17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A protocol for an individualised, facilitated and sustainable approach to implementing current evidence in preventing falls in residential aged care facilities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Falls are common adverse events in residential care facilities. Commonly reported figures indicate that at least 50% of residents fall in a 12 month period, and that this figure is substantially higher for residents with dementia. This paper reports the protocol of a project which aims to implement evidence based falls prevention strategies in nine residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Australia. The facilities in the study include high and low care, small and large facilities, metropolitan and regional, facilities with a specific cultural focus, and target groups recognised as being more challenging to successful implementation of falls prevention practice (e.g. residents with dementia).

          Methods

          The project will be conducted from November 2007-November 2009. The project will involve baseline scoping of existing falls rates and falls prevention activities in each facility, an action research process, interactive falls prevention training, individual falls risk assessments, provision of equipment and modifications, organisation based steering committees, and an economic evaluation. In each RACF, staff will be invited to join an action research group that will lead the process of developing and implementing interventions designed to facilitate an evidence based approach to falls management in their facility. In all RACFs a pre/post design will be adopted with a range of standardised measures utilised to determine the impact of the interventions.

          Discussion

          The care gap in residential aged care that will be addressed through this project relates to the challenges in implementing best practice falls prevention actions despite the availability of best practice guidelines. There are numerous factors that may limit the uptake of best practice falls prevention guidelines in residential aged care facilities. A multi-factorial individualised (to the specific requirements of each facility) approach will be used to develop and implement an action plan in each participating facility based on the best available evidence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly people living in care homes--randomised controlled trial.

          to measure the impact of pharmacist-conducted clinical medication review with elderly care home residents. randomised controlled trial of clinical medication review by a pharmacist against usual care. sixty-five care homes for the elderly in Leeds, UK. a total of 661 residents aged 65+ years on one or more medicines. clinical medication review by a pharmacist with patient and clinical records. Recommendations to general practitioner for approval and implementation. Control patients received usual general practitioner care. primary: number of changes in medication per participant. Secondary: number and cost of repeat medicines per participant; medication review rate; mortality, falls, hospital admissions, general practitioner consultations, Barthel index, Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE). the pharmacist reviewed 315/331 (95.2%) patients in 6 months. A total of 62/330 (18.8%) control patients were reviewed by their general practitioner. The mean number of drug changes per patient were 3.1 for intervention and 2.4 for control group (P < 0.0001). There were respectively 0.8 and 1.3 falls per patient (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference for GP consultations per patient (means 2.9 and 2.8 in 6 months, P = 0.5), hospitalisations (means 0.2 and 0.3, P = 0.11), deaths (51/331 and 48/330, P = 0.81), Barthel score (9.8 and 9.3, P = 0.06), SMMSE score (13.9 and 13.8, P = 0.62), number and cost of drugs per patient (6.7 and 6.9, P = 0.5) (pounds sterling 42.24 and pounds sterling 42.94 per 28 days). A total of 75.6% (565/747) of pharmacist recommendations were accepted by the general practitioner; and 76.6% (433/565) of accepted recommendations were implemented. general practitioners do not review most care home patients' medication. A clinical pharmacist can review them and make recommendations that are usually accepted. This leads to substantial change in patients' medication regimens without change in drug costs. There is a reduction in the number of falls. There is no significant change in consultations, hospitalisation, mortality, SMMSE or Barthel scores.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Should older people in residential care receive vitamin D to prevent falls? Results of a randomized trial.

            To determine whether vitamin D supplementation can reduce the incidence of falls and fractures in older people in residential care who are not classically vitamin D deficient. Randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind, trial of 2 years' duration. Multicenter study in 60 hostels (assisted living facilities) and 89 nursing homes across Australia. Six hundred twenty-five residents (mean age 83.4) with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels between 25 and 90 nmol/L. Vitamin D supplementation (ergocalciferol, initially 10,000 IU given once weekly and then 1,000 IU daily) or placebo for 2 years. All subjects received 600 mg of elemental calcium daily as calcium carbonate. Falls and fractures recorded prospectively in study diaries by care staff. The vitamin D and placebo groups had similar baseline characteristics. In intention-to-treat analysis, the incident rate ratio for falling was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.57-0.95). The odds ratio for ever falling was 0.82 (95% CI=0.59-1.12) and for ever fracturing was 0.69 (95% CI=0.40-1.18). An a priori subgroup analysis of subjects who took at least half the prescribed capsules (n=540), demonstrated an incident rate ratio for falls of 0.63 (95% CI=0.48-0.82), an odds ratio (OR) for ever falling of 0.70 (95% CI=0.50-0.99), and an OR for ever fracturing of 0.68 (95% CI=0.38-1.22). Older people in residential care can reduce their incidence of falls if they take a vitamin D supplement for 2 years even if they are not initially classically vitamin D deficient.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fall and injury prevention in older people living in residential care facilities. A cluster randomized trial.

              Falls and resulting injuries are particularly common in older people living in residential care facilities, but knowledge about the prevention of falls is limited. To investigate whether a multifactorial intervention program would reduce falls and fall-related injuries. A cluster randomized, controlled, nonblinded trial. 9 residential care facilities located in a northern Swedish city. 439 residents 65 years of age or older. An 11-week multidisciplinary program that included both general and resident-specific, tailored strategies. The strategies comprised educating staff, modifying the environment, implementing exercise programs, supplying and repairing aids, reviewing drug regimens, providing free hip protectors, having post-fall problem-solving conferences, and guiding staff. The primary outcomes were the number of residents sustaining a fall, the number of falls, and the time to occurrence of the first fall. A secondary outcome was the number of injuries resulting from falls. During the 34-week follow-up period, 82 residents (44%) in the intervention program sustained a fall compared with 109 residents (56%) in the control group (risk ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96]). The adjusted odds ratio was 0.49 (CI, 0.37 to 0.65), and the adjusted incidence rate ratio of falls was 0.60 (CI, 0.50 to 0.73). Each of 3 residents in the intervention group and 12 in the control group had 1 femoral fracture (adjusted odds ratio, 0.23 [CI, 0.06 to 0.94]). Clustering was considered in all regression models. An interdisciplinary and multifactorial prevention program targeting residents, staff, and the environment may reduce falls and femoral fractures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatrics
                BioMed Central
                1471-2318
                2010
                17 February 2010
                : 10
                : 8
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Preventive and Public Health Division, National Ageing Research Institute, 34-54 Poplar Rd, Parkville, 3052, Australia
                [2 ]Allied Health Clinical Research Unit, Southern Health, Kingston Centre, Kingston Rd, Cheltenham, 3192, Australia
                [3 ]Physiotherapy Department, Monash University, McMahons Rd, Frankston, 3199, Australia
                [4 ]Physiotherapy Department, University of Queensland, Therapies Lane, St Lucia, 4072, Australia
                [5 ]Musculoskeletal Research Centre, LaTrobe University/Northern Health, Bundoora, 3086, Australia
                [6 ]School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Queensberry Street, Carlton 3010, Australia
                [7 ]Division of Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Sir Fred Schonell Drive, Brisbane, 4072, Australia
                [8 ]School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 121, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
                Article
                1471-2318-10-8
                10.1186/1471-2318-10-8
                2837007
                20163729
                1a8ace70-9d4a-4c7b-b601-918e85fae4cb
                Copyright ©2010 Haralambous et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 January 2010
                : 17 February 2010
                Categories
                Study protocol

                Geriatric medicine
                Geriatric medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article