5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Randomised phase 3 study of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without nadroparin in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer: the NVALT-8 study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Retrospective studies suggest that low molecular weight heparin may delay the development of metastasis in patients with resected NSCLC.

          Methods

          Multicentre phase 3 study with patients with completely resected NSCLC who were randomised after surgery to receive chemotherapy with or without nadroparin. The main exclusion criteria were R1/2 and wedge/segmental resection. FDG-PET was required. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS).

          Results

          Among 235 registered patients, 202 were randomised (nadroparin: n = 100; control n = 102). Slow accrual enabled a decrease in the number of patients needed from 600 to 202, providing 80% power to compare RFS with 94 events (α = 0.05; 2-sided). There were no differences in bleeding events between the two groups. The median RFS was 65.2 months (95% CI, 36—NA) in the nadroparin arm and 37.7 months (95% CI, 22.7—NA) in the control arm (HR 0.77 (95% CI, 0.53–1.13, P = 0.19). FDG-PET SUVmax ≥10 predicted a greater likelihood of recurrence in the first year (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.22–0.9, P = 0.05).

          Conclusions

          Adjuvant nadroparin did not improve RFS in patients with resected NSCLC. In this study, a high SUVmax predicted a greater likelihood of recurrence in the first year.

          Clinical trial registration

          Netherlands Trial registry: NTR1250/1217.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0

          The aim of this guideline is to provide a minimum standard for the acquisition and interpretation of PET and PET/CT scans with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). This guideline will therefore address general information about [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and is provided to help the physician and physicist to assist to carrying out, interpret, and document quantitative FDG PET/CT examinations, but will concentrate on the optimisation of diagnostic quality and quantitative information.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Long-term results of the international adjuvant lung cancer trial evaluating adjuvant Cisplatin-based chemotherapy in resected lung cancer.

            PURPOSE Based on 5-year or shorter-term follow-up data in recent randomized trials, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is now generally recommended after complete surgical resection for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the results of the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial study with three additional years of follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with completely resected NSCLC were randomly assigned to three or four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy or to observation. Cox models were used to evaluate treatment effect according to follow-up duration. Results The trial included 1,867 patients with a median follow-up of 7.5 years. Results showed a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.02; P = .10) and on disease-free survival (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; P = .02). However, there was a significant difference between the results of overall survival before and after 5 years of follow-up (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.97; P = .01 v HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.07; P = .04) with P = .006 for interaction. Similar results were observed for disease-free survival. The analysis of non-lung cancer deaths for the whole period showed an HR of 1.34 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.81; P = .06). CONCLUSION These results confirm the significant efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy at 5 years. The difference in results beyond 5 years of follow-up underscores the need for the long-term follow-up of other adjuvant lung cancer trials and for a better identification of patients deriving long-term benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine plus cisplatin compared with observation in completely resected stage IB and II non-small-cell lung cancer: updated survival analysis of JBR-10.

              PURPOSE Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (ACT) is now an accepted standard for completely resected stage II and III A non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Long-term follow-up is important to document persistent benefit and late toxicity. We report here updated overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) data. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with completely resected stage IB (T2N0, n = 219) or II (T1-2N1, n = 263) NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive 4 cycles of vinorelbine/cisplatin or observation. All efficacy analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results Median follow-up was 9.3 years (range, 5.8 to 13.8; 33 lost to follow-up); there were 271 deaths in 482 randomly assigned patients. ACT continues to show a benefit (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.99; P = .04). There was a trend for interaction with disease stage (P = .09; HR for stage II, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.92; P = .01; stage IB, HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.52; P = .87). ACT resulted in significantly prolonged DSS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.97; P = .03). Observation was associated with significantly higher risk of death from lung cancer (P = .02), with no difference in rates of death from other causes or second primary malignancies between the arms. CONCLUSION Prolonged follow-up of patients from the JBR.10 trial continues to show a benefit in survival for adjuvant chemotherapy. This benefit appears to be confined to N1 patients. There was no increase in death from other causes in the chemotherapy arm.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +0031503616161 , h.j.m.groen@umcg.nl
                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                Br. J. Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                24 July 2019
                27 August 2019
                : 121
                : 5
                : 372-377
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0407 1981, GRID grid.4830.f, Department of Pulmonary Disease, , University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, ; Hanzeplein 1, Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, GRID grid.10417.33, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, , Radboud University Medical Center, ; Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9558 4598, GRID grid.4494.d, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, , University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, ; Hanzeplein 1, Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0501 9798, GRID grid.413508.b, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, , Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ; Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
                [5 ]ISNI 000000040459992X, GRID grid.5645.2, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, , Erasmus Medical Center, ; Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, GRID grid.10417.33, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, , Radboud University Medical Center, ; Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0547 5927, GRID grid.452600.5, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, , Isala Hospital, ; Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, Netherlands
                [8 ]Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Ommelander Hospital Group, Pastorieweg 1, 9679 BJ Scheemda, Netherlands
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0398 8384, GRID grid.413532.2, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, , Catharina Hospital, ; Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
                [10 ]GRID grid.415930.a, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, , Rijnstate Hospital, ; Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD Arnhem, Netherlands
                [11 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HVAmsterdam, Netherlands
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0622 1269, GRID grid.415960.f, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, , St Antonius Hospital, ; Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
                [13 ]GRID grid.430814.a, Department of Biometrics, , Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, ; Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [14 ]GRID grid.430814.a, Department of Thoracic Oncology, , Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, ; Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [15 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0480 1382, GRID grid.412966.e, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, , Maastricht University Medical Center, ; P. Debijelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
                Article
                533
                10.1038/s41416-019-0533-3
                6738047
                31337877
                1b97ed51-4817-4605-95d6-96a69794b6ac
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2019

                This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

                History
                : 1 November 2018
                : 13 June 2019
                : 4 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100010806, Amgen Inc. | Amgen Nederland (Amgen B.V. Netherlands);
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100004337, Roche (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd);
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100004622, KWF Kankerbestrijding (Dutch Cancer Society);
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100004312, Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly);
                Funded by: Eli Lilly Nederland BV Papendorpseweg 83, NL - 3528 BJ Utrecht Roche Nederland B.V. Beneluxlaan 2a 3446 GR Woerden Amgen B.V. Minervum 7061 | P.O. Box 3345 | 4800 DH Breda | The Netherlands KWF is the Dutch Cancer Foundation who supported this study with datamanagement and statistical support.
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Cancer Research UK 2019

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                non-small-cell lung cancer
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                non-small-cell lung cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article