51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 1
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Does being from a higher social class lead a person to engage in more or less prosocial behavior? Psychological research has recently provided support for a negative effect of social class on prosocial behavior. However, research outside the field of psychology has mainly found evidence for positive or u-shaped relations. In the present research, we therefore thoroughly examined the effect of social class on prosocial behavior. Moreover, we analyzed whether this effect was moderated by the kind of observed prosocial behavior, the observed country, and the measure of social class. Across eight studies with large and representative international samples, we predominantly found positive effects of social class on prosociality: Higher class individuals were more likely to make a charitable donation and contribute a higher percentage of their family income to charity (32,090 ≥ N ≥ 3,957; Studies 1–3), were more likely to volunteer (37,136 ≥ N ≥ 3,964; Studies 4–6), were more helpful ( N = 3,902; Study 7), and were more trusting and trustworthy in an economic game when interacting with a stranger ( N = 1,421; Study 8) than lower social class individuals. Although the effects of social class varied somewhat across the kinds of prosocial behavior, countries, and measures of social class, under no condition did we find the negative effect that would have been expected on the basis of previous results reported in the psychological literature. Possible explanations for this divergence and implications are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives.

          Current research on prosocial behavior covers a broad and diverse range of phenomena. We argue that this large research literature can be best organized and understood from a multilevel perspective. We identify three levels of analysis of prosocial behavior: (a) the "meso" level--the study of helper-recipient dyads in the context of a specific situation; (b) the micro level--the study of the origins of prosocial tendencies and the sources of variation in these tendencies; and (c) the macro level--the study of prosocial actions that occur within the context of groups and large organizations. We present research at each level and discuss similarities and differences across levels. Finally, we consider ways in which theory and research at these three levels of analysis might be combined in future intra- and interdisciplinary research on prosocial behavior.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being.

            The authors examined social class differences in 2 aspects of the sense of control (mastery and perceived constraints) in 3 national probability samples of men and women ages 25-75 years (N1 = 1,014; N2 = 1,195; N3 = 3,485). Participants with lower income had lower perceived mastery and higher perceived constraints, as well as poorer health. Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that for all income groups, higher perceived mastery and lower perceived constraints were related to better health, greater life satisfaction, and lower depressive symptoms. However, control beliefs played a moderating role; participants in the lowest income group with a high sense of control showed levels of health and well-being comparable with the higher income groups. The results provided some evidence that psychosocial variables such as sense of control may be useful in understanding social class differences in health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior.

              Lower social class (or socioeconomic status) is associated with fewer resources, greater exposure to threat, and a reduced sense of personal control. Given these life circumstances, one might expect lower class individuals to engage in less prosocial behavior, prioritizing self-interest over the welfare of others. The authors hypothesized, by contrast, that lower class individuals orient to the welfare of others as a means to adapt to their more hostile environments and that this orientation gives rise to greater prosocial behavior. Across 4 studies, lower class individuals proved to be more generous (Study 1), charitable (Study 2), trusting (Study 3), and helpful (Study 4) compared with their upper class counterparts. Mediator and moderator data showed that lower class individuals acted in a more prosocial fashion because of a greater commitment to egalitarian values and feelings of compassion. Implications for social class, prosocial behavior, and economic inequality are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                20 July 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 7
                : e0133193
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
                University of the Basque Country, SPAIN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Analyzed the data: MK BE SCS. Wrote the paper: MK BE SCS.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-48864
                10.1371/journal.pone.0133193
                4507988
                26193099
                1d234897-d430-418d-9a66-4b13eed52dde
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 5 November 2014
                : 23 June 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 8, Pages: 48
                Funding
                The authors acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the University of Leipzig within the program of Open Access Publishing.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All data necessary to replicate the findings for studies 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 are available as Supporting Information. Data from studies 1, 4 and 8 are available from the German SOEP project due to third party restrictions (for requests, please contact soepmail@ 123456diw.de ). Moreover, we provide the syntax we used for all our statistical analyses as Supporting Information.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article