characteristic curve that is in the range of 0.89 to 0.9 that is normally reported in clinical studies.

          Abstract

          In this work we estimate the diagnostic threshold of iFR through the use of a one‐dimentional haemodynamic model. The 1D model is first validated through a comparison with invasive fractional flow reserve measurements, for which a diagnostic accuracy of 75.76% was achieved. The one‐dimentional model was then utilised to compare cFFR and ciFR on patient‐specific arterial geometries that were extracted via CCTA. The diagnostic threshold of iFR was determined to be 0.891 which is in the normal range reported from invasive clinical studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses.

          The clinical significance of coronary-artery stenoses of moderate severity can be difficult to determine. Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a new index of the functional severity of coronary stenoses that is calculated from pressure measurements made during coronary arteriography. We compared this index with the results of noninvasive tests commonly used to detect myocardial ischemia, to determine the usefulness of the index. In 45 consecutive patients with moderate coronary stenosis and chest pain of uncertain origin, we performed bicycle exercise testing, thallium scintigraphy, stress echocardiography with dobutamine, and quantitative coronary arteriography and compared the results with measurements of FFR. In all 21 patients with an FFR of less than 0.75, reversible myocardial ischemia was demonstrated unequivocally on at least one noninvasive test. After coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery was performed, all the positive test results reverted to normal. In contrast, 21 of the 24 patients with an FFR of 0.75 or higher tested negative for reversible myocardial ischemia on all the noninvasive tests. No revascularization procedures were performed in these patients, and none were required during 14 months of follow-up. The sensitivity of FFR in the identification of reversible ischemia was 88 percent, the specificity 100 percent, the positive predictive value 100 percent, the negative predictive value 88 percent, and the accuracy 93 percent. In patients with coronary stenosis of moderate severity, FFR appears to be a useful index of the functional severity of the stenoses and the need for coronary revascularization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI

            Coronary revascularization guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with better patient outcomes after the procedure than revascularization guided by angiography alone. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.

              The purpose of this study was to investigate the 2-year outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). In patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI, coronary angiography is the standard method for guiding stent placement. The FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study showed that routine FFR in addition to angiography improves outcomes of PCI at 1 year. It is unknown if these favorable results are maintained at 2 years of follow-up. At 20 U.S. and European medical centers, 1,005 patients with multivessel CAD were randomly assigned to PCI with drug-eluting stents guided by angiography alone or guided by FFR measurements. Before randomization, lesions requiring PCI were identified based on their angiographic appearance. Patients randomized to angiography-guided PCI underwent stenting of all indicated lesions, whereas those randomized to FFR-guided PCI underwent stenting of indicated lesions only if the FFR was 0.80, the rate of myocardial infarction was 0.2% and the rate of revascularization was 3.2 % after 2 years. Routine measurement of FFR in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents significantly reduces mortality and myocardial infarction at 2 years when compared with standard angiography-guided PCI. (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation [FAME]; NCT00267774). Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                p.nithiarasu@swansea.ac.uk
                Journal
                Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng
                Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng
                10.1002/(ISSN)2040-7947
                CNM
                International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2040-7939
                2040-7947
                23 December 2019
                November 2019
                : 35
                : 11 ( doiID: 10.1002/cnm.v35.11 )
                : e3255
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Zienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, College of Engineering Swansea University Swansea UK
                [ 2 ] Data Science Building, Swansea University Medical School Swansea University Swansea UK
                [ 3 ] Derriford Hospital and Peninsula Medical School Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust Plymouth UK
                [ 4 ] HDR UK Wales and Northern Ireland Health Data Research UK London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Perumal Nithiarasu, Zienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, Engineering Central, College of Engineering, Swansea University Bay Campus, Swansea, SA1 8EN, UK.

                Email: p.nithiarasu@ 123456swansea.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-9123
                Article
                CNM3255 cnm.3255
                10.1002/cnm.3255
                7003475
                31469943
                1a0a61fb-31cd-4794-b705-45dba88c0a18
                © 2019 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 04 April 2019
                : 22 July 2019
                : 21 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 15, Words: 5103
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000265;
                Award ID: MR/S004076/1
                Categories
                Research Article ‐ Fundamental
                Research Article ‐ Fundamentals
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:06.02.2020

                coronary arteries,ffr,haemodynamic modelling,ifr
                coronary arteries, ffr, haemodynamic modelling, ifr

                Comments

                Comment on this article