0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Extraction of tungsten from scheelite using hydrodynamic and acoustic cavitation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Energy efficient and intensified leaching by hydrodynamic and acoustic cavitation.

          • The acoustic cavitation intensity is optimized by multiphysics simulation.

          • Acoustic cavitation combined with a weak hydrodynamic effect gives two times better results.

          • Hydrodynamic and acoustic cavitation improved recovery rate of tungsten by 50%

          Abstract

          The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of hydrodynamic and acoustic cavitation (HAC) on the leaching efficiency of tungsten. The aim is to reduce energy use and to improve the recovery rate. The goal is also to carry out a leaching process at a much lower temperature than in an autoclave process that is currently used in the industry. Energy-efficient initiation and collapse of cavitation bubbles require optimization of (i) vibro-acoustic response of the reactor structure, (ii) multiple excitation frequencies adapted to the optimized reactor geometry, and (iii) hydrodynamic cavitation with respect to orifice geometry and flow conditions. The objective is to modify and apply a previously in house developed high power cavitation reactor in order to recover tungsten by leaching of the dissolution of scheelite in sodium hydroxide. In this process, various experimental conditions like dual-frequency excitation, different orifice geometry have been investigated. The numerically optimized reactor concept was excited by two frequencies 23 kHz and 39 43 kHz in various flow conditions. The effects of leaching time, leaching temperature, ultrasonic power and geometry of orifice plates have been studied. The leaching temperature was varied from 40 °C to 80 °C. The concentration of leaching reagent sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was 10 mol/L.The results were compared to conventional chemical leaching. Energy supplement with acoustic cavitation of 130 kWh/kg concentrate resulted in a leaching recovery of tungsten (WO 3) of 71.5%, compared to 36.7% obtained in absence of ultrasound. The results confirm that the method developed is energy efficient and gives a recovery rate potentially better than current autoclave technology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Ultrasound: a powerful tool for leaching

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Engineering design methods for cavitation reactors II: Hydrodynamic cavitation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of ultrasonic-assisted and regular leaching of germanium from by-product of zinc metallurgy

              A major source of germanium recovery and also the source of this research is the by-product of lead and zinc metallurgical process. The primary purpose of the research is to investigate the effects of ultrasonic assisted and regular methods on the leaching yield of germanium from roasted slag containing germanium. In the study, the HCl-CaCl2 mixed solution is adopted as the reacting system and the Ca(ClO)2 used as the oxidant. Through six single factor (leaching time, temperature, amount of Ca(ClO)2, acid concentration, concentration of CaCl2 solution, ultrasonic power) experiments and the comparison of the two methods, it is found the optimum collective of germanium for ultrasonic-assisted method is obtained at temperature 80 °C for a leaching duration of 40 min. The optimum concentration for hydrochloric acid, CaCl2 and oxidizing agent are identified to be 3.5 mol/L, 150 g/L and 58.33 g/L, respectively. In addition, 700 W is the best ultrasonic power and an over-high power is adverse in the leaching process. Under the optimum condition, the recovery of germanium could reach up to 92.7%. While, the optimum leaching condition for regular leaching method is same to ultrasonic-assisted method, except regular method consume 100 min and the leaching rate of Ge 88.35% is lower about 4.35%. All in all, the experiment manifests that the leaching time can be reduced by as much as 60% and the leaching rate of Ge can be increased by 3-5% with the application of ultrasonic tool, which is mainly thanks to the mechanical action of ultrasonic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ultrason Sonochem
                Ultrason Sonochem
                Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
                Elsevier
                1350-4177
                1873-2828
                07 December 2020
                March 2021
                07 December 2020
                : 71
                : 105408
                Affiliations
                Engineering Acoustics, Dept of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources of Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. orjan.johansson@ 123456ltu.se
                Article
                S1350-4177(20)31712-0 105408
                10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105408
                7786575
                33310454
                1b5514ca-cd56-4d60-ba13-8803192f4a4b
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 6 April 2020
                : 2 September 2020
                : 9 November 2020
                Categories
                Original Research Article

                ultrasonic reactor,acoustic and hydrodynamic cavitation,tungsten,scheelite

                Comments

                Comment on this article