2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scientific, professional and experiential validation of the model of preventive behaviours at work: protocol of a modified Delphi Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          To offer an in-depth understanding of preventive behaviours, those complex behaviours considered as levers to foster work prevention, recent theoretical and empirical studies permitted to develop the model of preventive behaviours at work. The next step is to validate the model with researchers, professionals and workers. This article aims to describe the study protocol that will be used to validate the model of preventive behaviours at work.

          Methods and analysis

          This Delphi Study proposes seven systematic steps to conduct a scientifically rigorous validation study based on scientific and professional experts’ opinion. A focus group to collect workers’ opinion about the model has also been included in the protocol. Thirty experts (researchers and professionals) will be selected regarding their experience (eg, at least 5 years of experience) and expertise (eg, having published at least one article as the first author in the last 3 years) towards workers’ health or organisational behaviours. Workers will be recruited to have a diversity in terms of age, gender and working conditions. Quantitative data will be analysed to calculate the percentage of experts’ agreement on four content validity indicators (ie, comprehensiveness, representativeness, relevance and clarity). Qualitative data will be examined through a thematic analysis strategy.

          Ethics and dissemination

          Approval of the research ethics board of the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale Nationale has been obtained. Findings will be shared with various stakeholders inclusive of researchers, professionals and workers. Findings will be disseminated in workshops, peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Determination and quantification of content validity.

          M Lynn (1986)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research.

            The aim of this paper was to provide insight into the Delphi technique by outlining our personal experiences during its use over a 10-year period in a variety of applications. As a means of achieving consensus on an issue, the Delphi research method has become widely used in healthcare research generally and nursing research in particular. The literature on this technique is expanding, mainly addressing what it is and how it should be used. However, there is still much confusion and uncertainty surrounding it, particularly about issues such as modifications, consensus, anonymity, definition of experts, how 'experts' are selected and how non-respondents are pursued. This issues that arise when planning and carrying out a Delphi study include the definition of consensus; the issue of anonymity vs. quasi-anonymity for participants; how to estimate the time needed to collect the data, analyse each 'round', feed back results to participants, and gain their responses to this feedback; how to define and select the 'experts' who will be asked to participate; how to enhance response rates; and how many 'rounds' to conduct. Many challenges and questions are raised when using the Delphi technique, but there is no doubt that it is an important method for achieving consensus on issues where none previously existed. Researchers need to adapt the method to suit their particular study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                13 September 2020
                : 10
                : 9
                : e035606
                Affiliations
                [1]departmentDepartment of Rehabilitation , Université Laval , Québec, Québec, Canada
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Alexandra Lecours; Alexandra.Lecours@ 123456fmed.ulaval.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4485-7829
                Article
                bmjopen-2019-035606
                10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035606
                7488793
                1aef6fad-b6ec-44b1-bb23-4b948c51b1b1
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 08 November 2019
                : 01 August 2020
                : 06 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Fonds d’établissement de jeune chercheur from the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration;
                Award ID: IS120195
                Categories
                Occupational and Environmental Medicine
                1506
                1716
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                occupational & industrial medicine,health & safety,human resource management,rehabilitation medicine,public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article