Socioeconomic Disparities in Optimism and Pessimism

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) exhibits a graded relationship with health. Dispositional optimism represents a potential mediator and has been strongly linked to health, but few studies have assessed its association with SES. To assess the relationship between SES and trait optimism and pessimism in a representative community sample of older British adults. Community samples of adults (55-64 years) from Scotland (N = 10,650) and England (N = 5,099) registered with Primary Care Practices were mailed self-report questionnaires. Optimism was measured by the Life Orientation Test (LOT), which generates a total score and positive (optimism) and negative (pessimism) subscale scores. SES was assessed with an individual-level index of socioeconomic deprivation based on education, housing tenure, and car ownership. In both samples, there was a strong SES gradient in the total LOT score, with higher SES being associated with higher scores. However, when pessimism and optimism subscales were analyzed separately, the gradient was strong for pessimism, but minimal for optimism. The results suggest that lower SES is associated with viewing the future as containing more negative events, but there was little SES difference for positive events. It will be important to distinguish the roles of pessimism and optimism in other determinants of health.

Related collections

Most cited references 45

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.

Michael F Scheier, Charles S. Carver (1985)

0 comments Cited 784 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study

M.G. Marmot, S. Stansfeld, Keshav C. Patel … (1991)

The Whitehall study of British civil servants begun in 1967, showed a steep inverse association between social class, as assessed by grade of employment, and mortality from a wide range of diseases. Between 1985 and 1988 we investigated the degree and causes of the social gradient in morbidity in a new cohort of 10,314 civil servants (6900 men, 3414 women) aged 35-55 (the Whitehall II study). Participants were asked to answer a self-administered questionnaire and attend a screening examination. In the 20 years separating the two studies there has been no diminution in social class difference in morbidity: we found an inverse association between employment grade and prevalence of angina, electrocardiogram evidence of ischaemia, and symptoms of chronic bronchitis. Self-perceived health status and symptoms were worse in subjects in lower status jobs. There were clear employment-grade differences in health-risk behaviours including smoking, diet, and exercise, in economic circumstances, in possible effects of early-life environment as reflected by height, in social circumstances at work (eg, monotonous work characterised by low control and low satisfaction), and in social supports. Healthy behaviours should be encouraged across the whole of society; more attention should be paid to the social environments, job design, and the consequences of income inequality.