116
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    16
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of alginate chemical disinfection on bacterial count over gypsum cast

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          To evaluate the efficacy of sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) and iodophor disinfectants on alginate impressions along with their effect on the survived bacterium count on the gypsum cast.

          MATERIALS AND METHODS

          Four alginate impression on each dentate patients were made, of which Group I were not washed or disinfected, Group II impressions were merely washed with water, Group III were disinfected by spraying with sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10), Group IV were disinfected with iodophor (1 : 213). Gypsum cast (type III) were made from all the impression. Impressions and gypsum cast were swabbed in mid palatal region for bacterial culture. Bacterial colony counting done after 3 days of incubation at 37℃ in blood agar media. The data obtained was analyzed by one way ANOVA test at a significant difference level of 0.05.

          RESULTS

          Group I and Group II showed significantly more bacteria compared to Group III and Group IV. Bacterial colonies on the alginate impression and gypsum cast in group disinfected with Sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) were 0.18, 0.82 respectively compared to group treated with iodophor (1 : 213). There was an increase in bacterial count on dental cast compared to source alginate impressions.

          CONCLUSION

          Sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) was found to be better disinfectant for alginate impression. There was an indication of increase in number of bacteria from alginate impression to making of dental cast. Additional gypsum cast disinfectant procedures need to be encouraged to completely eliminate cross infection to dental laboratory.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Infection control recommendations for the dental office and the dental laboratory. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and ADA Council on Dental Practice.

          (1996)
          This report is based on the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other publications in the medical and dental literature. The recommendations here, which have been accepted by the ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and the ADA Council on Dental Practice, are intended to offer general guidance for dental offices and laboratories on infection control. They are not intended to establish a standard of care or industry custom, nor are they intended to deprive the dentist of the ability to exercise his or her professional judgment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Disinfection procedures: their effect on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and gypsum casts.

            This study primarily investigated the effect of disinfection procedures (Perform and sodium hypochlorite) on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of four irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and the resultant gypsum casts. The antibacterial efficacy of the procedures was also studied. Dimensional accuracy was determined from the mean percentage deviation of six measurements taken from casts made from disinfected impressions compared with corresponding measurements from the master model and controls. Statistical analysis of data was determined by analysis of variance. Surface quality was determined using a stainless steel test block in accordance with ISO 1563. The dimensional accuracy of the impression materials tested were of a comparable standard following disinfection. The surface quality of casts taken from Blueprint Cremix impressions were unaffected by the disinfection procedures. The remaining impression materials studied showed greater surface deterioration on casts following disinfection with sodium hypochlorite than immersion in Perform. All disinfection procedures selected proved appropriate for antibacterial purposes. Individual analysis of impression materials is required to determine their suitability to a given disinfection protocol.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Carriage of oral flora on irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials.

              This study assessed the carriage and persistence of oral flora on irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. In the first part of the study, a single isolate each of Streptococcus mutans, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans were inoculated onto each of two elastomeric and two irreversible hydrocolloid impression surfaces artificially created in vitro. Then the inoculum was discarded, samples of impression material (13 mm in diameter) were removed over a 5-hour period, and the remainder of viable organisms were estimated. In the second part of the study, impressions were made from 21 dentate and eight edentulous patients, and bacterial counts were estimated as described. The results showed twofold to fivefold retention of bacteria on the irreversible hydrocolloids compared with the elastomeric impression surfaces. With all impression materials, the number of viable bacteria retained within 5 hours decreased 65% to 98% except for the "disinfectant" irreversible hydrocolloid Blueprint Asept, which totally destroyed the organisms in less than 3 minutes. It is concluded that the total bacterial "load" on impression surfaces is relatively low and decreases rapidly after impression making. However, disinfection of impression surfaces should be mandatory to prevent cross-infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Adv Prosthodont
                J Adv Prosthodont
                JAP
                The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
                The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
                2005-7806
                2005-7814
                May 2012
                30 May 2012
                : 4
                : 2
                : 84-88
                Affiliations
                Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Satheesh B. Haralur. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Tel. 966 555835386: hb_satheesh@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.84
                3381207
                22737312
                1a93e9b4-bdc7-4d66-a0f3-247b1a206d99
                © 2012 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 December 2011
                : 19 January 2012
                : 21 February 2012
                Categories
                Original Article

                Dentistry
                sodium hypochlorite,iodophor,dental impression,infection control,aerobic and anaerobic bacteria,dental laboratory

                Comments

                Comment on this article