GROUP APPROACHES FOR IMPROVING STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIALECTICAL INQUIRY, DEVIL'S ADVOCACY, AND CONSENSUS.

SCHWEIGER, D. M.; SANDBERG, W. R.; Ragan, J. W.

doi:10.2307/255859

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

GROUP APPROACHES FOR IMPROVING STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIALECTICAL INQUIRY, DEVIL'S ADVOCACY, AND CONSENSUS.

Author(s): D. M. Schweiger , W. R. Sandberg , J. W. Ragan

Publication date Created: March 01 1986

Publication date (Print): March 01 1986

Journal: Academy of Management Journal

Publisher: JSTOR

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Title: Academy of Management Journal

Abbreviated Title: Academy of Management Journal

Publisher: JSTOR

ISSN (Print): 0001-4273

ISSN (Electronic): 1948-0989

Publication date Created: March 01 1986

Publication date (Print): March 01 1986

Volume: 29

Issue: 1

Pages: 51-71

Article

DOI: 10.2307/255859

SO-VID: 1b900dd6-fd65-4685-96e0-e10650503993

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 112

See all cited by

GROUP APPROACHES FOR IMPROVING STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIALECTICAL INQUIRY, DEVIL'S ADVOCACY, AND CONSENSUS.

Read this article at

Related collections

Advocacy for Maternal and Women’s Health

Author and article information

Journal

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 1,635

Cited by 112