9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Propensity for Clinically Meaningful Improvement and Surgical Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) confers an alternative to ACL reconstruction in appropriately selected patients.

          Purpose:

          To prospectively assess survivorship and to define the clinically meaningful outcomes after ACL repair.

          Study Design:

          Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

          Methods:

          Included were consecutive patients with Sherman grade 1-2 tears who underwent primary ACL repair with or without suture augmentation between 2017 and 2019. Patient-reported outcomes (Lysholm, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] subscales) were collected preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using a distribution-based method, whereas the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were calculated using an anchor-based method. Plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were obtained at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

          Results:

          A total of 120 patients were included. The overall failure rate was 11.3% at 2 years postoperatively. Changes in outcome scores required to achieve the MCID ranged between 5.1 and 14.3 at 6 months, 4.6 and 8.4 at 1 year, and 4.7 and 11.9 at 2 years postoperatively. Thresholds for PASS achievement ranged between 62.5 and 89 at 6 months, 75 and 89 at 1 year, and 78.6 and 93.2 at 2 years postoperatively. Threshold scores (absolute/change based) for achieving the SCB ranged between 82.8 and 96.4/17.7 and 40.1 at 6 months, between 94.7 and 100/23 and 45 at 1 year, and between 95.3 and 100/29.4 and 45 at 2 years. More patients achieved the MCID and PASS at 1 year compared with 6 months and 2 years. For SCB, this trend was also observed for non-KOOS outcomes, while for KOOS subdomains, more patients achieved the SCB at 2 years. High-intensity signal of the ACL repair (odds ratio [OR], 31.7 [95% CI, 1.5-73.4]; P = .030) and bone contusions on MRI (OR, 4.2 [95% CI, 1.7-25.2]; P = .041) at 1 year postoperatively were independently associated with increased risk of ACL repair failure.

          Conclusion:

          The rate of clinically meaningful outcome improvement was high early after ACL repair, with the greatest proportion of patients achieving the MCID, PASS, and SCB at 1 year postoperatively. Bone contusions involving the posterolateral tibia and lateral femoral condyle as well as high repair signal intensity at 1 year postoperatively were independent predictors of failure at 2 years postoperatively.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Index for rating diagnostic tests

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.

              Bone-patellar tendon-bone (bone-tendon-bone) and four-strand hamstring tendon grafts (hamstring) are the most commonly utilized autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Existing clinical trials, registry studies, and meta-analyses offer conflicting opinions regarding the most favorable graft choice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Orthop J Sports Med
                Orthop J Sports Med
                OJS
                spojs
                Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2325-9671
                12 April 2023
                April 2023
                : 11
                : 4
                : 23259671221146815
                Affiliations
                [* ]Centro Artroscópico Jorge Batista SA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
                []Centro de Tratamiento de Enfermedades Articulares, Buenoa Aires, Argentina.
                []Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
                [§ ]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
                [5-23259671221146815] Investigation performed at the Centro Artroscópico Jorge Batista SA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                Author notes
                [*] []Kyle N. Kunze, M.D, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA (email: kylekunze7@ 123456gmail.com ) (Twitter: @kylekunzemd).
                Article
                10.1177_23259671221146815
                10.1177/23259671221146815
                10102942
                1c60a0ed-4ea5-4650-b884-e3b633387582
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 3 September 2022
                : 11 October 2022
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ts3

                acl,clinical outcomes,mcid,pass,repair,scb
                acl, clinical outcomes, mcid, pass, repair, scb

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content207

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors424