53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      EBs Recognize a Nucleotide-Dependent Structural Cap at Growing Microtubule Ends

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Growing microtubule ends serve as transient binding platforms for essential proteins that regulate microtubule dynamics and their interactions with cellular substructures. End-binding proteins (EBs) autonomously recognize an extended region at growing microtubule ends with unknown structural characteristics and then recruit other factors to the dynamic end structure. Using cryo-electron microscopy, subnanometer single-particle reconstruction, and fluorescence imaging, we present a pseudoatomic model of how the calponin homology (CH) domain of the fission yeast EB Mal3 binds to the end regions of growing microtubules. The Mal3 CH domain bridges protofilaments except at the microtubule seam. By binding close to the exchangeable GTP-binding site, the CH domain is ideally positioned to sense the microtubule's nucleotide state. The same microtubule-end region is also a stabilizing structural cap protecting the microtubule from depolymerization. This insight supports a common structural link between two important biological phenomena, microtubule dynamic instability and end tracking.

          Abstract

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          ► End-binding protein (EB) Mal3 bridges microtubule protofilaments except at the seam ► Mal3 binds next to the tubulin GTPase site and is positioned to sense GTP hydrolysis ► EBs recognize a stabilizing structural cap at growing microtubule ends ► EB end tracking and dynamic instability are mechanistically linked

          Abstract

          Subnanometer reconstruction of a microtubule end-binding protein (EB) in complex with microtubules reveals interactions with the GTP cap that protects the growing end from depolymerization. The results suggest a mechanism for how EBs track dynamic changes in filament length and provide a moving platform for recruiting regulatory proteins.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dynamic instability of microtubule growth.

          We report here that microtubules in vitro coexist in growing and shrinking populations which interconvert rather infrequently. This dynamic instability is a general property of microtubules and may be fundamental in explaining cellular microtubule organization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An EB1-binding motif acts as a microtubule tip localization signal.

            Microtubules are filamentous polymers essential for cell viability. Microtubule plus-end tracking proteins (+TIPs) associate with growing microtubule plus ends and control microtubule dynamics and interactions with different cellular structures during cell division, migration, and morphogenesis. EB1 and its homologs are highly conserved proteins that play an important role in the targeting of +TIPs to microtubule ends, but the underlying molecular mechanism remains elusive. By using live cell experiments and in vitro reconstitution assays, we demonstrate that a short polypeptide motif, Ser-x-Ile-Pro (SxIP), is used by numerous +TIPs, including the tumor suppressor APC, the transmembrane protein STIM1, and the kinesin MCAK, for localization to microtubule tips in an EB1-dependent manner. Structural and biochemical data reveal the molecular basis of the EB1-SxIP interaction and explain its negative regulation by phosphorylation. Our findings establish a general "microtubule tip localization signal" (MtLS) and delineate a unifying mechanism for this subcellular protein targeting process.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reconstitution of a microtubule plus-end tracking system in vitro.

              The microtubule cytoskeleton is essential to cell morphogenesis. Growing microtubule plus ends have emerged as dynamic regulatory sites in which specialized proteins, called plus-end-binding proteins (+TIPs), bind and regulate the proper functioning of microtubules. However, the molecular mechanism of plus-end association by +TIPs and their ability to track the growing end are not well understood. Here we report the in vitro reconstitution of a minimal plus-end tracking system consisting of the three fission yeast proteins Mal3, Tip1 and the kinesin Tea2. Using time-lapse total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, we show that the EB1 homologue Mal3 has an enhanced affinity for growing microtubule end structures as opposed to the microtubule lattice. This allows it to track growing microtubule ends autonomously by an end recognition mechanism. In addition, Mal3 acts as a factor that mediates loading of the processive motor Tea2 and its cargo, the Clip170 homologue Tip1, onto the microtubule lattice. The interaction of all three proteins is required for the selective tracking of growing microtubule plus ends by both Tea2 and Tip1. Our results dissect the collective interactions of the constituents of this plus-end tracking system and show how these interactions lead to the emergence of its dynamic behaviour. We expect that such in vitro reconstitutions will also be essential for the mechanistic dissection of other plus-end tracking systems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell Press
                0092-8674
                1097-4172
                13 April 2012
                13 April 2012
                : 149
                : 2-2
                : 371-382
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, Lincoln's Inn Fields Laboratories, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, UK
                [2 ]Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7HX, UK
                [3 ]European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author c.moores@ 123456mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author thomas.surrey@ 123456cancer.org.uk
                [4]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                CELL6189
                10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.049
                3368265
                22500803
                1bee7d38-c4c9-47ee-9263-edaf2071d2bd
                © 2012 ELL & Excerpta Medica.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 5 October 2011
                : 19 December 2011
                : 10 February 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article