EVALUATION OF A COMMERCIAL STOOL CONCENTRATOR KIT COMPARED TO DIRECT SMEAR AND FORMALIN-ETHYL ACETATE CONCENTRATION METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF PARASITIC INFECTION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO OPISTHORCHIS VIVERRINI SENSU LATO IN THAILAND.

Abstract

Opisthorchiasis and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are major public health problems in Thailand and countries in the lower Mekong Subregion. Elimination of opisthorchiasis will be an important step toward the prevention, control and reduction of CCA. In order to achieve this goal, a sensitive and robust diagnostic method is required to identify people with current Opisthorchis viverrini sensu lato infection as the parasite is a group 1 carcinogen believed to be an etiology of CCA. To date, sensitive parasitological methods, such as formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) is preferred, but it is not practical in a remote primary care setting. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a commercial stool concentrator kit with that of a direct simple smear method and a modified FECT. In diagnosing parasite infection and opisthorchiasis, the commercial kit had greater sensitivity (43.8-58.5%) than direct smear method (12.5-31.7%), but was less sensitive than FECT (73.2-75%). In a separate sample population, similar results were obtained when comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the commercial kit and FECT. However, the commercial kit was more effective in a field setting than FECT, and had better accuracy than direct smear method, which suggests that the kit could have potential utility in epidemiological studies and control programs of opisthorchiasis, as well as other parasitic infections. The design of the self-contained one-tube kit plus its long storage time after sample preparation provides a considerable advantage over other methods, such as direct or Kato thick smear method, under similar field conditions.