20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A Brief Instrument to Assess Both Burnout and Professional Fulfillment in Physicians: Reliability and Validity, Including Correlation with Self-Reported Medical Errors, in a Sample of Resident and Practicing Physicians

      case-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI), a 16-item instrument to assess physicians’ professional fulfillment and burnout, designed for sensitivity to change attributable to interventions or other factors affecting physician well-being.

          Methods

          A sample of 250 physicians completed the PFI, a measure of self-reported medical errors, and previously validated measures including the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), a one-item burnout measure, the World Health Organization’s abbreviated quality of life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), and PROMIS short-form depression, anxiety, and sleep-related impairment scales. Between 2 and 3 weeks later, 227 (91%) repeated the PFI and the sleep-related impairment scale.

          Results

          Principal components analysis justified PFI subscales for professional fulfillment, work exhaustion, and interpersonal disengagement. Test-retest reliability estimates were 0.82 for professional fulfillment (α = 0.91), 0.80 for work exhaustion (α = 0.86), 0.71 for interpersonal disengagement (α = 0.92), and 0.80 for overall burnout (α = 0.92). PFI burnout measures correlated highly ( r ≥ 0.50) with their closest related MBI equivalents. Cohen’s d effect size differences in self-reported medical errors for high versus low burnout classified using the PFI and the MBI were 0.55 and 0.44, respectively. PFI scales correlated in expected directions with sleep-related impairment, depression, anxiety, and WHOQOL-BREF scores. PFI scales demonstrated sufficient sensitivity to detect expected effects of a two-point (range 8–40) change in sleep-related impairment.

          Conclusions

          PFI scales have good performance characteristics including sensitivity to change and offer a novel contribution by assessing professional fulfillment in addition to burnout.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The measurement of experienced burnout

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment

            (1998)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.

              The Triple Aim-enhancing patient experience, improving population health, and reducing costs-is widely accepted as a compass to optimize health system performance. Yet physicians and other members of the health care workforce report widespread burnout and dissatisfaction. Burnout is associated with lower patient satisfaction, reduced health outcomes, and it may increase costs. Burnout thus imperils the Triple Aim. This article recommends that the Triple Aim be expanded to a Quadruple Aim, adding the goal of improving the work life of health care providers, including clinicians and staff.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                trockel@stanford.edu
                Journal
                Acad Psychiatry
                Acad Psychiatry
                Academic Psychiatry
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1042-9670
                1545-7230
                1 December 2017
                1 December 2017
                2018
                : 42
                : 1
                : 11-24
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000419368956, GRID grid.168010.e, Stanford University, ; Stanford, CA USA
                [2 ]The Risk Authority Stanford, Palo Alto, CA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-5791
                Article
                849
                10.1007/s40596-017-0849-3
                5794850
                29196982
                1ac944a9-6273-4432-a2d7-812707e56a68
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 24 June 2017
                : 1 November 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: SUMIT
                Award ID: N/A
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Empirical Report
                Custom metadata
                © Academic Psychiatry 2018

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content229

                Cited by152

                Most referenced authors717