23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Field-friendly serological tests for determination of M. leprae-specific antibodies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Early detection of leprosy is key to reduce the ongoing transmission. Antibodies directed against M. leprae PGL-I represent a useful biomarker for detecting multibacillary (MB) patients. Since efficient leprosy diagnosis requires field-friendly test conditions, we evaluated two rapid lateral flow assays (LFA) for detection of Mycobacterium leprae-specific antibodies: the visual immunogold OnSite Leprosy Ab Rapid test [Gold-LFA] and the quantitative, luminescent up-converting phosphor anti-PGL-I test [UCP-LFA]. Test performance was assessed in independent cohorts originating from three endemic areas. In the Philippine cohort comprising patients with high bacillary indices (BI; average:4,9), 94%(n = 161) of MB patients were identified by UCP-LFA and 78%(n = 133) by Gold-LFA. In the Bangladeshi cohort, including mainly MB patients with low BI (average:1), 41%(n = 14) and 44%(n = 15) were detected by UCP-LFA and Gold-LFA, respectively. In the third cohort of schoolchildren from a leprosy hyperendemic region in Brazil, both tests detected 28%(n = 17) seropositivity. Both rapid tests corresponded well with BI(p < 0.0001), with a fairly higher sensitivity obtained with the UCP-LFA assay. However, due to the spectral character of leprosy, additional, cellular biomarkers are required to detect patients with low BIs. Therefore, the UCP-LFA platform, which allows multiplexing with differential biomarkers, offers more cutting-edge potential for diagnosis across the whole leprosy spectrum.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Classification of leprosy according to immunity. A five-group system.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effectiveness of single dose rifampicin in preventing leprosy in close contacts of patients with newly diagnosed leprosy: cluster randomised controlled trial.

            To determine the effectiveness of chemoprophylaxis using a single dose of rifampicin to prevent leprosy in close contacts. Single centre, double blind, cluster randomised, placebo controlled trial. Leprosy control programme in two districts of northwest Bangladesh with a population of more than four million. 28,092 close contacts of 1037 patients with newly diagnosed leprosy. 21,711 contacts fulfilled the study requirements. A single dose of rifampicin or placebo given to close contacts in the second month of starting the index patient's treatment, with follow-up for four years. Development of clinical leprosy. 18,869 of the 21,711 contacts (86.9%) were followed-up at four years. Ninety one of 9452 contacts in the placebo group and 59 of 9417 in the rifampicin group had developed leprosy. The overall reduction in incidence of leprosy using a single dose of rifampicin in the first two years was 57% (95% confidence interval 33% to 72%). The groups did not differ between two and four years. The overall number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent a single case of leprosy among contacts was 297 (95% confidence interval 176 to 537). Differences were found between subgroups at two years, both in reduction of incidence and in NNT. A single dose of rifampicin given to contacts of patients with newly diagnosed leprosy is effective at preventing the development of clinical leprosy at two years. The effect was maintained, but no difference was seen between the placebo and rifampicin groups beyond two years. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN61223447 [controlled-trials.com].
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Current knowledge on Mycobacterium leprae transmission: a systematic literature review.

              Summary
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                A.geluk@lumc.nl
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                21 August 2017
                21 August 2017
                2017
                : 7
                : 8868
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000089452978, GRID grid.10419.3d, Dept. of Infectious Diseases, , Leiden University Medical Center, ; Leiden, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000089452978, GRID grid.10419.3d, Dept. Molecular Cell Biology and Dept. Reumatology, , Leiden University Medical Center, ; Leiden, The Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8083, GRID grid.47894.36, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, , Colorado State University, ; Fort Collins, USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2171 5249, GRID grid.271300.7, Laboratório de Dermato-Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, , Universidade Federal do Pará, ; Marituba, Pará Brazil
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0004-0526
                Article
                7803
                10.1038/s41598-017-07803-7
                5566372
                28827673
                1a219603-bae7-4d37-9ced-0756f5d1e172
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 20 April 2017
                : 29 June 2017
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article