38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Further Assessment of Monkeypox Virus Infection in Gambian Pouched Rats ( Cricetomys gambianus) Using In Vivo Bioluminescent Imaging

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Monkeypox is a zoonosis clinically similar to smallpox in humans. Recent evidence has shown a potential risk of increased incidence in central Africa. Despite attempts to isolate the virus from wild rodents and other small mammals, no reservoir host has been identified. In 2003, Monkeypox virus (MPXV) was accidentally introduced into the U.S. via the pet trade and was associated with the Gambian pouched rat ( Cricetomys gambianus). Therefore, we investigated the potential reservoir competence of the Gambian pouched rat for MPXV by utilizing a combination of in vivo and in vitro methods. We inoculated three animals by the intradermal route and three animals by the intranasal route, with one mock-infected control for each route. Bioluminescent imaging (BLI) was used to track replicating virus in infected animals and virological assays (e.g. real time PCR, cell culture) were used to determine viral load in blood, urine, ocular, nasal, oral, and rectal swabs. Intradermal inoculation resulted in clinical signs of monkeypox infection in two of three animals. One severely ill animal was euthanized and the other affected animal recovered. In contrast, intranasal inoculation resulted in subclinical infection in all three animals. All animals, regardless of apparent or inapparent infection, shed virus in oral and nasal secretions. Additionally, BLI identified viral replication in the skin without grossly visible lesions. These results suggest that Gambian pouched rats may play an important role in transmission of the virus to humans, as they are hunted for consumption and it is possible for MPXV-infected pouched rats to shed infectious virus without displaying overt clinical signs.

          Author Summary

          Monkeypox virus is a close relative of Variola virus, the agent of smallpox, and causes a similar disease in humans, with classic pox skin lesions. Up to 10% mortality has been associated with some strains of monkeypox. Monkeypox disease occurs in central and west Africa. It is transmitted to humans from wild animals, but the reservoir species that maintains this virus in nature has not been identified. The Gambian pouched rat ( Cricetomys gambianus) was implicated as a possible source during the 2003 US monkeypox outbreak which resulted in human disease. To understand how the Gambian pouched rat could maintain and transmit the virus, six Gambian pouched rats were infected with Monkeypox virus engineered to express a marker gene, luciferase, which is detectable within the live animal via bioluminescence. Two animals served as uninfected controls. Viral shedding was quantified. Two of three animals infected via the intradermal route became clinically ill. Those infected intranasally showed no signs of disease, but the virus was detected in the nasal and oral cavities and distant sites within their bodies. All infected animals shed live Monkeypox virus. This study indicates that Gambian pouched rats could serve to transmit Monkeypox virus to humans in Africa.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A tale of two clades: monkeypox viruses.

          Human monkeypox was first recognized outside Africa in 2003 during an outbreak in the USA that was traced to imported monkeypox virus (MPXV)-infected West African rodents. Unlike the smallpox-like disease described in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC; a Congo Basin country), disease in the USA appeared milder. Here, analyses compared clinical, laboratory and epidemiological features of confirmed human monkeypox case-patients, using data from outbreaks in the USA and the Congo Basin, and the results suggested that human disease pathogenicity was associated with the viral strain. Genomic sequencing of USA, Western and Central African MPXV isolates confirmed the existence of two MPXV clades. A comparison of open reading frames between MPXV clades permitted prediction of viral proteins that could cause the observed differences in human pathogenicity between these two clades. Understanding the molecular pathogenesis and clinical and epidemiological properties of MPXV can improve monkeypox prevention and control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outbreak of human monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996 to 1997.

            Human monkeypox is a zoonotic smallpox-like disease caused by an orthopoxvirus of interhuman transmissibility too low to sustain spread in susceptible populations. In February 1997, 88 cases of febrile pustular rash were identified for the previous 12 months in 12 villages of the Katako-Kombe Health Zone, Democratic Republic of Congo (attack rate = 22 per 1,000; case-fatality rate = 3.7%). Seven were active cases confirmed by virus isolation. Orthopoxvirus- neutralizing antibodies were detected in 54% of 72 patients who provided serum and 25% of 59 wild-caught animals, mainly squirrels. Hemagglutination-inhibition assays and Western blotting detected antibodies in 68% and 73% of patients, respectively. Vaccinia vaccination, which protects against monkeypox, ceased by 1983 after global smallpox eradication, leading to an increase in the proportion of susceptible people.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Detection of monkeypox virus with real-time PCR assays

              Background Human monkeypox, a zoonotic disease, was first reported outside of Africa during the 2003 US outbreak. Objectives We present two real-time PCR assays critical for laboratory diagnosis of monkeypox during the 2003 US outbreak. Study design A TaqMan-based assay (E9L-NVAR) targets the orthopoxvirus DNA polymerase gene and detects Eurasian orthopoxviruses other than Variola . A hybridization assay, utilizing a MGB Eclipse™ (Epoch Biosciences) probe, targets an envelope protein gene (B6R) and specifically detects monkeypox virus (MPXV). Assays were validated using coded orthopoxvirus DNA samples and used to evaluate lesion samples from five confirmed US monkeypox cases. Results E9L-NVAR did not detect variola (48 strains), North American orthopoxviruses (2), or DNA derived from non-poxviral rash illnesses. The assay reproducibly identified various concentrations of 13 Eurasian orthopoxvirus strains and was sensitive to 12.5 vaccinia genomes. The B6R assay recognized 15 different MPXV strains, while other orthopoxvirus (9) and bacteria (15) strains did not cross-react. Of the 13 human samples tested from confirmed cases, both assays identified 100% as containing MPXV DNA. Conclusions E9L-NVAR and B6R assays demonstrate 100% specificity for non-variola Eurasian orthopoxvirus and MPXV, respectively. Using two discrete viral gene targets, these assays together provide a reliable and sensitive method for quickly confirming monkeypox infections.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                plos
                plosntds
                PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1935-2727
                1935-2735
                30 October 2015
                October 2015
                : 9
                : 10
                : e0004130
                Affiliations
                [1 ]U.S. Geological Survey-National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Pathobiological Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
                [3 ]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Centers for Zoonotic and Vector-Borne and Enteric Diseases, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
                Stanford University School of Medicine, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: EAF DSC JEO TER. Performed the experiments: EAF JGL FL. Analyzed the data: EAF JGL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JSS CLH JD NGR DSC JEO TER. Wrote the paper: EAF JGL FL JSS CLH JD NGR DSC JEO TER.

                Article
                PNTD-D-15-00303
                10.1371/journal.pntd.0004130
                4627722
                26517839
                1d2bbf24-e1bc-47bb-b5ac-4334bc54aaac

                This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication

                History
                : 24 February 2015
                : 9 September 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 1, Pages: 19
                Funding
                This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health ( www.NIH.gov), grant number NIH R01 TW 8859-3. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and Supporting Information files.

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article