Pre-treatment MDCT-based texture analysis for therapy response prediction in gastric cancer: Comparison with tumour regression grade at final histology

To prospectively evaluate accuracy of multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) images for preoperative staging of gastric cancer by using surgical and histopathologic results as reference standards. This study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was obtained from all patients. Multi-detector row CT included acquisition of virtual gastroscopy images after air distention and contrast material-enhanced dynamic transverse and multiplanar reformation (MPR) images after water distention. Fifty-five consecutive patients with gastric cancer (38 men, 17 women; age range, 37-84 years; mean age, 63 years) underwent preoperative CT. All received 6 g of gas-producing crystals before unenhanced CT scanning for gastric distention and virtual gastroscopy. Patients drank 800-1000 mL of tap water to establish a background for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scans. Images were obtained in late arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases with start delays of 40, 70, and 150 seconds, respectively. All patients underwent surgery. CT findings were compared with surgical and histopathologic results. Differences in accuracy of transverse and MPR images for T and N staging were assessed with the McNemar exact test. Statistical significance was inferred at P < .05. Detection rates of primary tumors with transverse images, MPRs, and combinations of MPR and virtual gastroscopy images were 91% (50 of 55), 96% (53 of 55), and 98% (54 of 55), respectively. Overall accuracy in assessment of tumor invasion of the gastric wall (T stage) was significantly better with MPR images (89% [49 of 55]) than with transverse images (73% [40 of 55]) (P < .01). Overall accuracy for lymph node (N) staging was 78% (43 of 55) with MPR images and 71% (39 of 55) with transverse images. This difference was not significant (P = .103). Multi-detector row CT with combined water and air distention can improve the accuracy of preoperative staging of gastric cancer. MPRs yield significantly better overall accuracy than transverse images for tumor staging but not for lymph node staging. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Validity of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) staging systems for gastric cancer has been evaluated in several studies, mostly in Asian patient populations. Only few data are available on the prognostic implications of the new classification system on a Western population. Therefore, we investigated its prognostic ability based on a German patient cohort. Data from a single-center cohort of 1,767 consecutive patients surgically treated for gastric cancer were classified according to the seventh edition and were compared using the previous TNM/UICC classification. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed for all TNM stages and UICC stages in a comparative manner. Additional survival receiver operating characteristic analyses and bootstrap-based goodness-of-fit comparisons via Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were performed to assess and compare prognostic performance of the competing classification systems. We identified the UICC pT/pN stages according to the seventh edition of the AJCC/UICC guidelines as well as resection status, age, Lauren histotype, lymph-node ratio, and tumor grade as independent prognostic factors in gastric cancer, which is consistent with data from previous Asian studies. Overall survival rates according to the new edition were significantly different for each individual's pT, pN, and UICC stage. However, BIC analysis revealed that, owing to higher complexity, the new staging system might not significantly alter predictability for overall survival compared with the old system within the analyzed cohort from a statistical point of view. The seventh edition of the AJCC/UICC classification was found to be valid with distinctive prognosis for each stage. However, the AJCC/UICC classification has become more complex without improving predictability for overall survival in a Western population. Therefore, simplification with better predictability of overall survival of patients with gastric cancer should be considered when revising the seventh edition.

Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) are known to have limitations in assessing the response of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) to chemotherapy.