95
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Drug development in Alzheimer’s disease: the path to 2025

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The global impact of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continues to increase, and focused efforts are needed to address this immense public health challenge. National leaders have set a goal to prevent or effectively treat AD by 2025. In this paper, we discuss the path to 2025, and what is feasible in this time frame given the realities and challenges of AD drug development, with a focus on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Under the current conditions, only drugs currently in late Phase 1 or later will have a chance of being approved by 2025. If pipeline attrition rates remain high, only a few compounds at best will meet this time frame. There is an opportunity to reduce the time and risk of AD drug development through an improvement in trial design; better trial infrastructure; disease registries of well-characterized participant cohorts to help with more rapid enrollment of appropriate study populations; validated biomarkers to better detect disease, determine risk and monitor disease progression as well as predict disease response; more sensitive clinical assessment tools; and faster regulatory review. To implement change requires efforts to build awareness, educate and foster engagement; increase funding for both basic and clinical research; reduce fragmented environments and systems; increase learning from successes and failures; promote data standardization and increase wider data sharing; understand AD at the basic biology level; and rapidly translate new knowledge into clinical development. Improved mechanistic understanding of disease onset and progression is central to more efficient AD drug development and will lead to improved therapeutic approaches and targets. The opportunity for more than a few new therapies by 2025 is small. Accelerating research and clinical development efforts and bringing DMTs to market sooner would have a significant impact on the future societal burden of AD. As these steps are put in place and plans come to fruition, e.g., approval of a DMT, it can be predicted that momentum will build, the process will be self-sustaining, and the path to 2025, and beyond, becomes clearer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Phase 3 solanezumab trials: Secondary outcomes in mild Alzheimer's disease patients.

          EXPEDITION and EXPEDITION2 were identically designed placebo-controlled phase 3 studies assessing effects of solanezumab, an antiamyloid monoclonal antibody binding soluble amyloid-β peptide, on cognitive and functional decline over 80 weeks in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Primary findings for both studies have been published.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Amnestic syndrome of the medial temporal type identifies prodromal AD: a longitudinal study.

            To compare the power of tests assessing different cognitive domains for the identification of prodromal Alzheimer disease (AD) among patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Given the early involvement of the medial temporal lobe, a precocious and specific pattern of memory disorders might be expected for the identification of prodromal AD. A total of 251 patients with MCI were tested at baseline by a standardized neuropsychological battery, which included the Free and Cued Selective Recall Reminding Test (FCSRT) for verbal episodic memory; the Benton Visual Retention Test for visual memory; the Deno 100 and verbal fluency for language; a serial digit learning test and the double task of Baddeley for working memory; Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) similarities for conceptual elaboration; and the Stroop test, the Trail Making test, and the WAIS digit symbol test for executive functions. The patients were followed at 6-month intervals for up to 3 years in order to identify those who converted to AD vs those who remained stable over time. Statistical analyses were based on receiver operating characteristic curve and Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 59 subjects converted to AD dementia. The most sensitive and specific test for diagnosis of prodromal AD was the FCSRT. Significant cutoff for the diagnosis was 17/48 for free recall, 40/48 for total recall, and below 71% for index of sensitivity of cueing (% of efficacy of semantic cues for retrieval). The amnestic syndrome of the medial temporal type, defined by the Free and Cued Selective Recall Reminding Test, is able to distinguish patients at an early stage of Alzheimer disease from mild cognitive impairment non-converters.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ADCOMS: a composite clinical outcome for prodromal Alzheimer's disease trials

              Background Development of new therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasingly focused on more mildly affected populations, and requires new assessment and outcome strategies. Patients in early stages of AD have mild cognitive decline and no, or limited, functional impairment. To respond to these assessment challenges, we developed a measurement approach based on established scale items that exhibited change in previous amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) trials. Methods Partial least squares regression with a longitudinal clinical decline model identified items from commonly used clinical scales with the highest combined sensitivity to change over time in aMCI and weighted these items according to their relative contribution to detecting clinical progression in patients’ early stages of AD. The resultant AD Composite Score (ADCOMS) was assessed for its ability to detect treatment effect in aMCI/prodromal AD (pAD) clinical trial populations. Results ADCOMS consists of 4 Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive subscale items, 2 Mini-Mental State Examination items, and all 6 Clinical Dementia Rating—Sum of Boxes items. ADCOMS demonstrated improved sensitivity to clinical decline over individual scales in pAD, aMCI and in mild AD dementia. ADCOMS also detected treatment effects associated with the use of cholinesterase inhibitors in these populations. Improved sensitivity predicts smaller sample size requirements when ADCOMS is used in early AD trials. Conclusions ADCOMS is proposed as new standard outcome for pAD and mild AD dementia trials, and is progressing in a CAMD-sponsored qualification process for use in registration trials of pAD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cumminj@ccf.org
                paisen@usc.edu
                bruno.dubois@aphp.fr
                Lutz.Froelich@zi-mannheim.de
                jack.clifford@mayo.edu
                R.W.Jones@bath.ac.uk
                morrisj@abraxas.wustl.edu
                raskin_joel@lilly.com
                dowsettsa@lilly.com
                p.scheltens@vumc.nl
                Journal
                Alzheimers Res Ther
                Alzheimers Res Ther
                Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
                BioMed Central (London )
                1758-9193
                20 September 2016
                20 September 2016
                2016
                : 8
                : 39
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV USA
                [2 ]University of Southern California, San Diego, CA USA
                [3 ]Institute for Memory and Alzheimer’s Disease (IM2A) and ICM, Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris University, Paris, France
                [4 ]Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
                [5 ]Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
                [6 ]The Research Institute for the Care of Older People (RICE), Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
                [7 ]Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO USA
                [8 ]Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN USA
                [9 ]Eli Lilly and Company, Toronto, Canada
                [10 ]Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
                Article
                207
                10.1186/s13195-016-0207-9
                5028936
                27646601
                1ba848a5-6acc-4b73-a06a-b77e967b6df2
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Neurology
                alzheimer’s disease,disease-modifying therapy,2025
                Neurology
                alzheimer’s disease, disease-modifying therapy, 2025

                Comments

                Comment on this article