3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The educational environment is critical to learning and is determined by social interactions. Trainee satisfaction translates to career commitment, retention and a positive professional attitude as well as being an important factor in assessing the impact of the training program. This study aimed to validate the Scan of Postgraduate Educational Environment Domain (SPEED) tool and assess its appropriateness in evaluating the quality of General Practice (GP) rural postgraduate educational environment.

          Methods

          A questionnaire containing the 15-item SPEED tool was administered to GP registrars to examine their perceptions of the educational environment. Principal component analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to gather evidences of the validity of the instrument based on its internal structure. Additional validity evidence and reliability estimates were obtained using many-facet Rasch model analysis (MFRM).

          Results

          The survey was completed by 351 registrars with a response rate of 60%. Parallel analysis performed using principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis suggests that the SPEED tool is unidimensional. The MFRM analysis demonstrated an excellent degree of infit and outfit for items and training sites, but not for persons. The MFRM analysis also estimated high reliability levels for items (0.98), training sites (0.95) and persons within training sites (ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 in each training sites). Overall, the registrars agreed that the educational environment had high quality, with most (13 out of 15) of the items rated above 4 out of 5.

          Conclusions

          This study demonstrated a high degree of validity and reliability of the SPEED tool for the measurement of the quality of the educational environment in a rural postgraduate GP training context. However, when applied in a new setting, the tool may not function as a multidimensional tool consistent with its theoretical grounding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Little Jiffy, Mark Iv

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective.

            J Genn (2001)
            This paper looks at five focal terms in education - curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change - and the interrelationships and dynamics between and among them. It emphasizes the power and utility of the concept of climate as an operationalization or manifestation of the curriculum and the other three concepts. Ideas pertaining to the theory of climate and its measurement can provide a greater understanding of the medical curriculum. The learning environment is an important determinant of behaviour. Environment is perceived by students and it is perceptions of environment that are related to behaviour. The environment, as perceived, may be designated as climate. It is argued that the climate is the soul and spirit of the medical school environment and curriculum. Students' experiences of the climate of their medical education environment are related to their achievements, satisfaction and success. Measures of educational climate are reviewed and climate measures for medical education are discussed. These should take account of current trends in medical education and curricula. Measures of the climate may subdivide it into different components giving, for example, a separate assessment of so-called Faculty Press, Student Press, Administration Press and Physical or Material Environmental Press. Climate measures can be used in different modes with the same stakeholders. For example, students may be asked to report, first, their perceptions of the actual environment they have experienced and, second, to report on their ideal or preferred environment. The same climate index can be used with different stakeholders giving, for example, staff and student comparisons. In addition to the educational climate of the environment that students inhabit, it is important to consider the organizational climate of the work environment that staff inhabit. This organizational climate is very significant, not only for staff, but for their students, too. The medical school is a learning organization evolving and changing in the illuminative evaluation it makes of its environment and its curriculum through the action research studies of its climate. Considerations of climate in the medical school, along the lines of continuous quality improvement and innovation, are likely to further the medical school as a learning organization with the attendant benefits. Unless medical schools become such learning organizations, their quality of health and their longevity may be threatened.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bunmi.malauaduli@jcu.edu.au
                faith.alele@jcu.edu.au
                c.collares@maastrichtuniversity.nl
                carole.reeve@jcu.edu.au
                c.vandervleuten@maastrichtuniversity.nl
                marcy.holdsworth@jcu.edu.au
                paula.heggarty1@jcu.edu.au
                peta.teague@jcu.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                17 January 2019
                17 January 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 25
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0474 1797, GRID grid.1011.1, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, ; QLD, Townsville, Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0481 6099, GRID grid.5012.6, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, ; Maastricht, Netherlands
                [3 ]European Board of Medical Assessors, Maastricht, Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6054-8498
                Article
                1455
                10.1186/s12909-019-1455-8
                6337755
                30654772
                1cd9d6e8-4b92-40d4-9b69-2e0f927f8d11
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 22 October 2018
                : 4 January 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Education
                quality of educational environment,gp registrars,rural postgraduate gp training
                Education
                quality of educational environment, gp registrars, rural postgraduate gp training

                Comments

                Comment on this article