18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematic review with meta‐analysis: rifaximin is effective and safe for the treatment of small intestine bacterial overgrowth

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth ( SIBO) is a heterogeneous syndrome, characterised by an increased number and/or abnormal type of bacteria in the small bowel. Over the past decades, rifaximin has gained popularity for this indication despite its use is not evidence based.

          Aim

          To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to summarise evidence about the efficacy and safety of rifaximin to eradicate SIBO in adult patients.

          Methods

          MEDLINE, EMBASE, CCRCT, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 16, 2015 for RCTs and observational studies. Furthermore, abstract books of major European, American and Asian gastroenterological meetings were also examined.

          Results

          Thirty‐two studies involving 1331 patients were included. The overall eradication rate according to intention‐to‐treat analysis was 70.8% (95% CI: 61.4–78.2; I 2 = 89.4%) and to per protocol analysis 72.9% (95% CI: 65.5–79.8; I 2 = 87.5%). Meta‐regression identified three covariates (drug dose, study design and co‐therapy) independently associated with an increased eradication rate. The overall rate of adverse events was 4.6% (95% CI: 2.3–7.5; I 2 = 63.6%). In the subset of studies (n= 10) allowing the analysis, improvement or resolution of symptoms in patients with eradicated SIBO was found to be 67.7% (95% CI: 44.7–86.9; I 2 = 91.3%).

          Conclusions

          Rifaximin treatment seems to be effective and safe for the treatment of SIBO. However, the quality of the available studies is generally poor. Well‐designed RCTs are needed to substantiate these findings and to establish the optimal regimen.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs

          New England Journal of Medicine, 342(25), 1887-1892
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of antimicrobial agents on the ecological balance of human microflora.

              The normal microflora acts as a barrier against colonisation of potentially pathogenic microorganisms and against overgrowth of already present opportunistic microorganisms. Control of growth of opportunistic microorganisms is termed colonisation resistance. Administration of antimicrobial agents, therapeutically or as prophylaxis, causes disturbances in the ecological balance between the host and the normal microflora. Most studies on the impact of antimicrobial agents on normal microflora have been carried out on the intestinal flora. Less is known on the effects on oropharyngeal, skin, and vaginal microflora. Disturbances in the microflora depend on the properties of the agents as well as of the absorption, route of elimination, and possible enzymatic inactivation and/or binding to faecal material of the agents. The clinically most common disturbances in the intestinal microflora are diarrhoea and fungal infections that usually cease after the end of treatment. A well-balanced microflora prevents establishment of resistant microbial strains. By using antimicrobial agents that do not disturb colonisation resistance, the risk of emergence and spread of resistant strains between patients and dissemination of resistant determinants between microorganisms is reduced. In this article, the potential ecological effects of administration of antimicrobial agents on the intestinal, oropharyngeal, and vaginal microflora are summarised. The review is based on clinical studies published during the past 10 years.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                gattalg@gmail.com
                Journal
                Aliment Pharmacol Ther
                Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2036
                APT
                Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0269-2813
                1365-2036
                12 January 2017
                March 2017
                : 45
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/apt.2017.45.issue-5 )
                : 604-616
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Clinical Pharmacology and Digestive Pathophysiology Unit Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of Parma ParmaItaly
                [ 2 ] Gastroenterology and Endoscopy UnitVersilia Hospital Azienda USL Toscana Nord‐Ovest Lido di CamaioreItaly
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to:

                Dr L. Gatta, Clinical Pharmacology and Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Maggiore University Hospital, University of Parma, Parma 43125, Italy.

                E‐mail: gattalg@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-3813
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-857X
                Article
                APT13928
                10.1111/apt.13928
                5299503
                28078798
                1cf022cb-46b5-466c-b28a-a0ba822c47f6
                © 2017 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 08 August 2016
                : 02 September 2016
                : 21 November 2016
                : 11 December 2016
                : 12 December 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 13, Words: 8537
                Categories
                Systematic Review with Meta‐analysis
                Systematic Reviews with Meta‐analyses
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                apt13928
                March 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.0.5 mode:remove_FC converted:09.02.2017

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article