21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      First-in-human intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging of glioblastoma using cetuximab-IRDye800

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Maximizing extent of surgical resection with the least morbidity remains critical for survival in glioblastoma patients, and we hypothesize that it can be improved by enhancements in intraoperative tumor detection. In a clinical study, we determined if therapeutic antibodies could be repurposed for intraoperative imaging during resection.

          Methods

          Fluorescently labeled cetuximab-IRDye800 was systemically administered to three patients 2 days prior to surgery. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of tumor and histologically negative peri-tumoral tissue was performed intraoperatively and ex vivo. Fluorescence was measured as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) were calculated by comparing MFIs of tumor and histologically uninvolved tissue.

          Results

          The mean TBR was significantly higher in tumor tissue of contrast-enhancing (CE) tumors on preoperative imaging (4.0 ± 0.5) compared to non-CE tumors (1.2 ± 0.3; p = 0.02). The TBR was higher at a 100 mg dose than at 50 mg (4.3 vs. 3.6). The smallest detectable tumor volume in a closed-field setting was 70 mg with 50 mg of dye and 10 mg with 100 mg. On sections of paraffin embedded tissues, fluorescence positively correlated with histological evidence of tumor. Sensitivity and specificity of tumor fluorescence for viable tumor detection was calculated and fluorescence was found to be highly sensitive (73.0% for 50 mg dose, 98.2% for 100 mg dose) and specific (66.3% for 50 mg dose, 69.8% for 100 mg dose) for viable tumor tissue in CE tumors while normal peri-tumoral tissue showed minimal fluorescence.

          Conclusion

          This first-in-human study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of antibody based imaging for CE glioblastomas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prognostic effect of epidermal growth factor receptor and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

          The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in approximately 50% to 60% of glioblastoma multiforme tumors, and the most common EGFR mutant, EGFRvIII, is expressed in 24% to 67% of cases. We sought to determine whether glioblastoma multiforme expression of either overexpressed wild-type EGFR or the mutant EGFRvIII is an independent predictor of overall patient survival. Glioblastoma multiforme patients (n = 196) underwent a > or =95% volumetric tumor resection followed by conformal radiation. Their EGFR and EGFRvIII status was determined by immunohistochemistry and survival analyses were done. In our study of glioblastoma multiforme patients, 46% (n = 91) failed to express EGFR, 54% (n = 105) had overexpression of the wild-type EGFR, and 31% (n = 61) also expressed the EGFRvIII. Patients within groups expressing the EGFR, EGFRvIII, or lacking EGFR expression did not differ in age, sex, Karnofsky performance scale score, extent of tumor resection, or radiation. The median overall survival times for patients with tumors having EGFR expression absent, overexpressed only, or mutant (EGFRvIII) were 0.96, 0.98, and 1.07 years, respectively. However, for patients surviving > or =1 year, these values were 2.03, 2.02, and 1.21 years (P or =1 year, the expression of EGFRvIII was an independent negative prognostic indicator.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Residual tumor volume versus extent of resection: predictors of survival after surgery for glioblastoma.

            The impact of extent of resection (EOR) on survival for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) continues to be a point of debate despite multiple studies demonstrating that increasing EOR likely extends survival for these patients. In addition, contrast-enhancing residual tumor volume (CE-RTV) alone has rarely been analyzed quantitatively to determine if it is a predictor of outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of CE-RTV and T2/FLAIR residual volume (T2/F-RV) on overall survival.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study.

              The presence of contrast enhancement in a brain tumor is often regarded as a sign of malignancy. The authors identified 314 patients with malignant and low-grade supratentorial glial neoplasms in an unselected population, 58 of which lacked contrast enhancement on preoperative neuroimaging. Nonenhancing gliomas were malignant in approximately one third of cases, especially in older patients. Histologic confirmation of the diagnosis is therefore important in all patients suspected of harboring a primary glial neoplasm.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                8309335
                5024
                J Neurooncol
                J. Neurooncol.
                Journal of neuro-oncology
                0167-594X
                1573-7373
                10 May 2018
                06 April 2018
                August 2018
                01 August 2018
                : 139
                : 1
                : 135-143
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University, Stanford, USA
                [3 ]Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
                [6 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
                [7 ]Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA, USA
                Author notes

                Sarah E. Miller and Willemieke S. Tummers contributed equally to this article and share first authorship.

                Article
                NIHMS966226
                10.1007/s11060-018-2854-0
                6031450
                29623552
                1ca37538-2284-4b33-a706-a33c6e54164e

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                antibody-based imaging,cetuximab,brain neoplasms,fluorescence,glioblastoma,image-guided surgery,phase 1

                Comments

                Comment on this article