101
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) produced its first guidelines in 2005 and renewed them in 2011. Recently published high-quality clinical trials on the effect of conservative treatment approaches (braces and exercises) for idiopathic scoliosis prompted us to update the last guidelines’ version. The objective was to align the guidelines with the new scientific evidence to assure faster knowledge transfer into clinical practice of conservative treatment for idiopathic scoliosis (CTIS).

          Methods

          Physicians, researchers and allied health practitioners working in the area of CTIS were involved in the development of the 2016 guidelines. Multiple literature reviews reviewing the evidence on CTIS (assessment, bracing, physiotherapy, physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE) and other CTIS) were conducted. Documents, recommendations and practical approach flow charts were developed using a Delphi procedure. The process was completed with the Consensus Session held during the first combined SOSORT/IRSSD Meeting held in Banff, Canada, in May 2016.

          Results

          The contents of the new 2016 guidelines include the following: background on idiopathic scoliosis, description of CTIS approaches for various populations with flow-charts for clinical practice, as well as literature reviews and recommendations on assessment, bracing, PSSE and other CTIS. The present guidelines include a total of 68 recommendations divided into following topics: bracing ( n = 25), PSSE to prevent scoliosis progression during growth ( n = 12), PSSE during brace treatment and surgical therapy ( n = 6), other conservative treatments ( n = 2), respiratory function and exercises ( n = 3), general sport activities ( n = 6); and assessment ( n = 14). According to the agreed strength and level of evidence rating scale, there were 2 recommendations on bracing and 1 recommendation on PSSE that reached level of recommendation “I” and level of evidence “II”. Three recommendations reached strength of recommendation A based on the level of evidence I (2 for bracing and one for assessment); 39 recommendations reached strength of recommendation B (20 for bracing, 13 for PSSE, and 6 for assessment).The number of paper for each level of evidence for each treatment is shown in Table  8.

          Conclusion

          The 2016 SOSORT guidelines were developed based on the current evidence on CTIS. Over the last 5 years, high-quality evidence has started to emerge, particularly in the areas of efficacy of bracing (one large multicentre trial) and PSSE (three single-centre randomized controlled trials). Several grade A recommendations were presented. Despite the growing high-quality evidence, the heterogeneity of the study protocols limits generalizability of the recommendations. There is a need for standardization of research methods of conservative treatment effectiveness, as recognized by SOSORT and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) non-operative management Committee.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references530

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations.

          The PedsQL (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory) (Children's Hospital and Health Center, San Diego, California) is a modular instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents ages 2 to 18. The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales are multidimensional child self-report and parent proxy-report scales developed as the generic core measure to be integrated with the PedsQL Disease-Specific Modules. The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales consist of 23 items applicable for healthy school and community populations, as well as pediatric populations with acute and chronic health conditions. The 4 PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales (Physical, Emotional, Social, School) were administered to 963 children and 1,629 parents (1,677 subjects accrued overall) recruited from pediatric health care settings. Item-level and scale-level measurement properties were computed. Internal consistency reliability for the Total Scale Score (alpha = 0.88 child, 0.90 parent report), Physical Health Summary Score (alpha = 0.80 child, 0.88 parent), and Psychosocial Health Summary Score (alpha = 0.83 child, 0.86 parent) were acceptable for group comparisons. Validity was demonstrated using the known-groups method, correlations with indicators of morbidity and illness burden, and factor analysis. The PedsQL distinguished between healthy children and pediatric patients with acute or chronic health conditions, was related to indicators of morbidity and illness burden, and displayed a factor-derived solution largely consistent with the a priori conceptually-derived scales. The results demonstrate the reliability and validity of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales may be applicable in clinical trials, research, clinical practice, school health settings, and community populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

            Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects 1-3% of children in the at-risk population of those aged 10-16 years. The aetiopathogensis of this disorder remains unknown, with misinformation about its natural history. Non-surgical treatments are aimed to reduce the number of operations by preventing curve progression. Although bracing and physiotherapy are common treatments in much of the world, their effectiveness has never been rigorously assessed. Technological advances have much improved the ability of surgeons to safely correct the deformity while maintaining sagittal and coronal balance. However, we do not have long-term results of these changing surgical treatments. Much has yet to be learned about the general health, quality of life, and self-image of both treated and untreated patients with AIS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

              The lack of a reliable, universally acceptable system for classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has made comparisons between various types of operative treatment an impossible task. Furthermore, long-term outcomes cannot be determined because of the great variations in the description of study groups. We developed a new classification system with three components: curve type (1 through 6), a lumbar spine modifier (A, B, or C), and a sagittal thoracic modifier (-, N, or +). The six curve types have specific characteristics, on coronal and sagittal radiographs, that differentiate structural and nonstructural curves in the proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar regions. The lumbar spine modifier is based on the relationship of the center sacral vertical line to the apex of the lumbar curve, and the sagittal thoracic modifier is based on the sagittal curve measurement from the fifth to the twelfth thoracic level. A minus sign represents a curve of less than +10 degrees, N represents a curve of 10 degrees to 40 degrees, and a plus sign represents a curve of more than +40 degrees. Five surgeons, members of the Scoliosis Research Society who had developed the new system and who had previously tested the reliability of the King classification on radiographs of twenty-seven patients, measured the same radiographs (standing coronal and lateral as well as supine side-bending views) to test the reliability of the new classification. A randomly chosen independent group of seven surgeons, also members of the Scoliosis Research Society, tested the reliability and validity of the classification as well. The interobserver and intraobserver kappa values for the curve type were, respectively, 0.92 and 0.83 for the five developers of the system and 0.740 and 0.893 for the independent group of seven scoliosis surgeons. In the independent group, the mean interobserver and intraobserver kappa values were 0.800 and 0.840 for the lumbar modifier and 0.938 and 0.970 for the sagittal thoracic modifier. These kappa values were all in the good-to-excellent range (>0.75), except for the interobserver reliability of the independent group for the curve type (kappa = 0.74), which fell just below this level. This new two-dimensional classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, as tested by two groups of surgeons, was shown to be much more reliable than the King system. Additional studies are necessary to determine the versatility, reliability, and accuracy of the classification for defining the vertebrae to be included in an arthrodesis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                stefano.negrini@unibs.it
                sabrina.donzelli@isico.it
                agabriele.aulisa@opbg.net
                dariusz.czaprowski@interia.pl
                sbosnjak@ualberta.ca
                demauroy@aol.com
                diers@diers.de
                tgri69@otenet.gr
                patrick.knott@rosalindfranklin.edu
                kotwicki@ump.edu.pl
                ottawascoliosis@gmail.com
                cmarti@sdwpt.com
                tmaruyama17@yahoo.co.jp
                jpobrien@scoliosis.org
                nprice@cmh.edu
                eparent@ualberta.ca
                ++ 34 932091330 , rigoquera@gmail.com
                michele.romano@isico.it
                luke@nationalscoliosiscenter.com
                jwynne@bostonoandp.com
                fabio.zaina@isico.it
                Journal
                Scoliosis Spinal Disord
                Scoliosis Spinal Disord
                Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                2397-1789
                10 January 2018
                10 January 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000417571846, GRID grid.7637.5, Clinical and Experimental Sciences Department, , University of Brescia Viale Europa 11, ; Brescia, Italy
                [2 ]IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.419440.c, ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), ; Via R. Bellarmino 13/1, 20141 Milan, Italy
                [4 ]U.O.C. of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Children’s Hospital Bambino Gesù, Institute of Scientific Research, 00165 Rome, Italy
                [5 ]Center of Body Posture, Olsztyn, Poland
                [6 ]Department of Physiotherapy, Józef Rusiecki University College, Olsztyn, Poland
                [7 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, , University of Alberta, ; Edmonton, Canada
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0693 8815, GRID grid.413574.0, Alberta Health Services, Department of Surgery, ; Edmonton, Canada
                [9 ]Orthopedic Medicine - Clinique du Parc, Lyon, France
                [10 ]GRID grid.410607.4, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, , University Medical Center, ; Mainz, Germany
                [11 ]GRID grid.417374.2, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, , “Tzaneio” General Hospital of Piraeus, ; Piraeus, Greece
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0388 7807, GRID grid.262641.5, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, ; North Chicago, IL USA
                [13 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2205 0971, GRID grid.22254.33, Department of Spine Disorders and Pediatric Orthopedics, , University of Medical Sciences, ; Poznan, Poland
                [14 ]Scoliosis Physiotherapy & Posture Centre, 231 McLeod Street, Ottawa, Ontario K2P0Z8 Canada
                [15 ]Schroth-Barcelona Institute, LLC, Spinal Dynamics of Wisconsin, SC., Barcelona, Spain
                [16 ]Saitama Prefectural Rehabilitation Center, Saitama, Japan
                [17 ]National Scoliosis Foundation, Stoughton, MA USA
                [18 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2179 926X, GRID grid.266756.6, Section of Spine Surgery, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, , UMKC Orthopedics, ; Kansas City, MO USA
                [19 ]Department of Physical Therapy, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4 Canada
                [20 ]National Scoliosis Center, 3023 Hamaker Court, Suite LL-50, Fairfax, VA 22124 USA
                [21 ]Boston Orthotics & Prosthetics, Boston, MA USA
                [22 ]Salvá SLP (E. Salvá Institute), Vía Augusta 185, 08021 Barcelona, Spain
                Article
                145
                10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8
                5795289
                29435499
                1abc344b-292f-4973-b661-0ac742fe3f84
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 18 July 2017
                : 6 November 2017
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                idiopathic scoliosis,treatment,guidelines
                idiopathic scoliosis, treatment, guidelines

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content188

                Cited by173

                Most referenced authors2,477