Implications
Normal embryo development depends on many molecular events that include changes in
the chromatin structure, epigenetic modifications, DNA damage repair, expression of
transcription factors, and the coordination of cell cycle progression and cell differentiation.
Failures in the proper regulation of one or more events of early development may result
in embryo arrest, which often occurs around the oocyte to embryo transition when the
embryo genome is activated, or in embryos that may have lower potential for full development
and production of healthy offspring.
The complete elucidation of the early embryo programming regulation has effectual
implications on fertility, animal conservation, animal production, animal breeding
programs, the success of in vitro embryo technologies, and the reprogramming of cells
to a totipotent state.
Introduction
Normal embryo development is a critical component for normal fertility and is essential
for the propagation and survival of species, the success of animal breeding and production
programs, and the efficient use of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). The
embryo life begins at fertilization and its progress depends on a series of interplaying
events between the parental gametes. These events comprise the make-up and preservation
of the normal embryo ploidy, the remodeling of the chromatin inherited from each gamete
into a functional bi-paternal genome, and the coordination of the cell cycle progression,
cell function, and cell differentiation. There are many molecular events participating
in these processes, not only those involved in turning on and off the genes controlling
development, cell function, and differentiation, but also for the regulation of cell
homeostasis and the balance between cell survival and cell integrity. While cell survival
is essential for embryo development, cell integrity is essential for the health of
individuals and their progeny. It is known that a significant proportion of embryos
fail to develop and become arrested at early stages of development, before the first
cell lineage specification and blastocoel formation, particularly in embryos that
are cultured in vitro as part of ART protocols. The goal of this review paper is to
highlight some of the known mechanisms that participate in the regulation of the embryo
developmental program and its reprogramming.
Building and Preserving the Normal Embryo Program
Changes in the chromatin structure
Chromatin remodeling to support normal embryo development starts immediately after
fertilization. The sperm chromatin undergoes a vast rearrangement, which comprises
the replacement of protamines by histones. This is followed by DNA replication and
the merging of the paternal and maternal chromosomes, thus rebuilding a diploid bi-paternal
genome in the first mitotic division (Figure 1). The exchange of protamines by histones
involves the phosphorylation of protamines with the participation of the serine/arginine
protein kinase 1 (SRPK1), which enables the recruitment of the histone chaperones
Nucleoplasmin 2 (NPM2), involved in the extraction of protamines, and the histone
cell cycle regulator (HIRA), involved in H3.3 deposition (Gou et al., 2020). Replacement
of core and linker histone variants is also necessary for totipotency acquisition,
cell differentiation, and normal embryo development. For example, the three variants
of the core histone H2A, H2A.X, H2A.Z, and macroH2A, are present in the chromatin
of oocytes, but only the H2A.X variant is abundant in the pronuclei of zygotes after
fertilization (Nashun et al., 2010). The deposition of the H3.3 variant is important
for normal embryo development and chromatin stability (Gou et al., 2020).
Figure 1.
Chromatin modifications in the parental genomes during the first cell cycle. Differences
between the paternal and maternal genomes include: replacement of protamines by histones
in the paternal genome, active demethylation of DNA in the paternal genome vs. passive
demethylation in the maternal, higher H3K4me3 in the paternal genome, higher H3K9me2/3
and H3K27me2/3 in the maternal genome. This figure was assembled using Biorender.
Replacement of variants of the linker histone H1, which comprises 11 variants divided
into somatic and germline-specific subtypes, also alter the chromatin structure and
function during embryo programming. For example, the somatic variants are associated
with chromatin compaction and silencing of endogenous retroviruses via the establishment
of the repressive epigenetic marks H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, and the inhibition of the
permissive mark H3K36me2 (Willcockson et al., 2021). On the other hand, the oocyte-specific
variant, H1foo, is associated with chromatin relaxation and maintenance of cell pluripotency.
The H1foo is quickly assembled into the sperm chromatin after fertilization and remains
the most abundant H1 variant until the activation of the embryo genome when it is
replaced by the somatic variants.
In addition to the exchanges of nuclear proteins, the establishment of the embryo
developmental program depends on the activity of ATP-dependent nucleosome-remodeling
complexes, which modulate nucleosome spacing and access to transcription factors.
Among the different families of nucleosome-remodeling enzymes, the switch/sucrose
non-fermentable (SWI/SNF or BAF) complex plays important roles in the regulation of
early embryo development. Depletion or inactivation of components of the SWI/SNF complex,
including Brg1 (or SMARCA2), ARID1A, and SNF2H (or SMARCA5), hampered embryo genome
activation (EGA) and development. The expression of Brg1 around the EGA stage is correlated
with the developmental potential of embryos (Glanzner et al., 2017).
Epigenetic modifications and early embryo development
Early embryo programming depends on epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation
and post-translational modifications of histones. Epigenetic changes are necessary
for pronuclei formation, totipotency acquisition, oocyte-to-embryo transition, embryo
genome activation, and cell lineage specification and differentiation. Although the
paternal and maternal genomes are exposed to the same ooplasm environment, their epigenetic
status is asymmetrically regulated, and this epigenetic asymmetry persists for several
cell cycles. For example, while sperm DNA is rapidly and actively demethylated via
the recruitment of Tet enzymes, the oocyte DNA is passively demethylated during subsequent
cell cycles (Figure 1). DNA demethylation of both paternal and maternal genomes is
necessary to ensure the naïve state of the bi-parental genome and acquisition of cell
totipotency. The methyltransferases Ehmt2 and SETDB1, which regulate H3K9me2 and H3K9me3,
respectively, participate in protecting the maternal pronucleus from active DNA demethylation
(Zeng et al., 2019). In addition to DNA methylation, the paternal pronucleus has lower
levels of the repressive epigenetic marks H3K9me2/3 and H3K27me2/3 than the maternal
pronucleus. On the other hand, the paternal pronucleus has higher levels of the permissive
mark H3K4me3 compared to the maternal pronucleus (Figure 1). H3K4me3 levels fluctuate
during early embryo development and both the capacity to methylate and demethylate
H3K4 is necessary for EGA and normal embryo development. In pig embryos, attenuation
of the H3K4 demethylases, KDM5B and KDM5C, which are transiently expressed around
the EGA stage (Glanzner et al., 2018), affected EGA and DNA damage repair, and decreased
embryo development (Glanzner et al., 2020) (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Lysine demethylases (KDMs) are important regulators of the early embryo programming.
A) Examples of KDMs of lysine 4, 9 and 27 of the histone H3 that are transiently upregulated
around the embryo genome activation stage in bovine and porcine embryos. B) Consequences
of attenuating specific KDMs during early embryo development. This figure was assembled
using Biorender.
Normal embryo development also requires proper regulation of H3K36me3, which is a
permissive epigenetic mark that is commonly co-localized with RNA polymerase II in
gene bodies and regulate transcriptional elongation. Depletion of Setd2, a methyltransferase
of H3K36me3, led to aberrant DNA methylation, replacement of H3K36me3 by H3K4me3 and
H3K27me3 in gene sequences, abnormal H3K4me3 acquisition in imprinting sequences,
and abnormal oocyte maturation and embryo development (Xu et al., 2019).
Embryo programming is also regulated by the repressive epigenetic mark H3K27me. Although
H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 have opposite roles in transcriptional regulation, they co-exist
in some genes that require tight regulation, such as quick activation for cellular
differentiation. Following fertilization, H3K27me3 decreases in the promoter regions
of developmental genes, in both paternal and maternal alleles, however, maternal alleles
inherit distal H3K27me3, a difference that persists until the blastocyst stage (Zheng
et al., 2016). The decrease in H3K27me3 around the EGA stage may be necessary for
derepressing pluripotency genes, which are inactive during gametogenesis. Impaired
EGA and embryo development was observed in response to the attenuation of the H3K27me3
demethylase KDM6B (Chung et al., 2017). Attenuation of KDM7A, another H3K27me3 demethylase,
decreased embryo development and perturbed cell differentiation (Rissi et al., 2019)
(Figure 2).
Another repressive epigenetic mark having important impact on the regulation of the
early embryo program is H3K9me3. This epigenetic mark participates in the regulation
of long terminal repeats (LTR) and DNA damage repair, through the formation of a transitional
repressive heterochromatin, and it is important for the preservation of genome stability
in embryos. The function of Suv39h1/h2, which are methyltransferases of H3K9me3, is
necessary to maintain embryo genome stability (Peters et al., 2001). Attenuation of
KDM4C, a demethylase of H3K9me3, resulted in embryo developmental arrest at the morula
stage (Wang et al., 2010) (Figure 2).
Transcription factors and early embryo development
Changes in chromatin structure and epigenetic marks can either facilitate or restrict
the access of transcription factors (TFs) to regulatory elements of genes involved
in the coordination of early embryo development. There is evidence from studies with
bovine embryos indicating that open chromatin regions are enriched for maternal TFs
binding elements before EGA, while binding sites for homeobox TFs that regulate embryo
transcription become more common at the EGA stage (Halstead et al., 2020). Several
TFs involved in the EGA have been identified, which include the transcription intermediary
factor 1-α (TIF1α), the nuclear transcription factor Y (NFY), the DUX family (e.g.,
the mouse Dux and the human DUX4), the maternal factors developmental pluripotency-associated
2, 3 and 4 (Dppa2-3-4), which bind to the Dux promoter, and the Zinc finger and SCAN
domain-containing protein 4 (ZSCAN4). Depletion of TIF1α led to aberrant localization
of RNA polymerase II and embryo development arrest (Torres-Padilla and Zernicka-Goetz,
2006). Inactivation of either Dppa2 or Dppa3 reduced EGA transcripts and decreased
embryo development and quality (Eckersley-Maslin et al., 2019). In addition, Dppa2
and Dppa4 were shown to promote a permissive epigenetic pattern by preventing DNA
methylation and facilitating H3K4me3. ZSCAN4 is implicated in EGA through its interactions
with Dppa2, Dppa4, and Dux (Eckersley-Maslin et al., 2019). ZSCAN4 is also involved
in the regulation of DNA damage repair in embryos and its attenuation decreased blastocyst
formation (Takahashi et al., 2019; Srinivasan et al., 2020).
Ubiquitination and early embryo development
Normal embryo programming is also regulated by protein modifications induced by the
ubiquitin system. Ubiquitin is a small protein that binds to other proteins, which
is referred to as ubiquitination, and it modulates target proteins degradation, function,
or localization. The enzymes that drive the ubiquitination process are classified
as E1 or ubiquitin-activating enzymes, E2 or ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, and E3
or ubiquitin ligases. Another family of proteins with similar functions are the small
ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMO). Ubiquitination participates in the regulation of
several processes during early development such as fertilization, degradation of maternally
derived proteins during EGA transition, DNA damage repair, histone methylation, and
genomic imprinting. For example, the ubiquitin ligase NEDL2 is important for sperm
decondensation after fertilization (Mao et al., 2021). In addition, SUMO proteins
(e.g., SUMO-1, SUMO2) are involved in the regulation of development, epigenetic modifications,
expression of pluripotency-related genes, and genome stability in embryos (Liu et
al., 2020).
Transposable elements and early embryo development
Transposable elements (TEs) are also important regulators of cell functions during
early embryo development. TEs are mobile DNA sequences that can replicate and insert
in different sites of the genome and are grouped according to their mechanism of action
as retrotransposons or class I, and DNA transposons or class II. The class I TEs are
further classified, based on the presence or not of long terminal repeats (LTR) in
both extremities, as LTR or non-LTR. Retrotransposons play more relevant roles than
transposons on transcriptional regulation during embryo development. This includes
endogenous retrovirus (ERVs), which belong to the LTR group, and the long (LINEs)
and short (SINEs) interspersed nuclear elements, which belong to the non-LTR group.
ERVs are the most important TEs and are regulated by epigenetic changes (e.g., DNA
methylation, histone modifications), with the participation of DNA methyltransferases,
TET proteins, lysine methyltransferases, and lysine demethylases. ERVs affect gene
regulation by inserting into the genome near gene sequences and by using their LTRs
promoters to regulate transcription and alternative splicing. LINEs and SINEs also
participate in transcription regulation during embryo development and both account
for approximately 30% of the human genome (Elbarbary et al., 2016). TEs affect embryo
development by interacting with TFs and regulating gene expression and EGA (Fu et
al., 2019). Examples of TFs involved in EGA that are known to interact with TEs include
Dux, Dppa2, Dppa4, and Zscan4 (Hendrickson et al., 2017; Eckersley-Maslin et al.,
2019).
Genome damage/stability and early embryo development
Genome damage, repair, and stability are critical for normal embryo development. Genome
damage can be caused by endogenous and exogenous genotoxic factors, and may involve
DNA strand breaks, collapsed DNA replication forks, and damages to histones and other
DNA-binding proteins. To maintain genome stability, cells use complementary mechanisms
involving DNA damage sensors, DNA damage repair, DNA replication, and cell cycle checkpoints,
which may lead to cell recovery, cell adaption, or cell arrest/death. DNA damage repair
also involves replacement of histone variants, ubiquitination, and epigenetic modifications.
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most biologically significant genotoxic lesions
with potential severe effects on genomic stability and cell survival. Possible consequences
of DSBs include chromosome breakage and rearrangement, and mutagenesis, which may
have severe consequences for cell physiology and development. In this regard, DNA
mutations occurring at the beginning of embryonic life can be transmitted to tissues
and germs cells, and consequently passed on to the offspring. Early developing embryos
seem to repair DSBs by using mainly the homologous recombination (HR) pathway, which
is error-free, as opposed to the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway, which is
error-prone (Bohrer et al., 2018) (Figure 3). However, at earlier stages of development
embryos seems less capable of regulating cell cycle checkpoints, which may facilitate
the propagation of genetic errors. The incidence of DSBs was shown to alter embryo
cell cleave kinetics and reduce development to the blastocyst stage (Bohrer et al.,
2013). Oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress are associated with an increased
incidence of DSBs during early embryo development (Dicks et al., 2020) (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Genome damage affects embryo programming. Both environmental and endogenous factors
can cause DNA breaks. Double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are mainly repaired by the
homologous recombination pathway in early developing embryos, have more severe consequences
on embryo development and viability. If not repaired, DSBs may result in cell cycle
arrest, cell apoptosis and embryo death. This figure was assembled using Biorender.
Understanding the Early Embryo Program Through Its Reprogramming
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) into enucleated oocytes was the pioneering method
developed to investigate cell reprogramming. Lessons from SCNT studies pave the way
for the creation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS). More recently, a sub-population
of mouse totipotent cells resembling 2-cell stage embryos (2-cell like cells or 2-CLCs)
was identified, and along with SCNT are helping with deciphering the mechanisms regulating
early embryo development, cell totipotency, and differentiation. In SCNT, the embryo
genome originates from a differentiated cell, and is reprogrammed back to a totipotent
state, which enables examining embryo development mechanisms in a backward perspective.
Regarding the reprogramming of the chromatin structure, SCNT studies revealed that
extensive reprogramming of core (e.g., H2A, H2A.Z, H3.3) and linker (somatic and oocyte-specific
H1) histone variants are involved in the reacquisition of cell totipotency. However,
the specific roles of each variant on chromatin remodeling, EGA, genome repair and
stability, and cell redifferentiation have not been fully characterized. There is
evidence indicating that the expression of sperm protamines in somatic cells prior
to SCNT may improve cell reprogramming (Loi et al., 2021).
Studies using SCNT embryos have helped identifying several epigenetic marks involved
in the regulation of embryo development and cell differentiation and reprogramming.
There is evidence from different studies suggesting that SCNT embryos partially retain
the transcriptional memory inherited from the donor cells, which may be associated
with high levels of H3K4me2/3. Injection of mRNA for KDM5B, a demethylase of H3K4,
into bovine SCNT embryos helped resetting the transcription program in the developing
embryos and improved blastocyst rates and quality (Zhou et al., 2020). Abnormal regulation
of development in SCNT embryos was also correlated with impaired H3K27me3 reprogramming,
and failure in H3K27me3 reestablishment was associated with placental defects (Matoba
et al., 2018). Insufficient H3K27me3 reprogramming may also be associated with abnormal
Xist expression and X chromosome inactivation in SCNT embryos. Lower expression of
the H3K27me3 demethylase KDM6A was observed in SCNT embryos, and embryo development
was improved by inducing its expression after SCNT. Persistent H3K9me3 was identified
as a major epigenetic barrier for cell reprogramming and SCNT embryo development (Matoba
et al., 2014). Both methyltransferases and demethylases of H3K9me3 participate in
the regulation of cell reprogramming. It was observed that the demethylase of H3K9me3,
KDM4B, was expressed at the 2-cell stage of mouse SCNT embryos that developed to the
blastocyst stage, but it was not expressed in those that had an impaired development
(Liu et al., 2016). Moreover, injection of mRNA for KDM4D, a demethylase of H3K9me3,
into mouse SCNT embryos increased reprogramming efficiency and full-term development
eight-fold compared to control SCNT embryos (Matoba et al., 2014). The effect of H3K9me3
as an epigenetic barrier for cell reprogramming seems to be conserved among species,
since its attenuation also increased development of bovine, porcine, and non-human
primates SCNT embryos.
Genome damage repair and stability are also critical elements for successful cell
reprogramming and development of SCNT embryos. Higher incidence of DSBs was observed
in SCNT embryos, which had a negative correlation with embryo quality (Bohrer et al.,
2013). Alleviation of oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress, which are
known to increase DNA damage, improved cell viability, and development of SCNT embryos
(Liang et al., 2017). In addition, treatment with inhibitors of histone deacetylases,
which are commonly used to improve cell reprogramming, enhanced DSBs repair in SCNT
embryos (Bohrer et al., 2014), which further supports a link between epigenetic regulators,
cell reprogramming, and genome stability in SCNT embryos.
Several transcription factors, including Dux, Dppa2, and Dppa4, have been identified
as enhancers of EGA and development in mouse SCNT embryos. For example, induction
of Dux expression enhanced EGA and development of SCNT embryos and improved derivation
of iPS cells (Yang et al., 2020a). In addition, injection of Dux mRNA prior to SCNT
corrected abnormal levels of H3K9 acetylation in genome regions essential for EGA,
thus improving gene activation (Yang et al., 2020b).
Abnormal activation of TEs involved in the regulation of EGA has been associated with
abnormal development of SCNT embryos. For example, it has been found that LTRs and
LINEs were among the major components of reprogramming resistant regions with high
levels of H3K9me3, which were identified to affect EGA and development of mouse SCNT
embryos (Matoba et al., 2014). In addition, overexpression of KDM6A, a demethylase
of H3K27me3, induced the reactivation of a subset of ERVs in SCNT embryos and improved
cell reprogramming efficiency (Yang et al., 2018). These findings provided solid evidence
that TEs play critical roles in the reacquisition of cell totipotence and normal development
in SCNT embryos.
Conditions Affecting Normal Embryo Programming
Given the complex molecular interactions involved in the proper coordination of early
embryo development, it is not surprising that normal embryo programming is highly
sensitive to its developmental milieu, including nutrients, metabolites, and environmental
factors. This is particularly relevant for the use of ARTs requiring long in vitro
culture and/or gamete/embryo manipulations (e.g., in vitro fertilization, sex-sorted
sperm, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gametes/embryo cryopreservation). For example,
in vitro embryo culture conditions were associated with molecular and cellular alterations
in preimplantation bovine embryos and fetal growth compared with embryos that developed
in vivo (Lazzari et al., 2002). Moreover, culture with nutrients excess (e.g., glucose,
lipids), or high oxygen tension, has important detrimental consequences on embryo
metabolism, development, and viability (Sciorio and Smith, 2019; de Lima et al., 2020;
Desmet et al., 2020).
Defective regulation of embryo programming may also emanate from deficiencies inherited
in the gametes (e.g., immaturity, altered epigenetic marks, genome and organelle damages),
which may result in embryos with decreased capacity to regulate cell functions and
development, or having excessive metabolic demands required for the activation of
stress coping mechanisms. In this regard, embryo viability has been associated with
a less active metabolism, which is observed in embryos having less damages or superior
repair capacity (Leese et al., 2007). In addition, embryo cleavage kinetics is affected
by DNA damage (Bohrer et al., 2015), and both embryo metabolism and cleavage kinetics
have been used to select embryos with superior capacity for postimplantation development
(Sugimura et al., 2012). Therefore, providing an ideal development milieu is critical
for the normal regulation of the embryo program.
Conclusion
The establishment and proper regulation of the embryo development program depends
on several conditions that include changes in the chromatin structure, epigenetic
modifications, protein modifications, activation of transcription factors and retrotransposons,
and genome repair and stability (Figure 4). Failures in the proper regulation of these
events can result in either embryo development arrest and death or eventually embryo
survival, but resulting in embryos having lower potential to continue developing,
implanting, and producing a normal offspring, or even contribute to the creation and
segregation of cell anomalies (Figure 4). Although many molecular mechanisms participating
in the regulation of embryo development have been identified and partially characterized,
particularly in mouse embryos, much remains to be accomplished for the complete elucidation
of the embryo programming mechanisms in the different species. In this regard, studies
investigating cell reprogramming in SCNT embryos and 2CLCs have been providing solid
contributions. Better understanding the embryo programming will help to mitigate fertility
issues, increase the efficiency of animal breeding program, animal production, and
improve the success rate of embryo-based technologies.
Figure 4.
Embryo regulation and outcomes. Proper embryo programming and normal development depend
on several events affecting chromatin structure, integrity and function. Altered regulation
end/or excessive stress or damages may cause embryo death or result in embryos having
lower potential for development or carrying alterations having potential detrimental
consequences for health and production. This figure was assembled using Biorender.