3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of oscillometry devices using active mechanical test loads

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 4 , the Oscillometry Harmonisation Study Group
      ERJ Open Research
      European Respiratory Society

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Noninvasiveness, low cooperation demand and the potential for detailed physiological characterisation have promoted the use of oscillometry in the assessment of lung function. However, concerns have been raised about the comparability of measurement outcomes delivered by the different oscillometry devices. The present study compares the performances of oscillometers in the measurement of mechanical test loads with and without simulated breathing.

          Six devices (five were commercially available and one was custom made) were tested with mechanical test loads combining resistors ( R), gas compliances ( C) and a tube inertance ( L), to mimic respiratory resistance ( R rs) and reactance ( X rs) spectra encountered in clinical practice. A ventilator was used to simulate breathing at tidal volumes of 300 and 700 mL at frequencies of 30 and 15 min −1, respectively. Measurements were evaluated in terms of R, C, L, resonance frequency ( f res), reactance area ( A X ) and resistance change between 5 and 20 or 19 Hz ( R 5–20(19)).

          Increasing test loads caused progressive deviations in R rs and X rs from calculated values at various degrees in the different oscillometers. While mean values of R rs were recovered acceptably, some devices exhibited serious distortions in the frequency dependences of R rs and X rs, leading to large errors in C, L, f res, A X and R 5–20(19). The results were largely independent of the simulated breathing.

          Simplistic calibration procedures and mouthpiece corrections, in addition to unknown instrumental and signal processing factors, may be responsible for the large differences in oscillometry measures. Rigorous testing and ongoing harmonisation efforts are necessary to better exploit the diagnostic and scientific potential of oscillometry.

          Abstract

          The clinical utility of oscillometry is limited by the lack of standardisation of devices. This study tested six oscillometers, and reveals very different performances at higher mechanical impedances observed in children and adults with lung disease. http://bit.ly/317sfjH

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments.

          The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is a noninvasive method with which to measure respiratory mechanics. FOT employs small-amplitude pressure oscillations superimposed on the normal breathing and therefore has the advantage over conventional lung function techniques that it does not require the performance of respiratory manoeuvres. The present European Respiratory Society Task Force Report describes the basic principle of the technique and gives guidelines for the application and interpretation of FOT as a routine lung function test in the clinical setting, for both adult and paediatric populations. FOT data, especially those measured at the lower frequencies, are sensitive to airway obstruction, but do not discriminate between obstructive and restrictive lung disorders. There is no consensus regarding the sensitivity of FOT for bronchodilation testing in adults. Values of respiratory resistance have proved sensitive to bronchodilation in children, although the reported cutoff levels remain to be confirmed in future studies. Forced oscillation technique is a reliable method in the assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in adults and children. Moreover, in contrast with spirometry where a deep inspiration is needed, forced oscillation technique does not modify the airway smooth muscle tone. Forced oscillation technique has been shown to be as sensitive as spirometry in detecting impairments of lung function due to smoking or exposure to occupational hazards. Together with the minimal requirement for the subject's cooperation, this makes forced oscillation technique an ideal lung function test for epidemiological and field studies. Novel applications of forced oscillation technique in the clinical setting include the monitoring of respiratory mechanics during mechanical ventilation and sleep.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Detection of expiratory flow limitation in COPD using the forced oscillation technique.

            Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during tidal breathing is a major determinant of dynamic hyperinflation and exercise limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Current methods of detecting this are either invasive or unsuited to following changes breath-by-breath. It was hypothesised that tidal flow limitation would substantially reduce the total respiratory system reactance (Xrs) during expiration, and that this reduction could be used to reliably detect if EFL was present. To test this, 5-Hz forced oscillations were applied at the mouth in seven healthy subjects and 15 COPD patients (mean +/- sD forced expiratory volume in one second was 36.8 +/- 11.5% predicted) during quiet breathing. COPD breaths were analysed (n=206) and classified as flow-limited if flow decreased as alveolar pressure increased, indeterminate if flow decreased at constant alveolar pressure, or nonflow-limited. Of these, 85 breaths were flow-limited, 80 were not and 41 were indeterminate. Among other indices, mean inspiratory minus mean expiratory Xrs (deltaXrs) and minimum expiratory Xrs (Xexp,min) identified flow-limited breaths with 100% specificity and sensitivity using a threshold between 2.53-3.12 cmH2O x s x L(-1) (deltaXrs) and -7.38- -6.76 cmH2O x s x L(-1) (Xexp,min) representing 6.0% and 3.9% of the total range of values respectively. No flow-limited breaths were seen in the normal subjects by either method. Within-breath respiratory system reactance provides an accurate, reliable and noninvasive technique to detect expiratory flow limitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Respiratory impedance in healthy subjects: baseline values and bronchodilator response.

              Because of the minimal demand for cooperation by the subject, the forced oscillation technique is increasingly employed in routine lung function testing. However, comprehensive and device-independent values of respiratory impedance at baseline and after bronchodilation have not been established for healthy adults. The aim of this multicentre study was to collect impedance data from 4 to 26 Hz in healthy Caucasian subjects between 18 and 80 years of age. Five different devices were employed to assess baseline values and the bronchodilator response. Altogether, 368 subjects were examined. Despite adjustment for anthropometry, the impedance spectra differed in frequency dependence between the centres, and hence could not be pooled. However, resistance at all frequencies except 20 and 25 Hz, and the low-frequency (≤14 Hz) values of reactance did not exhibit a centre dependence. The regression equations for resistance reflected a greater height dependence in males and a greater weight dependence in both males and females than those published previously. Bronchodilation resulted in a statistically significant decrease (11%) in resistance and a 95th percentile equal to a 32% decrease in resistance at low frequency. We conclude that rigorous calibration procedures should be developed to ensure data compatibility. Furthermore, new reference equations based on different setups are recommended to replace those established with a single device.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ERJ Open Res
                ERJ Open Res
                ERJOR
                erjor
                ERJ Open Research
                European Respiratory Society
                2312-0541
                October 2019
                23 December 2019
                : 5
                : 4
                : 00160-2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Oscillometry Unit, Centre for Innovative Medicine and Meakins-Christie Laboratories of the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
                [2 ]CIUSSS de L'Ouest-de-L'Ile-de-Montréal, QC, Canada
                [3 ]Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada
                [4 ]Dept of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
                Author notes
                Zoltán Hantos, Dept of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 78 Üllői út, H-1082 Budapest, Hungary. E-mail: hantos.zoltan@ 123456med.u-szeged.hu
                Article
                00160-2019
                10.1183/23120541.00160-2019
                6926364
                31886158
                1b38ffd0-f6e0-4d9c-a020-66095bb8851f
                Copyright ©ERS 2019

                This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

                History
                : 21 June 2019
                : 07 October 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Hungary)
                Award ID: K 128701
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Lung Function
                10
                18

                Comments

                Comment on this article