4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in an Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patient without Removal of the PD Catheter: A Case Report

      case-report
      * ,
      Case Reports in Surgery
      Hindawi Publishing Corporation

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction. Laparotomy in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) is associated with an increased risk of morbidity. Furthermore, standard protocol recommends removal of the PD catheter when surgery on the intestine is required. As far as we are aware, this is the first case report of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in a patient on automated PD where the PD catheter was left in situ. Case Report. A 61-year-old man man on APD who presented with a caecal carcinoma was stabilised on temporary haemodialysis (HD) prior to undergoing a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy without removal of the PD catheter. He made an uneventful recovery and APD was resumed successfully 2 weeks after surgery. Discussion. PD patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery are at increased risk of complications. While the benefits of laparoscopic surgery in the standard surgical population are well established, there is limited experience of the technique in PD patients. Possible advantages could theoretically be early resumption of PD as well as less PD failure due to the formation of adhesions. Conclusion. Our experience with this case indicates that laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in a background of PD can be undertaken without removal of the PD catheter and is associated with early resumption of PD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates.

          Although kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment method for patients with ESRD, most patients are placed on dialysis either while awaiting transplantation or as their only therapy. The question of which dialytic method provides the best patient survival remains unresolved. Survival analyses comparing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis/continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CAPD/CCPD), a newer and less costly dialytic modality, have yielded conflicting results. Using data obtained from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we compared mortality rates between hemodialysis and CAPD/CCPD among 11,970 ESRD patients who initiated treatment between 1990 and 1994 and were followed-up for a maximum of 5 years. Factors controlled for include age, primary renal diagnosis, center size, and predialysis comorbid conditions. The mortality rate ratio (RR) for CAPD/CCPD relative to hemodialysis, as estimated by Poisson regression, was 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.78). No such relationship was found when an intent-to-treat Cox regression model was fit. Decreased covariable-adjusted mortality for CAPD/CCPD held within all subgroups defined by age and diabetes status, although the RRs increased with age and diabetes prevalence. The increased mortality on hemodialysis compared with CAPD/CCPD was concentrated in the first 2 years of follow-up. Although continuous peritoneal dialysis was associated with significantly lower mortality rates relative to hemodialysis after adjusting for known prognostic factors, the potential impact of unmeasured patient characteristics must be considered. Notwithstanding, we present evidence that CAPD/CCPD, a newer and less costly method of renal replacement therapy, is not associated with increased mortality rates relative to hemodialysis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A bacteriologically safe peritoneal access device.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality of life in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy.

              R Gokal (1993)
              Rehabilitation can be achieved by renal replacement therapy. The evidence to date would indicate that most successfully transplanted patients achieve rehabilitation both on objective and subjective criteria and in a cost effective manner; however, unsuccessful transplantation has a poor quality of life outcome. Some home dialysis patients achieve the same goals; these two groups comprise predominantly younger patients free of systemic disease. For the high risk group of patients which are predominantly managed by ICHD and CAPD, the objective evidence of rehabilitation is lacking; however, perceived quality of life on subjective measures shows results comparable to a normal population. Comparisons between ICHD and CAPD populations are difficult with different modality related stressors imparting stress to the patients. CAPD has marginal advantage over ICHD. Overall, from these studies, it seems that while successful transplantation imparts the best quality of life on both objective and subjective parameters, the differentiation between ICHD and CAPD is that much more difficult; what evidence there is would suggest that CAPD patients are marginally to moderately better rehabilitated, certainly on subjective parameters. The results in the studies suggest that patients with end-stage renal disease are able to adapt to very adverse life circumstances, nevertheless expressing considerable satisfaction with their lives.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Case Rep Surg
                Case Rep Surg
                CRIS
                Case Reports in Surgery
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2090-6900
                2090-6919
                2014
                8 July 2014
                : 2014
                : 492567
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery, St. James's Hospital, Borg Olivier Street, Sliema SLM 1807, Malta
                Author notes
                *Joseph A. Attard: joeatt87@ 123456gmail.com

                Academic Editor: Muthukumaran Rangarajan

                Article
                10.1155/2014/492567
                4119649
                1d0c5c9a-39f7-40d4-9861-3228786209c7
                Copyright © 2014 J. A. Attard and A. Attard.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 March 2014
                : 25 June 2014
                Categories
                Case Report

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article