9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Expanding Role of the COX Inhibitor/Opioid Receptor Agonist Combination in the Management of Pain

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pain management in both outpatient and inpatient settings demands a multidisciplinary approach entailing medical, physical and psychological therapies. Among these, multimodal analgesic regimens stand out as a promising treatment options. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitor/opioid receptor agonist combinations hold great potential as effective pillars in the multimodal pain management by providing adequate analgesia with fewer safety risks due to COX inhibitors’ opioid-sparing effect. Thus, these combinations, either freely or in fixed-dose formulation, offer a feasible option for the prescribing clinicians who seek to maximise therapeutic effect while simultaneously minimise adverse effects. The selection of the appropriate non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and opioid agent at optimal doses is essential. It should be tailored to the patients’ analgesic necessities, and his/her gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk, and potential concurrent aspirin use. Moreover, it should allow for addiction risk and the potential opioid-induced bowel dysfunction and constipation. To ensure an optimal match between the characteristics of the patient and the properties of the chosen medication, and to guide adequate and well-tolerated treatment decisions, it is of paramount importance to expand clinicians’ knowledge of the currently available COX inhibitor/opioid receptor agonist combinations. This invited narrative review deals with the literature evidence covering the components of multimodal opioid-sparing analgesic regimens. Also, it provides insights into the clinically relevant choice criteria to ensure a patient-tailored analgesia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee

          To develop an evidence-based guideline for the comprehensive management of osteoarthritis (OA) as a collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the Arthritis Foundation, updating the 2012 ACR recommendations for the management of hand, hip, and knee OA.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Causes and consequences of inadequate management of acute pain.

            Intense acute pain afflicts millions of patients each year. Despite the recently increased focus on the importance of pain control, management of acute pain has remained suboptimal.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An evidence-based update on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

              Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including both traditional nonselective NSAIDs and the selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, are widely used for their anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. NSAIDs are a necessary choice in pain management because of the integrated role of the COX pathway in the generation of inflammation and in the biochemical recognition of pain. This group of drugs has recently come under scrutiny because of recent focus in the literature on the various adverse effects that can occur when applying NSAIDs. This review will provide an educational update on the current evidence of the efficacy and adverse effects of NSAIDs. It aims to answer the following questions: (1) are there clinically important differences in the efficacy and safety between the different NSAIDs, (2) if there are differences, which are the ones that are more effective and associated with fewer adverse effects, and (3) which are the effective therapeutic approaches that could reduce the adverse effects of NSAIDs. Finally, an algorithm is proposed which delineates a general decision-making tree to select the most appropriate analgesic for an individual patient based on the evidence reviewed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                giuvarr@gmail.com
                Journal
                Drugs
                Drugs
                Drugs
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0012-6667
                1179-1950
                4 August 2020
                4 August 2020
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Paolo Procacci Foundation (PPF), Via Tacito 7, 00193 Rome, Italy
                [2 ]World Institute of Pain, Winston-Salem, USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.428397.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0385 0924, Duke-NUS Medical School, ; 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
                [4 ]GRID grid.439257.e, ISNI 0000 0000 8726 5837, Moorfields Eye Hospital, ; London, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.459798.e, NEMA Research Group, ; Naples, FL USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.6603.3, ISNI 0000000121167908, Medical School, , University of Cyprus, ; Nicosia, Cyprus
                [7 ]GRID grid.158820.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 2611, Department MESVA, , University of L’Aquila, ; 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3822-2923
                Article
                1369
                10.1007/s40265-020-01369-x
                7401469
                32749653
                1b0aae96-7061-47b5-86a9-b58e17f55678
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                Categories
                Review Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article