26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Seismic Surveys Negatively Affect Humpback Whale Singing Activity off Northern Angola

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Passive acoustic monitoring was used to document the presence of singing humpback whales off the coast of Northern Angola, and opportunistically test for the effect of seismic survey activity in the vicinity on the number of singing whales. Two Marine Autonomous Recording Units (MARUs) were deployed between March and December 2008 in the offshore environment. Song was first heard in mid June and continued through the remaining duration of the study. Seismic survey activity was heard regularly during two separate periods, consistently throughout July and intermittently in mid-October/November. Numbers of singers were counted during the first ten minutes of every hour for the period from 24 May to 1 December, and Generalized Additive Mixed Models (GAMMs) were used to assess the effect of survey day (seasonality), hour (diel variation), moon phase and received levels of seismic survey pulses (measured from a single pulse during each ten-minute sampled period) on singer number. Application of GAMMs indicated significant seasonal variation, which was the most pronounced effect when assessing the full dataset across the entire season (p<0.001); however seasonality almost entirely dropped out of top-ranked models when applied to a reduced dataset during the July period of seismic survey activity. Diel variation was significant in both the full and reduced datasets (from p<0.01 to p<0.05) and often included in the top-ranked models. The number of singers significantly decreased with increasing received level of seismic survey pulses (from p<0.01 to p<0.05); this explanatory variable was included among the top ranked models for one MARU in the full dataset and both MARUs in the reduced dataset. This suggests that the breeding display of humpback whales is disrupted by seismic survey activity, and thus merits further attention and study, and potentially conservation action in the case of sensitive breeding populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Songs of humpback whales.

          1) Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) produce a series of beautiful and varied sounds for a period of 7 to 30 minutes and then repeat the same series with considerable precision. We call such a performance "singing" and each repeated series of sounds a "song." 2) All prolonged sound patterns (recorded so far) of this species are in song form, and each individual adheres to its own song type. 3) There seem to be several song types around which whales construct their songs, but individual variations are pronounced (there is only a very rough species-specific song pattern). 4) Songs are repeated without any obvious pause between them; thus song sessions may continue for several hours. 5) The sequence of themes in successive songs by the same individual is the same. Although the number of phrases per theme varies, no theme is ever completely omitted in our sample. 6) Loud sounds in the ocean, for example dynamite blasts, do not seem to affect the whale's songs. 7) The sex of the performer of any of the songs we have studied is unknown. 8) The function of the songs is unknown.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Acoustic properties of humpback whale songs.

            A vertical array of five hydrophones was used to measure the acoustic field in the vertical plane of singing humpback whales. Once a singer was located, two swimmers with snorkel gear were deployed to determine the orientation of the whale and position the boat so that the array could be deployed in front of the whale at a minimum standoff distance of at least 10 m. The spacing of the hydrophones was 7 m with the deepest hydrophone deployed at a depth of 35 m. An eight-channel TASCAM recorder with a bandwidth of 24 kHz was used to record the hydrophone signals. The location (distance and depth) of the singer was determined by computing the time of arrival differences between the hydrophone signals. The maximum source level varied between individual units in a song, with values between 151 and 173 dB re 1 microPa. One of the purposes of this study was to estimate potential sound exposure of nearby conspecifics. The acoustic field determined by considering the relative intensity of higher frequency harmonics in the signals indicated that the sounds are projected in the horizontal direction despite the singer being canted head downward anywhere from about 25 degrees to 90 degrees. High-frequency harmonics extended beyond 24 kHz, suggesting that humpback whales may have an upper frequency limit of hearing as high as 24 kHz.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Blue and fin whales observed on a seafloor array in the northeast pacific.

              Calling blue and fin whales have been tracked using relative travel times and amplitudes from both direct and multipath arrivals to a seafloor array of seismometers. Calls of three fin whales swimming in the same general direction, but several kilometers apart, are believed to represent communication between the whales because of signature differences in call character, an alternating call pattern, and coordination of call and respiration times. Whale call tracks, call patterns, call character, and swimming speeds were examined during periods with and without the presence of noise. Noise sources included airguns, when the whales were subject to sound levels of up to 143 dB P-P (peak-to-peak) re: 1 microPa over the 10 to 60-Hz band, and transits of merchant ships, when the whales received continuous levels up to 106 dB rms re: 1 microPa over the 10 to 60-Hz band (115 dB P-P). Whale responses associated with these noises remain arguable.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                11 March 2014
                : 9
                : 3
                : e86464
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, Bronx, New York, United States of America
                [2 ]American Museum of Natural History, Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, New York, New York, United States of America
                [3 ]New York Aquarium, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America
                Heriot-Watt University, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have the following potential competing interest according to the PLOS ONE policy and definition. Funding for the cost and deployment of equipment was provided by Angola Liquefied Natural Gas (ALNG). However, the authors were working completely independently of funders, established the approach and design of the study, reported objectively on the results, and were under no obligation to do otherwise. Therefore this does not alter the authors' adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: SC TC HR. Performed the experiments: SC SS TC. Analyzed the data: SC SS CB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SS. Wrote the paper: SC SS TC. Managed and oversaw research project and budget with project team and funder, and provided critical reading of various versions of the manuscript, as well as final sign off as project lead: HR.

                Article
                PONE-D-11-23200
                10.1371/journal.pone.0086464
                3949672
                24618836
                1b35a63f-628c-4bc3-9ccf-d18ccde60edb
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 15 November 2011
                : 13 December 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funding for the cost and deployment of equipment used by WCS was provided by Angola Liquefied Natural Gas (ALNG). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The interpretation of results does not reflect the views of ALNG.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Ecology
                Ecological Environments
                Marine Environments
                Behavioral Ecology
                Conservation Science
                Environmental Protection
                Evolutionary Biology
                Animal Behavior
                Behavioral Ecology
                Marine Biology
                Marine Conservation
                Marine Monitoring
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Mammalogy
                Earth sciences
                Environmental Sciences
                Marine and aquatic sciences
                Oceanography
                Ocean Properties
                Oceans
                Atlantic Ocean
                Marine Monitoring
                Physics
                Classical Mechanics
                Acoustics

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article