6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Comparative Physiology of Acoustic and Allied Central Analyzers

      Acta Oto-Laryngologica
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To exploit comparisons among classes of vertebrates and invertebrates, and between higher and lower levels of the brain, and between modalities, some important needs and opportunities for new research into the way central processing of acoustic input takes place are pointed out. Most of these are suggested by unfamiliar results on fish and reptiles that call for new controls in mammalian experiments as well as more systematic study of nonmammalian taxa. Three frameworks or basic agendas are outlined; i) systematic comparison of dynamical properties to acoustic variables including especially repetition at different rates and the related states of expectation; ii) comparison of response measures, including especially sequences such as oscillations and measures of assembly cooperativity such as synchrony, coherence and bicoherence; and iii) comparison of auditory subsystems, including especially modal categories such as complex feature selective regions and small sets. Some recent and some new results are summarized on human acoustic and non-mammalian event related potentials (ERPs) in response to expectations. When a regular and frequent standard stimulus is omitted, the omitted stimulus potential (OSP) after conditioning with low repetition rates (long ISIs--1-3 s) is a slow, broad positivity P600-900), previously known. With high rates (ISI < 1 s), a new form of response appears, with fast components (P22), different dynamics and less dependence on attention. Slow and fast OSPs each show a constant peak latency after the due-time of the missing stimulus, as though a temporal expectation has been learned. Unlike the visual OSP we have reported earlier, both fast and slow can occur together in the 1-2 Hz range. Very few conditioning stimuli suffice to create the "expectation" that causes an OSP--only two for the slow type. These and more familiar ERPs, considered in human subjects to index cognitive events, need to be compared in other classes of vertebrates and invertebrates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Single-neuron labeling in the cat auditory nerve.

          M Liberman (1982)
          Single auditory nerve fibers in the cat were labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase. The sample of fibers was selected to represent different response types over a wide range of characteristic frequencies. All 56 labeled neurons were found to be radial fibers innervating inner hair cells, suggesting that none of the single-unit data reported to date has been from the outer hair cell innervation. Differences in rates of spontaneous discharge and thresholds to tones among these labeled neurons were closely correlated with morphological differences in the caliber and location of their unmyelinated terminals on the body of the inner hair cell.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Two Visual Systems

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Feature Linking via Synchronization among Distributed Assemblies: Simulations of Results from Cat Visual Cortex

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acta Oto-Laryngologica
                Acta Oto-Laryngologica
                Informa UK Limited
                0001-6489
                1651-2251
                July 08 2009
                July 08 2009
                : 117
                : sup532
                : 13-21
                Article
                10.3109/00016489709126139
                9442839
                1ae3abf3-79de-49eb-bda5-c7aa4cde8f3e
                © 2009
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log