11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Advanced analytical methodologies for measuring healthy ageing and its determinants, using factor analysis and machine learning techniques: the ATHLOS project

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A most challenging task for scientists that are involved in the study of ageing is the development of a measure to quantify health status across populations and over time. In the present study, a Bayesian multilevel Item Response Theory approach is used to create a health score that can be compared across different waves in a longitudinal study, using anchor items and items that vary across waves. The same approach can be applied to compare health scores across different longitudinal studies, using items that vary across studies. Data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) are employed. Mixed-effects multilevel regression and Machine Learning methods were used to identify relationships between socio-demographics and the health score created. The metric of health was created for 17,886 subjects (54.6% of women) participating in at least one of the first six ELSA waves and correlated well with already known conditions that affect health. Future efforts will implement this approach in a harmonised data set comprising several longitudinal studies of ageing. This will enable valid comparisons between clinical and community dwelling populations and help to generate norms that could be useful in day-to-day clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quantification of biological aging in young adults.

            Antiaging therapies show promise in model organism research. Translation to humans is needed to address the challenges of an aging global population. Interventions to slow human aging will need to be applied to still-young individuals. However, most human aging research examines older adults, many with chronic disease. As a result, little is known about aging in young humans. We studied aging in 954 young humans, the Dunedin Study birth cohort, tracking multiple biomarkers across three time points spanning their third and fourth decades of life. We developed and validated two methods by which aging can be measured in young adults, one cross-sectional and one longitudinal. Our longitudinal measure allows quantification of the pace of coordinated physiological deterioration across multiple organ systems (e.g., pulmonary, periodontal, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, and immune function). We applied these methods to assess biological aging in young humans who had not yet developed age-related diseases. Young individuals of the same chronological age varied in their "biological aging" (declining integrity of multiple organ systems). Already, before midlife, individuals who were aging more rapidly were less physically able, showed cognitive decline and brain aging, self-reported worse health, and looked older. Measured biological aging in young adults can be used to identify causes of aging and evaluate rejuvenation therapies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age?

              Biological age (BA) is useful for examining differences in aging rates. Nevertheless, little consensus exists regarding optimal methods for calculating BA. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive ability of five BA algorithms. The sample included 9,389 persons, aged 30-75 years, from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. During the 18-year follow-up, 1,843 deaths were counted. Each BA algorithm was compared with chronological age on the basis of predictive sensitivity and strength of association with mortality. Results found that the Klemera and Doubal method was the most reliable predictor of mortality and performed significantly better than chronological age. Furthermore, when included with chronological age in a model, Klemera and Doubal method had more robust predictive ability and caused chronological age to no longer be significantly associated with mortality. Given the potential of BA to highlight heterogeneity, the Klemera and Doubal method algorithm may be useful for studying a number of questions regarding the biology of aging.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group
                2045-2322
                10 March 2017
                2017
                : 7
                : 43955
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid , Madrid, Spain
                [2 ]CIBER of Mental Health , Spain
                [3 ]Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP) , Madrid, Spain
                [4 ]Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University , Athens, Greece
                [5 ]The Centre for Applied Genomics, Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ]Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu , Barcelona, Spain
                [7 ]CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health , Spain
                [8 ]SPRING TECHNO GMBH & Co. KG , Bremen, Germany
                [9 ]Information, Evidence and Research, World Health Organization , Geneva, Switzerland
                Author notes
                Article
                srep43955
                10.1038/srep43955
                5345043
                28281663
                1c0af3b1-7c3b-4fb9-885b-fa8309965d79
                Copyright © 2017, The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 31 October 2016
                : 01 February 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article