13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Multicenter Study of Patient-Reported Infectious and Noninfectious Complications Associated With Indwelling Urethral Catheters

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          From a patient’s perspective, how common are infectious and noninfectious indwelling urethral catheter–associated complications?

          Findings

          In this multicenter cohort study of 2076 adults with an indwelling urethral catheter, 57% of patients reported at least 1 complication because of the catheter, and noninfectious complications (55%) were 5 times as common as infectious complications (11%). Women were significantly more likely to report infectious complications, whereas men reported a significantly higher frequency of noninfectious complications.

          Meaning

          Noninfectious complications involving urethral catheters are common; in addition to avoiding urethral catheterization, patient safety efforts should focus on reducing the noninfectious harms of urethral catheters.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Indwelling urethral catheters (ie, Foley catheters) are important in caring for certain hospitalized patients but can also cause complications in patients.

          Objective

          To determine the incidence of infectious and noninfectious patient-reported complications associated with the indwelling urethral catheter.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          A prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with placement of a new indwelling urethral catheter while hospitalized at 1 of 4 US hospitals in 2 states. The study was conducted from August 26, 2015, to August 18, 2017. Participants were evaluated at baseline and contacted at 14 days and 30 days after insertion of the catheter about complications associated with the indwelling urethral catheter and how catheterization affected their social activities or activities of daily living.

          Exposures

          Indwelling urethral catheter placement during hospitalization. Patients were enrolled within 3 days of catheter insertion and followed up for 30 days after catheter placement, whether the catheter remained in or was removed from the patient.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Infectious and noninfectious complications associated with an indwelling urethral catheter as well as how the catheter affected patient social activities or activities of daily living.

          Results

          Of 2967 eligible patients, 2227 (75.1%) agreed to participate at 1 of 4 study sites; 2076 total patients were evaluated. Of these, 71.4% were male; mean (SD) age was 60.8 (13.4) years. Most patients (1653 of 2076 [79.6%]) had short-term catheters placed for surgical procedures. During the 30 days after urethral catheter insertion, 1184 of 2076 patients (57.0%; 95% CI, 54.9%-59.2%) reported at least 1 complication due to the indwelling urethral catheter. Infectious complications were reported by 219 of 2076 patients (10.5%; 95% CI, 9.3%-12.0%), whereas noninfectious complications (eg, pain or discomfort, blood in the urine, or sense of urinary urgency) occurred in 1150 patients (55.4%; 95% CI, 53.2%-57.6%) ( P < .001). Women were more likely to report an infectious complication (92 of 594 [15.5%] women vs 127 of 1482 [8.6%] men; P < .001), while men were more likely to report a noninfectious complication (869 of 1482 [58.6%] men vs 281 of 594 [47.3%] women; P < .001). Restrictions in activities of daily living (49 of 124 patients [39.5%]) or social activity (54 of 124 [43.9%]) were commonly reported by the patients who had catheters still in place; sexual problems were reported by 99 of 2034 patients (4.9%) after their catheter was removed.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Noninfectious complications of urethral catheters affect a substantial number of patients, underscoring the importance of avoiding urethral catheterization whenever possible. Given the high incidence of these patient-reported complications, urethral catheter–associated noninfectious complications should be a focus of surveillance and prevention efforts.

          Abstract

          This multicenter cohort study examines infectious and noninfectious complications reported by patients up to a month after receiving an indwelling urethral catheter.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria.

            Indwelling catheters are strongly associated with the development of bacteriuria, which can lead to significant morbidity in hospitalized patients. This report, a review of the literature, evaluates the infectious outcomes of patients with indwelling catheters to determine the precise clinical and economic impact of catheter-related infection. Statistical pooling was used to estimate the incidence of bacteriuria in hospitalized patients with indwelling catheters. In addition, the proportion of patients with catheter-related bacteriuria in whom symptomatic urinary tract infection and bacteremia will develop was estimated through quantitative synthesis of previous reports. Costs were estimated by using microcosting techniques. Of patients who have indwelling catheters for 2 to 10 days, bacteriuria is expected to develop in 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23% to 29%). Among patients with bacteriuria symptoms of urinary tract infection will develop in 24%, (95% CI, 16% to 32%), and bacteremia from a urinary tract source will develop in 3.6% (95% CI, 3.4% to 3.8%). Each episode of symptomatic urinary tract infection is expected to cost an additional $676, and catheter-related bacteremia is likely to cost at least $2836. Given the clinical and economic burden of urinary catheter-related infection, infection control professionals and hospital epidemiologists should use the latest infection control principles and technology to reduce this common complication.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters.

              Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is the most common nosocomial infection. Each year, more than 1 million patients in U.S. acute-care hospitals and extended-care facilities acquire such an infection; the risk with short-term catheterization is 5% per day. CAUTI is the second most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infection, and studies suggest that patients with CAUTI have an increased institutional death rate, unrelated to the development of urosepsis. Novel urinary catheters impregnated with nitrofurazone or minocycline and rifampin or coated with a silver alloy-hydrogel exhibit antiinfective surface activity that significantly reduces the risk of CAUTI for short-term catheterizations not exceeding 2-3 weeks.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Internal Medicine
                American Medical Association
                2168-6106
                2168-6114
                2 July 2018
                August 2018
                2 July 2018
                : 178
                : 8
                : 1078-1085
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
                [2 ]Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
                [3 ]Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor
                [4 ]Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
                [5 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
                [6 ]Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: April 16, 2018.
                Published Online: July 2, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2417
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2018 Saint S et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.
                Corresponding Author: Sanjay Saint, MD, MPH, Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Bldg 16, Room 430W, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800 ( saint@ 123456med.umich.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Mr Ratz and Dr Krein had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Saint, Trautner, Hollingsworth, Krein.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Saint, Fowler, Colozzi, Ratz, Lescinskas, Hollingsworth, Krein.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Saint, Fowler, Colozzi, Ratz.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Saint, Trautner, Lescinskas, Hollingsworth, Krein.
                Statistical analysis: Ratz.
                Obtained funding: Saint, Krein.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Fowler, Colozzi, Lescinskas.
                Supervision: Saint.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Saint reported serving on the medical advisory board for Doximity (a social networking site for physicians), and on the scientific advisory board of Jvion, a health care technology company. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support : This work was supported by grants IIR 12-395 (Drs Saint and Krein) and RCS 11-222 (Dr Krein) from the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organization had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
                Additional Contributions: We thank the following individuals for their assistance in data collection for the study and who all received financial compensation for their work on this project as part of their employment: Laura Dillon, BS (Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center); Jeanaya McKinley, MPA, and Laura Peña, MPH (Baylor College of Medicine); Jason Mann, MSA, Suzanne Winter, MS, and Kathy Swalwell, BSW (University of Michigan); and Marylena Rouse, LBSW, Jane Wong, MPH, and Debbie Zawol, MSN, RN (Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System).
                Article
                ioi180036
                10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2417
                6143107
                29971436
                1c5ad62a-cf2e-450d-96b5-0afa94078311
                Copyright 2018 Saint S et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 7 March 2018
                : 9 April 2018
                : 16 April 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content965

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors259